- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Massie going against Trump again
Posted on 1/2/26 at 12:59 pm to Pragmatist2025
Posted on 1/2/26 at 12:59 pm to Pragmatist2025
quote:
Pragmatist2025
I appreciate the discussion.
I’ll admit I’m not the most wise on the Israel pulling the strings thing and I don’t see the Jews as innocents. I hate how antisemitism is a cry against free speech as speech is unlimited.
quote:
The President and Massie have been Twitter fighting for a while now. As I have said before, I wish they would handle these affairs in private
Same. Outside of the 8 people attacking most people know Massie is strongly against Trump no matter what. It’s not a good look when they both have R next to their name.
quote:
I understand the free speech part, but it is difficult to protect the free speech of citizens in a sovereign nation without violating their sovereignty.
I agree and understand it’s Iran where they don’t have free speech. Everyone should as a Republican, conservative or the left always be for free speech against hostile regimes. It’s okay to do it against Trump when he says something but now people are ignoring the speech issue because of the Jew conspiracies that podcasters focus on.
2
Posted on 1/2/26 at 1:00 pm to Taxing Authority
Bless your heart.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 1:01 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Evidently you did need to look it up because... chatgpt. And since you have studied this extensively, I would have expected you to know all about the constitution, it being signed, and when it was signed/ratified. It was ratified on June 21, 1788.
The Quasi war. When did it happen? 10 years after the ratification of the Constitution that you claim does not allow a president to do this. Then explain the Quasi war. It was a purely Executive decision.
The Quasi-War (1798–1800) is one of the earliest and most important precedents for how presidential power can be used short of a declared war. It sits right at the intersection of constitutional limits, executive discretion, and congressional authorization.
And you know, since you are an attorney, I would have thought you would have known about the SCOTUS decision that 100% validated Adams. Bas v. Tingy (1800)
So back to Massie. He is either too stupid to be in congress or he knows he's lying and is pandering to his small base and media.
The Quasi war. When did it happen? 10 years after the ratification of the Constitution that you claim does not allow a president to do this. Then explain the Quasi war. It was a purely Executive decision.
The Quasi-War (1798–1800) is one of the earliest and most important precedents for how presidential power can be used short of a declared war. It sits right at the intersection of constitutional limits, executive discretion, and congressional authorization.
And you know, since you are an attorney, I would have thought you would have known about the SCOTUS decision that 100% validated Adams. Bas v. Tingy (1800)
So back to Massie. He is either too stupid to be in congress or he knows he's lying and is pandering to his small base and media.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 1:02 pm to Jugbow
quote:
Trump tweets this stuff out to make the point of FAFO, so far it’s done wonders for this administration
Hooray! Jugbow and I agree on something. Trump is using the bully pulpit for good use.
It's what happens when Iran calls him on his threat that will be interesting.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 1:02 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:Like how democrats see a reduction in baseline budgeting as a "cut", they think we have deflation, apparently?
Thats not deflation. Thats a drop in the rate of inflation.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 1:02 pm to BCreed1
quote:
Roger is the only one talking deflation. That's because he is trying to skirt the fact that inflation did drop.
I think he's being literal about words and taking advantage of you being an economic neophyte.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 1:03 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
Massholes are losing it yet again
read the thread title. Posted on 1/2/26 at 1:05 pm to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:Plenty of cheating spouses love their mates. They're still cheaters.
Trump loves America
Posted on 1/2/26 at 1:05 pm to BCreed1
quote:
Did inflation drop from 3% to 2.7% or not?
Inflation DID. NOT DROP. This proves how dumb you are
Posted on 1/2/26 at 1:05 pm to David_DJS
quote:
I think he's being literal about words
No. Roger is literally the only person to bring up deflation. Again, it's because he was busted on the fact that the inflation rate dropped. So he switched to deflation leaving off the term rate.
quote:
taking advantage of you being an economic neophyte.
you got that backwards.
This post was edited on 1/2/26 at 1:10 pm
Posted on 1/2/26 at 1:05 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Like how democrats see a reduction in baseline budgeting as a "cut", they think we have deflation, apparently?
Lol.. yep
Posted on 1/2/26 at 1:05 pm to Jugbow
quote:
most people know Massie is strongly against Trump no matter what.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 1/2/26 at 1:06 pm to Jugbow
quote:
The irony is Massie is only worried about what Trump does
Maybe when you grow up, you can be America First like Thomas. Outside of immigration you would struggle to come up with two things. Trump has done that. He said he would do or that are in your best interest, but you keep licking and polishing that boot.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 1:06 pm to David_DJS
Ooof
Posted on 1/2/26 at 1:08 pm to BCreed1
quote:I wouldnt try defending that record either.
Bless your heart.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 1:09 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Inflation DID. NOT DROP. This proves how dumb you are
No kiddo. It proves you are a dishonest hack trying to play on words and everybody gets it. Even the ones that defend your antics simply due to their own TDS.
We all know we are talking about rates. But then you want to go into a whole different topic over inflation vs deflation. And I'm not going to allow you to skirt it your fig of a liberal.
DID THE INFLATION RATE DROP? Yes or No?
YES it did.. with tariffs in play.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 1:10 pm to BCreed1
quote:
you got that backwards.
I don't.
What you're arguing stated correctly would be, "the rate of inflation has dropped" which is different than "inflation dropped".
Posted on 1/2/26 at 1:11 pm to David_DJS
quote:
The herd need a bogey man, even if they have to invent it.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 1:11 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Evidently you did need to look it up because... chatgpt. And since you have studied this extensively, I would have expected you to know all about the constitution, it being signed, and when it was signed/ratified. It was ratified on June 21, 1788.
The Quasi war. When did it happen? 10 years after the ratification of the Constitution that you claim does not allow a president to do this. Then explain the Quasi war. It was a purely Executive decision.
The Quasi-War (1798–1800) is one of the earliest and most important precedents for how presidential power can be used short of a declared war. It sits right at the intersection of constitutional limits, executive discretion, and congressional authorization.
And you know, since you are an attorney, I would have thought you would have known about the SCOTUS decision that 100% validated Adams. Bas v. Tingy (1800)
So back to Massie. He is either too stupid to be in congress or he knows he's lying and is pandering to his small base and media.
The Quasi war. When did it happen? 10 years after the ratification of the Constitution that you claim does not allow a president to do this. Then explain the Quasi war. It was a purely Executive decision.
The Quasi-War (1798–1800) is one of the earliest and most important precedents for how presidential power can be used short of a declared war. It sits right at the intersection of constitutional limits, executive discretion, and congressional authorization.
And you know, since you are an attorney, I would have thought you would have known about the SCOTUS decision that 100% validated Adams. Bas v. Tingy (1800)
So back to Massie. He is either too stupid to be in congress or he knows he's lying and is pandering to his small base and media.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 1:16 pm to RogerTheShrubber
What has Massie done to help in this regard?
Not during POTUS 45, 46 or 47.
But he's going to save trillions getting to the bottom of the Epstein list.
quote:Zilch.
I have enjoyed the border closure and deportations. Promises kept.
Not during POTUS 45, 46 or 47.
But he's going to save trillions getting to the bottom of the Epstein list.
Page 11 of 19
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News