- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mass shooting at Tx baptist church
Posted on 11/6/17 at 8:27 am to Homesick Tiger
Posted on 11/6/17 at 8:27 am to Homesick Tiger
quote:
Otherwise we'd all be heathens doing terrible things.
So you would do terrible things if the bible didn't tell you not to? Dunno if you wanna have this debate.
Posted on 11/6/17 at 8:29 am to RobbBobb
What country isn't warring? I don't think we have much room to talk about others "warring" we're just more technologically advanced (thanks frontal lobes) and we invest more into the military than the next 6 countries behind us combined. We're not "modern man" we're still the missing link between primate and modern man, we're just too ignorant to realize it.
Posted on 11/6/17 at 8:31 am to olddawg26
quote:
So you would do terrible things if the bible didn't tell you not to?
If you don't have a moral compass within your conscience then doing terrible things would not be terrible to you.
Posted on 11/6/17 at 8:33 am to Homesick Tiger
Well then Im glad you have religion so we dont have another person out there who can't handle reality.
Posted on 11/6/17 at 8:36 am to olddawg26
quote:
What country isn't warring?
Within itself?
When the recent floods occurred did the citizens of Houston raid San Antonio for their goods, women, and children, and kill their men. Or did a flood of relief come from millions of people who were raised as Christians to help the needy
Because up until the 1900s, this land was shaped by the former, not the latter. Christianity changed that mindset rapidly, not anthropology
Posted on 11/6/17 at 8:37 am to RobbBobb
quote:
Europe and America were founded by Christian principles, the security and safety that you enjoy there, is only because of the guiding principles of its foundings. You cannot argue that a lessened standard, is better than having started with no standard at all
You take Christ out of our foundation, and we are just the Indian tribes that were constantly at war over the same piece of geography
you can take Western values, including the good parts of Judeo-Christian religions, without believing in the gods involved
i'm a huge fan of Western culture and I respect what roles Judaism and Christianity played in the development of that culture
i'm also a huge fan of many eastern philosophies that counter both (and don't have "gods" in the same way)
that's how i try to develop my morality and world view. sampling them all. religion itself isn't required, especially when you accept the role of man in the development of these religions.
Posted on 11/6/17 at 8:39 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Can it for the overall general populace?
that's actually a very good question and in the US, i'd say probably not
you're probably going to have the same breakdown as other outputs from our wide demographics
Posted on 11/6/17 at 8:43 am to RobbBobb
quote:
Within itself?
We've had our issues, dont you think?
As many of you calling for the removal of the pr0g left filth, pretending everything is peachy is pretty ignorant no?
Things are way worse in africa, probably always will be, but it damn sure isn't because people have studied enough to know there's not demonstrable evidence for a supreme celestial North Korea. It's because they are dumber and acting on emotion. We have the constitution, we took everything good from evolution of other countries and "started over here", and STILL had the civil war. So if christianity and the bible is the only wall between you being peaceful and a murder spree, I support your every move to attend church this sunday, just don't act like if someone doesn't think like you they aren't as moral.
This post was edited on 11/6/17 at 8:45 am
Posted on 11/6/17 at 8:46 am to olddawg26
quote:
So you’re saying those who are weak minded enough to commit crimes and be influenced negatively through whatever means are more dangerous if they have an atheistic POV than say a Muslim?
I think false Religion is more pernicious/dangerous/harmful than Atheism, OD, because Belief/God is more powerful than non-belief. The former offers everything...the latter, nothing. There is no 'grey'...it's one or the other. Existence or non-existence. Love or it's opposite. Time...and evolution assures that.
Posted on 11/6/17 at 8:48 am to olddawg26
quote:
just don't act like if someone doesn't think like you they aren't as moral.
So you think all people are inherently "good"?
Posted on 11/6/17 at 8:49 am to RCDfan1950
quote:
I think false Religion is more pernicious/dangerous/harmful than Atheism, OD, because Belief/God is more powerful than non-belief. The former offers everything...the latter, nothing. There is no 'grey'...it's one or the other. Existence or non-existence. Love or it's opposite. Time...and evolution assures that.
I agree with you here. Islam is far more dangerous than atheism and it shouldn't even be a debate. Atheists love life, and want to value the time they have while here, not spend it in a prison or dead. Take that same man and inject islam into him. "Yeah after you're dead you're going to heaven with a bunch of virgins and you'll live for eternity in bliss" . Try and convince an atheist of that and they'll laugh in your face and walk off.
Posted on 11/6/17 at 8:50 am to Lg
quote:
So you think all people are inherently "good"?
No
Posted on 11/6/17 at 8:57 am to EthanL
quote:
Fcuk all these hypocrites. On both sides
That's "many sides", brah.
Posted on 11/6/17 at 9:00 am to olddawg26
quote:
No
Okay. So what, according to the society we live in, is the moral standard? If not God, then it's man's correct? So, if it's man's moral standard and man isn't inherently "good" it really can be just whatever man wants it to be.
Posted on 11/6/17 at 9:01 am to Homesick Tiger
quote:
If you don't have a moral compass within your conscience then doing terrible things would not be terrible to you.
I think we all have a conscience of some sort with some type of moral system. Exception would be sociopaths.
Posted on 11/6/17 at 9:10 am to Lg
quote:
it really can be just whatever man wants it to be.
Well, it could have been like that but humans quickly figured out, before modern religion, that killing, stealing, etc was detrimental to a society. We are pack animals, we survive as a community and anyone who can't help us survive from the inside hurts us from the outside too. We have the threat of police, retaliations and prisons now for that extra deterrent to be good within the community. To be fair to some religions the threat of hell and the promise of heaven definitely helps the easily swayed. But to say no moral compass would exist without a personal god isn't true, and millions of atheists prove that daily. Seems the religious (looking at you mostly islam) are more easily coaxed into negative actions than the non religious. Saying "god" has the moral code for man means really nothing to atheists given they think man made god in the first place. So yes, we still have psychopaths and people who can't function in societies that act on these aggressions, but that would fit in perfectly in a reality where mans moral code is his own.
Posted on 11/6/17 at 9:14 am to Lg
quote:
So you think all people are inherently "good"?
I think all people walk the line between light and dark, and spend a decent bit of time on both sides.
Posted on 11/6/17 at 9:15 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
do you believe that religion was held in higher esteem by our nation 20-30 years ago?
Marginally, yes. But since the 'woodstock' phenomenon where promiscuous sex became celebrated instead of frowned upon, the moral decline has become exponential.
I have been around a long time - and grew up with some pretty uncouth characters as acquaintances - but have never seen outright antipathy towards religion as it is being expressed today. And some of the uncouth characters I grew up around became religious as an adult - to a far greater extent than I ever was.
There has always been outright evil in the world - and always will be in isolated cases. But an overall moral ethic - which was due largely to the religious underpinnings of society acting as a damping agent to prevent that evil from becoming an attractive agent - was the thread that held our national fabric together.
Now, that damping factor is being minimized - even assaulted in its own right. The evil that exists is allowed to attract the marginal people who in early years would have been deterred and changed their ways - they are now being lured toward the evil side with no resistance. They are being encouraged by the ongoing mockery of anything promoting decency and morality.
And as that domino falls, the bar of 'what is so evil that it must be rejected by all' is moved a notch lower, so more people join the mocking crowd. In control systems this is referred to as 'positive feedback' - which is the death knell of any feedback controlled system. We are seeing that destructive process at work in our society.
You do not have to be a religious fanatic to recognize the fact that religion serves as a damper for runaway evil. Nothing in human existence is perfect - but we can all seek perfection. This is far better for society than the belief that establishing decent social norms is somehow 'religious bigotry' to be rejected and flouted with celebratory acclaim.
I am as far from an evangelical religious fanatic as possible - I never talk about my religion, mailly because it is such a lukewarm factor in my life. But I am wise enough to recognize that the country was founded with that ethos as its driving cultural definition - and that we became a great nation by loosely adhering to its unwritten tenets.
Knocking out those underpinnings just because you can point to some unscrupulous priest or amoral Elmer Gantry tent preacher is suicidal.
Posted on 11/6/17 at 9:37 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
morality can be reasoned without a god
Of course it can - but that reasoning has its underpinnings of at least 5000 of civilization which took place within some kind of religious belief in some sort a 'higher power.' You would have to go back a couple of million years and influence the evolutionary processes influencing the concept of 'thought' itself to have a source for 'reason' without the influence of "god" at its base.
True - you can get a group of intellectual philosophers together and they can 'reason' that morality can be achieved without a 'god.' But these intellectual philosophers are not the ones out in the streets blocking highways, burning down neighborhoods, shooting up concerts or churches or nightclubs, attacking political opponents, etc.
I could argue either side of the 'is there a god' debate with equal robustness. But I could not be convinced of the 'there is no god' side regardless of the merits of the debate. That is something that cannot be proved by the opinions of others.
Popular
Back to top


1





