- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/25/18 at 7:29 am to stat19
quote:
Cuck on this shite all day, I don't care, but the fact that we're being raped globally has got to end.
The whole cuck thing is a silly ad hominem attack that does nothing for your argument.
As Levin was saying yesterday in his usual form... Global trade is about BUSINESSES TRADING WITH BUSINESSES, NOT GOVERNMENTS TRADING WITH GOVERNMENTS. We are not getting raped by engaging in global trade.
Posted on 7/25/18 at 7:30 am to CivilTiger83
quote:
You're right... This board is definitely more intelligent than Levin, and he doesn't havy any understanding of common sense economics.
You're making an appeal to authority. Lots of smart people disagree on economic policies and many other things.
Posted on 7/25/18 at 7:31 am to CivilTiger83
If we have tariffs long term then Trump will have made a big mistake. I don’t think that’s trumps plan. I think he is constantly looking to leverage his position as POTUS to strong arm countries into paying us off. He says “we provide security for Europe why is Germany profiting from big gas deals with Russia instead of us? We feed China’s economy and they can’t stop stealing our IP or manage North Korea?” He’s reminding them that the US still runs shite and they will pay to play if they want input. No more freebies.
Posted on 7/25/18 at 7:32 am to goofball
quote:
Out of curiosity, do you understand why we are imposing tarriffs on some Chinese and EU goods today?
Votes in OH, MI, WI, PA, IA, before the mid terms.
This will all end regardless of the outcome in December--I hope.
Posted on 7/25/18 at 7:33 am to CivilTiger83
Well glad that you are, but it’s like Trump has said, the fight has already been lost, that happened under past administrations, now isn’t the time to continue in the direction of past losers. There might be pain in healing, that I can tell you.
Posted on 7/25/18 at 7:33 am to CivilTiger83
quote:No it makes the people his call-screeners let thru incompetent at understanding the issue and making a point.
and was making the pro-tariff callers look silly for their lack of understanding of economics.
Does that make Levin a traitorous globalist, or is Trump possibly wrong on this?
quote:You mean like the French did with Yogurt?
Does anybody else think it's crazy that Trump can arbitrarily set tariifs on any product and claim national security as the reason?
The WTO has written in asymmetric trade agreements allowing others a substantial advantage in trading with the US. The only way to unwind that asymmetry within WTO rules is to claim national security concerns. Other countries have done that over the years. We typically have not.
Posted on 7/25/18 at 7:33 am to CivilTiger83
Tariffs are bad. they are bad for us to have them and they are bad for our trading partners to have them. if the purpose of us imposing tariffs s to get our trading partners to remove these and then we remove ours, how is this bad.
big question on reason we have allowed our partners to get away with unequal trading. Have we been to scared to stand up, or have special interest donations taken the ear of our past administrations and told them to leave it alone.
have a president that is hot beholden to special interests, and he is now fighting for the nation as a whole.
big question on reason we have allowed our partners to get away with unequal trading. Have we been to scared to stand up, or have special interest donations taken the ear of our past administrations and told them to leave it alone.
have a president that is hot beholden to special interests, and he is now fighting for the nation as a whole.
Posted on 7/25/18 at 7:34 am to CivilTiger83
I agree with Levin on this.
I get Trump’s endgame but I also recognize that it is a huge gamble. In a vacuum, tariffs are fricking terrible.
I get Trump’s endgame but I also recognize that it is a huge gamble. In a vacuum, tariffs are fricking terrible.
Posted on 7/25/18 at 7:38 am to CivilTiger83
quote:
As Levin was saying yesterday in his usual form... Global trade is about BUSINESSES TRADING WITH BUSINESSES, NOT GOVERNMENTS TRADING WITH GOVERNMENTS. We are not getting raped by engaging in global trade.
true in part, but misses the mark on others. Example, if the EU taxes our auto imports, and say Ford decides to move a plant to France to avoid a tariff so their product can compete in the EU market, the US loses as we again ship our jobs out of the country. n Repeat this enough times and its a major impact.
Again, the end goal is the removal of all tariffs on both sides. also, would like the end result the removal of subsidies as well
Posted on 7/25/18 at 7:41 am to Antonio Moss
If he wins, a permanent swing in the Midwest would be every bit worth the short term suffering
Posted on 7/25/18 at 7:43 am to CivilTiger83
All I care about is fairness. And a nearly $1T trade deficit is not fair to the USA. So many people are jumping ship before TRUMP's strategy even has time to play out. I hate tariffs. I want to see them gone.
But, it's not just the tariffs we have put on other countries that should be razed. These tariffs are hurting other countries worse than they're hurting us at the moment, but everybody including Levin is freaking out about the future. Countries like China are literally raping us on both tariffs and theft of intellectual property.
A $21T national debt is unacceptable, and with fair and free trade, that debt will mostly be paid off within a generation. That's the end game here. Why is it ok for the USA to have a nearly $1T trade deficit but it's not ok to place reciprocal tariffs on the very same countries that are cheating us? If someone can answer that question and the answer make sense- I'll stand down. Until then, I want fair and free trade. Contrary to popular belief, Trump is not stupid. These tariffs are the result of the unwillingness of other countries to admit they are financially robbing us. Trump tried to give them an easy, diplomatic way out, but they wouldn't bend. So now he has to make them bend or break.
Pulling out of this trade war right now would guarantee a Democratic/socialist president takes over in 2020. That's exactly why all the libtards are sky screaming about muh tariffs. That's their plan. Sorry, but Trump will not break. Nor will the USA fall any further. In time, these other countries will ultimately bend the knee. In the meantime, we have to be patient.
We watched Hussein singlehandedly double the national deficit in 8 years. Yet, we can't give the already existing and new tariffs even a year or two to work? This is TDS at its absolute pinnacle.
But, it's not just the tariffs we have put on other countries that should be razed. These tariffs are hurting other countries worse than they're hurting us at the moment, but everybody including Levin is freaking out about the future. Countries like China are literally raping us on both tariffs and theft of intellectual property.
A $21T national debt is unacceptable, and with fair and free trade, that debt will mostly be paid off within a generation. That's the end game here. Why is it ok for the USA to have a nearly $1T trade deficit but it's not ok to place reciprocal tariffs on the very same countries that are cheating us? If someone can answer that question and the answer make sense- I'll stand down. Until then, I want fair and free trade. Contrary to popular belief, Trump is not stupid. These tariffs are the result of the unwillingness of other countries to admit they are financially robbing us. Trump tried to give them an easy, diplomatic way out, but they wouldn't bend. So now he has to make them bend or break.
Pulling out of this trade war right now would guarantee a Democratic/socialist president takes over in 2020. That's exactly why all the libtards are sky screaming about muh tariffs. That's their plan. Sorry, but Trump will not break. Nor will the USA fall any further. In time, these other countries will ultimately bend the knee. In the meantime, we have to be patient.
We watched Hussein singlehandedly double the national deficit in 8 years. Yet, we can't give the already existing and new tariffs even a year or two to work? This is TDS at its absolute pinnacle.
Posted on 7/25/18 at 7:45 am to NIH
And he did reach out to the mid west. He’s doing exactly what he campaigned on, and now we get people saying he isn’t full fledged conservative. He never was and never claimed to be! It’s rare when a politician follows through on what they campaigned on.
Posted on 7/25/18 at 7:51 am to CivilTiger83
What I have hoped and continue to hope is that the Deal Maker In Chief is mostly bluffing to negotiate better deals for freer trade, but so far, no deals (on trade or with North Korea) and an unsettling tendency toward industrial policy, which is anathema to my flavor of conservatism. Although Democrats are loathe to admit it, so much is going right under this president. I suspect that the only near-term danger to the economy and to the Trump presidency is in Trump's trade policy.
Posted on 7/25/18 at 7:52 am to KeyserSoze999
People looking for 99% theoretical purity from
Trump are undertaking a fools errand
Trump are undertaking a fools errand
Posted on 7/25/18 at 7:53 am to Antonio Moss
quote:So was Midway.
but I also recognize that it is a huge gamble
Ultimately you're right of course. It is a risk. So is betting a full house. It's just a matter of scaling the odds. Given current trade differentials and relative impact on various parties, odds here should favor the US.
Posted on 7/25/18 at 7:53 am to CivilTiger83
quote:
And how temporary is temporary for these tariffs? A year? Five years?
Until he figures out they do not work. Took Bush 43 about a year and a half to figure it out when he tried steel tariffs. I'm okay with the tariffs on China it's the rest of them that don't make sense. Here's a general rule on economic policies. If Bernie Sanders agrees with it it is a bad idea.
Posted on 7/25/18 at 7:54 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Given current trade differentials and relative impact on various parties, odds here should favor the US.
In a big way.
Posted on 7/25/18 at 7:56 am to CivilTiger83
quote:
Levin is a constitutional and legal savant but he's no economic genius nor does he apparently understand basic negotiation strategies
You're right... This board is definitely more intelligent than Levin, and he doesn't havy any understanding of common sense economics
You beat the shite out of that straw man, good job.
quote:
Y'all need to wake up... Just because you think he is a great President, doesn't mean you need to give up your right to reason for yourselves.
GFY buddy, I've been thinking for myself since I was a teenager. I'm no Trump but Ive started, run, bought and sold dozens of successful businesses and I understand basic economics and negotiations and apparently you haven't a clue...
quote:
This is a mistake.
your opinion
quote:
A mistake he shouldn't be able to make, because the Constitution doesn't grant those powers.
I was right, you haven't a clue
Popular
Back to top
