- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/2/22 at 10:36 am to Vacherie Saint
Sure, the ongoing gnashing of teeth is legitimate with seemingly new revelations daily, but we're apparently not going to get those desperately wished-for secure "paper ballots" anytime soon.
Variations of what took place in Maricopa County went on in just about every major inner city in the critical states. Why you think that was?
But for Maricopa County itself, have to borrow a page from the leftist handbook and inconveniently remind everyone - both on the left and right who actually salivated over the forced removal of Sheriff Arpaio - that they have nearly as much "capital" in this grand shuck as the actual mules who got it done there.
From the night of Nov 3 he would've been right in the middle of what was actually an open blatant taunt, ferreting out and identifying publicly every possible collaborator and accessory to it.
Even had he needed another tent city just to house them, and carloads of more pink underwear.
But hey, the anti-Arpaio types believed they had it right at the time. It was part of their legacy of being successfully conditioned by whatever their propaganda mill of choice.
He would've expedited a close to this insult considerably faster than where we find ourselves presently.
But then something about, "the evil that men do live after them..."
Variations of what took place in Maricopa County went on in just about every major inner city in the critical states. Why you think that was?
But for Maricopa County itself, have to borrow a page from the leftist handbook and inconveniently remind everyone - both on the left and right who actually salivated over the forced removal of Sheriff Arpaio - that they have nearly as much "capital" in this grand shuck as the actual mules who got it done there.
From the night of Nov 3 he would've been right in the middle of what was actually an open blatant taunt, ferreting out and identifying publicly every possible collaborator and accessory to it.
Even had he needed another tent city just to house them, and carloads of more pink underwear.
But hey, the anti-Arpaio types believed they had it right at the time. It was part of their legacy of being successfully conditioned by whatever their propaganda mill of choice.
He would've expedited a close to this insult considerably faster than where we find ourselves presently.
But then something about, "the evil that men do live after them..."
Posted on 8/2/22 at 10:37 am to ronricks
quote:
It is when his opponent gets even more.
It is not meaningless. In fact, it’s a strong argument against your proposition that Trump was so severely disliked that he generated the highest turnout in voter history against him.
I am starting to think you don’t really understand numbers.
Posted on 8/2/22 at 10:37 am to 1BIGTigerFan
Bam! This is the hard evidence we've been waiting for!
It was made public at a meeting of We The People AZ. I don't know what that is but it sounds patriotic enough. I took a look and they seem to be funded primarily by the Overstock guy and the pillow guy so I know I can trust them.
I never heard of Matt Van Bibber, but he sounds credible, and I believe every thing he says.
It was made public at a meeting of We The People AZ. I don't know what that is but it sounds patriotic enough. I took a look and they seem to be funded primarily by the Overstock guy and the pillow guy so I know I can trust them.
I never heard of Matt Van Bibber, but he sounds credible, and I believe every thing he says.
Posted on 8/2/22 at 10:38 am to AggieHank86
quote:
This is why the remedy to to close the gaps that allow these things to happen.
Democrats and GOPe are the gaps. Throw them out of office, the gaps are closed.
Posted on 8/2/22 at 10:38 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Trump grew his Vote total by over 11MM, the most in American presidential election history. More than Reagan in 1984!
That's great but it means absolutely nothing when your opponent gets more votes. Just like if a basketball team scores 160 points sounds like a lot doesn't it? Well, it's meaningless if the other team scores 180. Do you understand this?
Posted on 8/2/22 at 10:38 am to tigerpoboy
Posted on 8/2/22 at 10:39 am to tigerpoboy
That’s quite an unfunny schtick you’re working on.
Posted on 8/2/22 at 10:39 am to ronricks
so your argument is that people hated Trump so much, they voted for him more and by a larger margin than ever before? Dem voting blocs like Blacks and Latinos flocked to Trump because they were voting against him?
Look. I'm not interested in going back and forth with a non-sensical and emotional lib-bot who refuses to acknowledge that 2020 was a sham election. Whether Joe wins in the old format or not - who knows? I seriously doubt it because the 2020 markers were crystal clear, but there's really no question as to why he cemented this win. Tons of help from the media and a mail-in vote scheme that made it impossible to truly audit the results. This isnt up for debate.
Look. I'm not interested in going back and forth with a non-sensical and emotional lib-bot who refuses to acknowledge that 2020 was a sham election. Whether Joe wins in the old format or not - who knows? I seriously doubt it because the 2020 markers were crystal clear, but there's really no question as to why he cemented this win. Tons of help from the media and a mail-in vote scheme that made it impossible to truly audit the results. This isnt up for debate.
Posted on 8/2/22 at 10:39 am to CelticDog
quote:
the only correct answer:
only paper ballots.
1. you can be sure of a recount.
2. everyone knows how to count one.
its not as fast but its 100% auditable.
Paper ballots with all of the security of $100 bills.
Posted on 8/2/22 at 10:40 am to the808bass
Sounds like another investigation is in order!
Posted on 8/2/22 at 10:41 am to the808bass
quote:
It is not meaningless. In fact, it’s a strong argument against your proposition that Trump was so severely disliked that he generated the highest turnout in voter history against him.
I am starting to think you don’t really understand numbers.
People were not voting FOR Joe Biden they were voting AGAINST Donald Trump. When you can understand that and then factor in even the laziest Americans could literally vote from their couch it all makes sense. Trump screaming 'fraud' because he lost doesn't mean much.
Posted on 8/2/22 at 10:41 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
Sounds like another investigation is in order
Sounds like you don’t give a shite about safe elections.
Posted on 8/2/22 at 10:42 am to ronricks
quote:
People were not voting FOR Joe Biden they were voting AGAINST Donald Trump.
So you think that Trump in 2024 would bring about similar turnout numbers to 2020.
Posted on 8/2/22 at 10:42 am to the808bass
I think we all do. I think the more we investigate the more we find the last election wasn’t as “fraudulent” as many here claim.
So let’s go run this one down too.
So let’s go run this one down too.
Posted on 8/2/22 at 10:44 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
so your argument is that people hated Trump so much, they voted for him more and by a larger margin than ever before? Dem voting blocs like Blacks and Latinos flocked to Trump because they were voting against him?
Trump increasing his vote totals from 2016 literally means nothing. Why? Because his opponent also got a record number of votes. Everyone with an IQ above 80 knew BOTH candidates were going to get a lot of votes due to how easy it was to vote. Biden happened to get more and a large majority of those votes were cast not necessarily for Biden but against Donald Trump who is extremely disliked outside his base which is not enough to win an election.
Posted on 8/2/22 at 10:44 am to ronricks
He GAINED in traditional dem stronghold voting blocs like Blacks, Latinos, and Asians dumbshit. He was getting MORE votes from the very people who were supposed to be "voting against him".
He lost because of covid-voting. covid-voting is sketchy and questionable as frick. People are going to ask questions when every traditional election market is flipped on its ear. end of story.
He lost because of covid-voting. covid-voting is sketchy and questionable as frick. People are going to ask questions when every traditional election market is flipped on its ear. end of story.
Posted on 8/2/22 at 10:45 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
I think the more we investigate the more we find the last election wasn’t as “fraudulent” as many here claim.
I think it is more obvious than ever that fraud/cheating/lack of controls were a major influence on the election outcome.
Posted on 8/2/22 at 10:45 am to KingGator81
quote:
*nothingtoseeheregif*
You forgot to give credit to the one who said it, FailFail
Posted on 8/2/22 at 10:46 am to the808bass
quote:
So you think that Trump in 2024 would bring about similar turnout numbers to 2020.
Trump will get creamed because just like in 2020 people are going to come out in droves just to vote against him no matter who the Democratic candidate is. Can you understand this?
Page 5 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News