- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Maricopa County IDs Election Workers Who Deleted Ariz. Audit Files.
Posted on 8/2/22 at 4:13 pm to Fat Bastard
Posted on 8/2/22 at 4:13 pm to Fat Bastard
Your links…did a 5th grader build those websites? Yikes. What an obscure piece of crap those links are.
1
Posted on 8/2/22 at 4:16 pm to ronricks
quote:
There was massive fraud but it’s never been proven and anyone who disagrees is a Marxist Trans Homosexual Fascist Liberal!!!!!!!!!
who has ever said this? You seem to be projecting
Posted on 8/2/22 at 4:19 pm to ronricks
quote:
Rudy, Lin Wood, Sidney Powell were given a forum and it was a laughable disaster.
Why are those three the ones you mention? Let’s go with them regardless. Which forum, specifically were their cases heard? And how were each of their cases dismissed? Procedurally or substantively?
This post was edited on 8/2/22 at 4:20 pm
Posted on 8/2/22 at 4:19 pm to ronricks
quote:
Donald Trump because in his 4 years in office he upset more people than he was able to turn to his side.
Did he? Or did cnn, msnbc, ny times, etc.. lie to the people and upset them?
Posted on 8/2/22 at 4:21 pm to ronricks
quote:
It’s not hard to see how a guy who is widely disliked and couldn’t even hit a 50% approval rating could lose an election with mail in voting where it was easier for Americans to vote than anytime in history.
The way it happened was a near statistical impossibility.
You: nuh uh.
Me: RES IPSA
Posted on 8/2/22 at 4:22 pm to ronricks
quote:
There was massive fraud but it’s never been proven and anyone who disagrees is a Marxist Trans Homosexual Fascist Liberal!!!!!!!!!
I’ll let your side stick to the hyperbole. Classic liberal projection. This post was edited on 8/2/22 at 4:23 pm
Posted on 8/2/22 at 4:25 pm to dgnx6
quote:
who has ever said this? You seem to be projecting
I’ve been called a ‘liberal’ and a ‘Marxist’ several times in this thread despite the fact I have never in my life voted for a liberal Democrat or a democrat period. All because I think Trump lost the 2020 election. What a time to be alive.
Posted on 8/2/22 at 4:27 pm to dgnx6
quote:
Did he? Or did cnn, msnbc, ny times, etc.. lie to the people and upset them?
It literally doesn’t matter. People don’t have to justify or give a testimony about their vote. Trump got fricking obliterated.
Posted on 8/2/22 at 4:29 pm to ronricks
quote:
Trump got fricking obliterated.
even if the vote count was legit, he want obliterated. Are you one of those popular vote morons? Oh, by the way…it is painfully clear you get your info from those channels/papers mentioned above.
This post was edited on 8/2/22 at 4:30 pm
Posted on 8/2/22 at 4:34 pm to BBONDS25
Currently watching The Five on Fox News. Sorry but I don’t watch cnn or msnbc.
Posted on 8/2/22 at 4:35 pm to ronricks
quote:
Currently watching The Five on Fox News.
Part of your problem right there.
This post was edited on 8/2/22 at 4:36 pm
Posted on 8/2/22 at 4:36 pm to Blitzed
I like Jesse Waters and Kennedy. Sue me.
Posted on 8/2/22 at 4:36 pm to ronricks
Ok Ron. If possible for a moment, get your focus off of Trump’s personality and remind us what achievements more tempered, traditional “Republicans” have attained for the benefit of Americans these past 30 or so years?
You’ve never voted for a democrat so assuming your kind of “republican” can again be the nominee what kind of good things should we expect? What would you be looking for?
You’ve never voted for a democrat so assuming your kind of “republican” can again be the nominee what kind of good things should we expect? What would you be looking for?
Posted on 8/2/22 at 4:36 pm to ronricks
quote:
Currently watching The Five on Fox News. Sorry but I don’t watch cnn or msnbc.
Fox isn’t much better than the others.
thanks for proving my point. Posted on 8/2/22 at 4:37 pm to ronricks
quote:
I like Jesse Waters and Kennedy. Sue me.
You would get it thrown out on standing and then claim you won on substance.
Posted on 8/2/22 at 4:37 pm to ronricks
quote:A Democracy can survive electoral corruption if the population does not perceive its elections as corrupt. A Democracy cannot long survive perception of electoral corruption even if its elections are not actually corrupt.
There was massive fraud but it’s never been proven and anyone who disagrees is a Marxist Trans Homosexual Fascist Liberal!!!!!!!!!
You seem to support those who would obstruct efforts to clarify whether the 2020 election was stolen, even though that obstruction serves to undermine the very foundations of our Democracy.
The motivation of many, perhaps most, of those is movement toward Communism. What is your motivation in supporting them?
quote:Right.
It’s not hard to see how a guy who is widely disliked and couldn’t even hit a 50% approval rating could lose an election
Is it "not hard" to envision how a senile shell of what was a past severely failed POTUS candidate supposedly garnered 12 million more votes than any candidate in US history?
Is it "not hard" to envision how a candidate who couldn't get more than 50-100 supporters to rallies supposedly garnered 12 million more votes than any candidate in US history?
Is it "not hard" to see how a candidate who lost 18 of the country's 19 so-called 'bellwether' counties (counties whose vote historically goes for the candidate who wins the election, in this case 18 of 19 would spell landslide) supposedly still won an election, and won with the most votes of any candidate in US history?
Posted on 8/2/22 at 4:45 pm to ronricks
quote:
It’s not hard to see how a guy who is widely disliked and couldn’t even hit a 50% approval rating could lose an election
His approval ratings were tracking better than Obama's at the same times late in his first term. He literally took Latino, black, and Asian votes away from the dems. The only people who didnt "like" him, were people like you.
So yes. It kinda IS hard to see.
Unless you really believe that democrats saw a natural, massive, 23+% increase in turnout... more than the entire populations of Utah, Iowa, Nevada, Arkansas, and Mississippi COMBINED...and almost exclusively in b battleground states.. purely due to making voting "easier". How fricking lazy are dems if that's true?
This post was edited on 8/2/22 at 4:52 pm
Posted on 8/2/22 at 5:00 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
And nothing will happen. Until we get some republicans in power that are not afraid to do what is needed nothing will change.
That’s why they hate 45. He didn’t care if their pantries got in a wad
That’s why they hate 45. He didn’t care if their pantries got in a wad
Posted on 8/2/22 at 5:23 pm to ronricks
quote:
Your links…did a 5th grader build those websites? Yikes. What an obscure piece of crap those links are.
and yet here you are and still cannot disprove any of those happenings of fact.
just like any other leftwing jagoff here. and stop saying you are not left wing. give it up. you are at least a RINO at best.
This post was edited on 8/2/22 at 5:27 pm
Posted on 8/2/22 at 7:04 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
The OP is literally about someone deleting the proof, and here you are demanding proof.
This is well put.
Page 11 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News