re: Maricopa AZ Audit. What’s happening there?

quote:

---

Got that talking point from the MSM I see. The AUDIT, which is not the same as a recount, uncovered large scale voter fraud. Examples included poorly done photocopied ballots, thousands of duplicate ballots, electronic records deleted. I guess no one gives a shite because nothing was done about it. They confirmed what this canvassing effort found. Bear in mind that this was only one county and there is major stink coming from others like towns with 1000 potential voters having recorded 2000 votes. quote: Arizona Citizens Investigation Discovers Thousands of Phantom Voters in State – Up to 30% of Addresses in Investigation Were Fraudulent

---

These facts are not what liberals want to hear. Get ready for the usual, no standing, lost lawsuits and no evidence rant. Still have problems in Georgia and Wisconsin to be solved but it’s normal to have ballots unfolded, on thin paper and in suitcases under tables. Democrats are pieces of shite.

quote:

---

They identified thousands of duplicates and triples. That’s not an irregularity

---

That's a known voting procedure guys. Part of their adjudication process.

quote:

---

mean, they wiped the data the day before the audit.

---

Took a backup to their backup location is what you meant to say. And then wiped machine to prep for next election as the process dictates?

Take the red pill next time.

quote:

---

These facts are not what liberals want to hear. Get ready for the usual, no standing, lost lawsuits and no evidence rant. Still have problems in Georgia and Wisconsin to be solved but it’s normal to have ballots unfolded, on thin paper and in suitcases under tables. Democrats are pieces of shite.

---

and most these GOpers in charge are cucks anyway. see raffensperger in GA and plenty in arizona. that however does not change the facts like some want. the SCOTUS not taking it up does not change all the fraud either or make it go away or make all these states who broke their own election laws go away either.

here is the evidence

Iirc, Oklatard claimed at one point to be a conservative. Yet, his posts are perpetually full of MSM (leftist) talking points.

quote:

---

Iirc, Oklatard claimed at one point to be a conservative. Yet, his posts are perpetually full of MSM (leftist) talking points

---

I'm in the middle. I lean conservative on some issues and very liberal on others.

I don't care for gun control and would love to see the budget balanced. I'm just more realistic about raising taxes and don't necessarily want it allocated as the republicans do.

quote:

---

I think the idea that this thing was fully auditable was a false premise.

You could maybe audit bits and pieces, here and there, but the full data package needed to re-create the results was never there.
If you don't have a system where you can gather the data and produce the same result over and over, that system isn't auditable.

If you have a system that's not auditable then it is perfectly reasonable to assume that it is a corrupted and fraudulent system, and that none of the results from that system should be trusted.

---

Not only this ^^^^ but the Dim election technicians have muddied up the audit attempts and have definitely destroyed evidence but like all the other corruption that’s occurred over the past 10-15 years not a damn person is held accountable.

quote:

---

there is major stink coming from others like towns with 1000 potential voters having recorded 2000 votes.

---

go ahead and provide the towns names and county and state. lets see the official results.
ban yourself when you admit you have no actual evidence. no example.
hot air.
the more i think about the propaganda you posted the more I wonder whether you delusionary right wing posters bother to think through the story.
if 1000 were registered and 2000 voted then exactly how did the extra 1000 votes get recorded? far fetched garbage.
get out of here with lame nonsense. make up your own lies so they hold water. this one is unbelievable.