- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/10/22 at 8:16 am to BBONDS25
quote:
No one has been more consistently wrong on this site than you, Otto.
oh look.
two debate errors in one weak assed post.
ad hominem
whataboutism (vague and unsupportable but hey it is not intended to be truth.
its another deflection.
you there barry.
try to explain the propaganda that towns plural with 1000 registered counted 2000 anyway.
try.
This post was edited on 1/10/22 at 8:18 am
Posted on 1/10/22 at 8:17 am to Chazreinhold
Demo SOP. He said/She said. Deny/deflect and stall. Sue. Ignore opposition Court Rulings. Plan for an even bigger cheat, so the last one looks small. Keep Border open for ultimate "fundamental change". Rinse and repeat.
Posted on 1/10/22 at 8:29 am to oklahogjr
quote:
That's a known voting procedure guys. Part of their adjudication process.
Counting votes twice or three times is a known process? Jesus Christ.
If Joe Biden was banging your wife and you walked in, and told you he was checking her temperature, you would probably believe every word.
Posted on 1/10/22 at 8:38 am to CelticDog
quote:
two debate errors in one weak assed post. ad hominem whataboutism (vague and unsupportable but hey it is not intended to be truth.
Whataboutism seems to be your new favorite deflection, but you don’t quite understand its origins or what it means. And it isn’t ad hominem if it is 100 percent correct. And it is. Nobody has been more consistently wrong than you. From predicting trump wouldn’t finish 4 years to consistently predicting criminal convictions, you are just always wrong.
This post was edited on 1/10/22 at 9:22 am
Popular
Back to top

1




