re: Many Want the Filibuster Repealed for the SAVE Act - This Would Have Dire Consequences

quote:

---

Eliminating it for SAVE Act would likely lead to retaliation when Democrats regain the majority (on issues like voting rights, guns, climate, etc.).

---

Were you asleep during the last administration? If not for Sinema and Manchin they'd have already eliminated it. And let's not forget democrat activist following Senema into bathrooms to badger and intimidate her and showing up at Manchin's boat to try to threaten him when they wouldn't go along with abolishing the filibuster.

Retaliation? What a joke, dude. Such a disingenuous post. They'll do it regardless and you know that.

quote:

---

Sometimes we have to put our principles above party.

---

If only the Democratic Socialists could bring themselves to do just that^^^.

quote:

---

Dims will do it regardless if they get control of the Senate. Do it now to keep that from happening.

---

If they did, you wouldn't hear a peep about it from RFK.

Retaliate when they have power.? When they have powete, they will do it ANYWAY, no matter what. Stop pretending that they have any restraint when it comes to "any means necessary ".

quote:

---

I just get tired of this narrative that everything is an immediate emergency in order to justify discarding something as established as the filibuster and that the world ends when Dems get power. And, yes, both sides do this.

---

Your point is solid in a general way. The tired game is to frame everything an emergency or existential threat, in order to frighten the retards. But it's misplaced with regard to the Save Act. We really do need to address registration and voting, and yes - it's an urgent need given the risk Dem's pose on this particular piece of legislation.

quote:

---

RFK

---

Per usual I stopped right here and downvoted without reading a single word of whatever bullshite it is you wrote this time.