- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Looks like it may be down to Amy Barrett or Brett Kavanaugh for Supreme Court pick
Posted on 7/2/18 at 11:22 am to Tchefuncte Tiger
Posted on 7/2/18 at 11:22 am to Tchefuncte Tiger
quote:
You know McCain's replacement will not vote to confirm, nor Jeff Flake. Then you have your folks like Susan Collins, so there are three "no" votes from the RINO Caucus.
I disagree that McCain's replacement won't vote to confirm anyone that Trump nominates. The article I read about McCain possibly announcing his retirement on the 4th stated he wanted to make sure there was someone there who could vote for the nominee since it is so important to the party.
1
Posted on 7/2/18 at 11:25 am to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
The joke is on you , both parties certainly do not care if their hypocrisy is obvious.
FIFY
FIFY
Posted on 7/2/18 at 11:27 am to MFn GIMP
bullshite. McCain only cares about McCain.
Him resigning means that he wants to ensure his wife gets the seat rather than having people promise she get it and him not living to ensure it.
If she votes against the nominee, I suggest Mitch withhold all committee seats from her.
Him resigning means that he wants to ensure his wife gets the seat rather than having people promise she get it and him not living to ensure it.
If she votes against the nominee, I suggest Mitch withhold all committee seats from her.
Posted on 7/2/18 at 11:28 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Trump does not need to go with a centrist. He needs a hardcore conservative.
Posted on 7/2/18 at 11:29 am to Placebeaux
Why should you party with Catholics? Every time there is four of them, there isn’t a fifth too far away.
Posted on 7/2/18 at 11:32 am to FooManChoo
quote:
Roman Catholics
While your stated reason of preference is a good enough answer, do I detect a slight fear of history repeating itself?
Posted on 7/2/18 at 11:32 am to FooManChoo
quote:
Yes. I'd prefer a Conservative Protestant over a Roman Catholic.
quote:
Yes. What makes you think I'm anti-first amendment by expressing my displeasure about their religious affiliation?
quote:
Yeah, we're all bigots. I'm honest that I prefer certain individuals and groups over others.
So it's okay for you to have your religious beliefs (however tainted with blind hatred they may be), but not a Supreme Court Justice? So tell me Mr. Cromwell, how do think a Conservative Catholic Justice would interpret the constitutionality of a law any different that a Conservative Protestant?
This post was edited on 7/2/18 at 11:33 am
Posted on 7/2/18 at 11:33 am to FooManChoo
quote:
I have a personal preference towards Conservative Protestants
Well, I do as well, but there are far more Catholics sitting as judges, at least when you get further up, than there are Protestants, right?
I wonder what would happen were Trump to nominate Jay Sekulow?
Posted on 7/2/18 at 11:34 am to saints5021
Dem want another women on a SCOTUS so if Trump picks her and they vote no on her.. Trump will not once but twice.. Cause mostly they will not there seats back in Nov and we take over the seat and get our person on the court.
Posted on 7/2/18 at 11:36 am to FooManChoo
quote:Same here, but I'm just glad we'll get a Conservative of any kind.
I'd prefer another Conservative Protestant
Posted on 7/2/18 at 11:36 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Don't overlook the Georgia Peach
Posted on 7/2/18 at 11:37 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Kavanaugh is a bit more centrist and Ivy League, while Barrett has a more pure conservative paper trail
Whoever is appointed is likely to be the deciding factor on whether assault weapon bans are constitutional and is the 2A restricted to "hunting" firearms.
Posted on 7/2/18 at 11:37 am to ngadawg250
This Roman Catholic cuck is too much on this Monday morning
Posted on 7/2/18 at 11:38 am to ngadawg250
quote:Not really. The 1st amendment wouldn't allow for history to repeat itself regarding the RC vs Protestant schisms and persecutions (on both sides). I'm an ideological and religious bigot.
While your stated reason of preference is a good enough answer, do I detect a slight fear of history repeating itself?
Posted on 7/2/18 at 11:39 am to teke184
quote:
Why should you party with Catholics? Every time there is four of them, there isn’t a fifth too far away.
How do you stop a Baptist from drinking all your beer when you go fishing? Take 2 Baptists
Posted on 7/2/18 at 11:40 am to Mrs. Amaro
He is well within reason given what their leader the pope has been preaching
Posted on 7/2/18 at 11:40 am to Tchefuncte Tiger
Anyone who supported the refusal to even give Garland a hearing has no room to complain about delay or obstructionist tactics, although I believe any nominee should receive a fair hearing.
Posted on 7/2/18 at 11:42 am to FooManChoo
quote:
I'm an ideological and religious bigot.
and an honest one...
Posted on 7/2/18 at 11:44 am to tommy2tone1999
quote:Of course anyone and everyone can believe as they please and that includes those aspiring to the highest court. My preference has nothing to do with wanting to force people to believe a certain way.
So it's okay for you to have your religious beliefs, but not a Supreme Court Justice?
quote:My preference is neither blind nor based on hate.
(however tainted with blind hatred they may be)
quote:An individual justice may or may not interpret the Constitution differently. I think there is a greater risk of having the Pope or the RC Church doctrine as a whole guide the justice's opinions on a matter, which I disagree with.
So tell me Mr. Cromwell, how do think a Conservative Catholic Justice would interpret the constitutionality of a law any different that a Conservative Protestant?
Posted on 7/2/18 at 11:44 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Barrett, please.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News