1
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Looks like Iran was behind pilot plot to hijack flyabudabai plane today
Posted on 10/2/26 at 6:24 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Posted on 10/2/26 at 6:24 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
With RAF Fairford, we don't need any more facts. The Brits already showed it wasn't actually terrorism by releasing the suspects so quickly.
You should probably read the news a bit more. The UK arrested several men yesterday in connection with the RAR Fairford incident all with ties to Iran. The people that were originally arrested were part of a dry run operation and several of them were just innocent dupes which is why they were released.
This post was edited on 10/2/26 at 6:26 pm
Posted on 10/2/26 at 6:43 pm to MrLSU
quote:
You should probably read the news a bit more. The UK arrested several men yesterday in connection with the RAR Fairford incident all with ties to Iran. The people that were originally arrested were part of a dry run operation and several of them were just innocent dupes which is why they were released.
I'm always willing to learn, but I follow the news closely.
You sure you aren't exaggerating? According to their official website, as of yesterday, the Counter-terrorism Police had only arrested ONE more person in addition to the 5 they had already released on bail.
Unless you can back up your assertion that "several more men...with ties to Iran" were arrested, I really think you're paid to mislead people.
If I am wrong, I apologize.
The "dry run" speculation doesn't seem any more plausible than the "diesel heist" speculation.
quote:
Further arrest made in RAF Fairford investigation
Counter Terrorism Policing has this afternoon (Thursday 1 October) made a further arrest in the investigation into activity that took place close to RAF Fairford on Sunday.
A 25-year-old man, a dual UK/Iranian national, was arrested in the Borough of Westminster, London, on suspicion of preparation of terrorist acts under Section 5 of the Terrorism Act 2006.*
Searches of two properties have also been carried out in the same area.
Senior National Coordinator for Counter Terrorism Policing Vicki Evans said:
“The investigation into circumstances surrounding events in Gloucestershire is hugely complex, and our specialist teams are interrogating multiple lines of enquiry.
“As we’ve made clear, we’re looking at all possible angles – including possible foreign state involvement. I’d like to thank the public for their continued support and patience whilst we work through this investigation.”
Five men in their 20s, who were arrested on Sunday 27 September, remain on police bail.
Counter Terrorism Policing is appealing to anyone with information which may assist the investigation to report it via gov.uk/ACT or by calling the Anti-Terrorist Hotline on 0800 789 321.
*Note 2015hrs: The age originally published at 1730hrs was 27-years-old – this is not correct and he is 25-years-old. We also published information that a second man had been questioned under caution which is not correct and has been removed. Apologies for any inconvenience.
This post was edited on 10/2/26 at 6:44 pm
Posted on 10/2/26 at 7:40 pm to PaulDrake
quote:
Just following through on what they are allowed to preach here in the USA.
The Quran’s Sura 5:33 says about infidels, “They shall be slain or crucified, or have their hands and feet cut off.”
Sura 9:5 says, “Slay the infidels wherever you find them ... and lie in wait for them ... and establish every stratagem (of war against them). ”
Sura 47:4-9 promises paradise to whoever cuts off the head of an infidel.
Well, the American government has been diligently working with the MSM to divide the people. The project, obviously well coordinated, has another player whose religion provides instruction regarding death to the non-believers. That religion is protected by the 1st Amendment and the U. S. government, with a complicit MSM, goes out of its way to make sure that religion gets a greater degree of such protection than all others.
Those petro dollars are biting us in the A$$!!
Times are getting extremely interesting.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 10:11 pm to Jbird
quote:
Weird
Want instant facts in one topic
Wait for data in others
Hmmmmm...as predicted, we already know the identity of the FlyDubai attacker.
Well look at that...none of the 5 really spooky guys released in the RAF Fairford "incident" have been identified, yet.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 10:21 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Identified to you?
Ffs
Ffs
Posted on 10/2/26 at 10:30 pm to Jbird
Yes. Just to me....and ABC, WSJ.....
quote:
Multiple sources familiar with the investigation identified the suspected attacker as 29-year-old Hamam Al Hammami.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 10:37 pm to IvoryBillMatt
And that means what exactly?
Posted on 10/2/26 at 10:57 pm to Jbird
quote:
And that means what exactly?
Call it the IBM rule: Governments release information according to their narrative, not for transparency.
Here, Israeli or US sources leaked the name because the narrative is Muzzies hate Jews and are dangerous.
In RAF Fairford---despite Trump saying "we had these guys under investigation," and "we caught them before they blew up the base"---the identities haven't leaked because they're not terrorists.
Whether or not RAF Fairford were a false flag, the handling of it has already accomplished the same purpose, whipping up fear of Iranians by a gullible public. It doesn't serve any governmental interest to identify the Fairford 5.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 7:42 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:Except the UAE?
Call it the IBM rule: Governments release information according to their narrative, not for transparency.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:39 am to Jbird
quote:
Except the UAE?
Where did I say that? Do you EVER have a factual rebuttal to what I write?
I'm just contrasting the Fairford incident and the FlyDubai attacker.
With Fairford, you have the President stating his conclusion before the facts are known...which means the facts will never be published because they would embarrass the President (see the never-ending Minab School "investigation").
Rational people know that ACTUAL suspected terrorists in the UK are not released on "police bail" soon after their arrest.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:43 am to IvoryBillMatt
Sure you did, you suggested that the UAE running that lead investigation would block Israel and Drumpf from lying.
quote:See back to I need fact released asap
.which means the facts will never be published because they would embarrass the President (see the never-ending Minab School "investigation").
quote:With that shithole country who the frick knows anymore.
Rational people know that ACTUAL suspected terrorists in the UK are not released on "police bail" soon after their arrest.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:54 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Are you satisfied with the Minab School investigation so far? What do you think the hold up is? You think we don't have the target data from all our Tomahawks on that day
Do you think people should give one single solitary shite about how a bunch of snack bars got dead?
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:56 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Well look at that...none of the 5 really spooky guys released in the RAF Fairford "incident" have been identified, yet.
So far all that "proves" is the Coulter rule
Posted on 10/3/26 at 10:27 am to RohanGonzales
quote:
So far all that "proves" is the Coulter rule
So, why do we already know the name of the Omani attacker in the FlyDubai incident which happened three days later?
Posted on 10/3/26 at 10:36 am to DeplorableTerrorizer
quote:
Do you think people should give one single solitary shite about how a bunch of snack bars got dead?
I'm just objectively comparing the differences in our own reporting about killing civilians.
In 1988, we released the investigation to the public 25 days after we killed the civilians. In 2026---with much better data gathering ability---we haven't seen a report over 200 days since the incident.
It would be refreshing to hear the Pentagon just be honest, like you have been. "Of course, we killed those civilians, why do you think we used a double tap?"
Posted on 10/3/26 at 11:15 am to Jbird
quote:
Sure you did, you suggested that the UAE running that lead investigation would block Israel and Drumpf from lying.
What a ridiculous characterization. It hadn't occurred to me until right now that you might be stupid, not just dishonest.
The UAE can't keep Israel and Trump from potentially lying. For all we know now, Israel and Trump might be telling the truth. IF they lie, though, an independent UAE report would undercut the CREDIBILITY of their lies.
quote:
See back to I need fact released asap
This is one of those "I can't tell if you're stupid or just dishonest" moments. The Pentagon knew within hours that those two Tomahawks that killed the children, teachers, parents, and first responders in the double tap on the Minab School were ours. Duh, targeting data.
As for producing a report, in July, Trump made it clear on Fox News that that wasn't happening on his watch. His dishonesty is a thing to behold.
It's worth watching the brief clip with Fox contained in this article:
New Republic: Trump Says We Might Never Know about Minab (We do)
Here's ChatGPT's summary:
quote:
found the exchange you’re referring to. It is from the Fox News interview aired July 14, 2026, and the relevant portion is near the end of the Minab discussion.
Trump says:
“I don’t think anybody’s gonna ever be able to say what happened there. Because if they don’t know by now, and as of a couple of weeks ago they didn’t know, and while things like that happen in war, there were missiles flying all over the place. And I don’t know how anybody could say that we shot it.”
The question immediately preceding it was about whether the administration would release the findings of the investigation.
That is the passage that subsequent reporting has characterized as Trump saying we may never know who was responsible for the Minab school strike.
This post was edited on 10/3/26 at 11:50 am
Posted on 10/3/26 at 12:07 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Independent UAE report?
Ffs
Ffs
Posted on 10/3/26 at 12:36 pm to MrLSU
quote:
Indian Captain Smit Machchar reportedly suffered critical injuries after his Omani co-pilot allegedly attacked him
There are some "Anti-Jeet-ers" who won't like this one but!
Posted on 10/3/26 at 1:12 pm to Jbird
quote:
Independent UAE report?
Probably stupid to try to engage you in a factual discussion, but why are you skeptical?
Do you think they lack the technical resources? This isn't a complicated investigation. All the witnesses are alive. The attacker is apparently cooperating. All of the flight data is readily available.
Do you think the UAE will let the American and Israeli investigators dominate?
Doesn't seem like there's a dispute about what happened. The only thing to investigate is WHY it happened.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 1:13 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Why am I skeptical?
It's the very fricking reason I asked if you ever dealt with,Abu Dhabi or Dubai.
It's clear your hinting they are more trustworthy than Israel or the US.
For that reason alone I know you're a fricking hack.
Every fricking Arab country I ever dealt with is corrupt and bullshite artists.
It's the very fricking reason I asked if you ever dealt with,Abu Dhabi or Dubai.
It's clear your hinting they are more trustworthy than Israel or the US.
For that reason alone I know you're a fricking hack.
Every fricking Arab country I ever dealt with is corrupt and bullshite artists.
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News