Started By
Message

re: looking for the graphic of large spike in dem votes in 2020 compared to 2016 and 2024

Posted on 11/13/24 at 11:32 am to
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
131102 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 11:32 am to
quote:

looking for the graphic of large spike in dem votes in 2020


The problem relative to 2024 is the votes are still being counted. But anomalies associated with 2020, both voting patterns and count, were profound
Posted by RaginCajunz
Member since Mar 2009
6577 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 11:35 am to
quote:

Because you wanted the incomplete, misleading, incorrect chart out there online so people will be confused and have their mind made up when the real data comes in?



no because I'm at fricking work you retard and didn't have the time to update. But I found a few minutes for you. Enjoy
Posted by Hoops
LA
Member since Jan 2013
7307 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 11:35 am to
The total in 2020 was an outlier to previous totals also though. Honestly we need to get after these states that have shown their incompetence.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
36952 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 11:37 am to
quote:

This is something I tossed together 2 days after the election based on 10 minutes of Wikipedia numbers. Election totals at that point, so take it for what its worth.
2000 - 2004 is almost the exact same % spike (~16%).
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
36952 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 11:39 am to
quote:

The total in 2020 was an outlier to previous totals also though.
Not really
Posted by Meauxjeaux
98836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
43504 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 11:40 am to
Really though
Posted by Flapjacks
Member since Oct 2023
119 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 11:43 am to
quote:

So we start the Y axis at 50 Million instead of 0. Jesus yall are so easily manipulated by data


We could start it at 0 but then it would be all smooth up top, like your brain. Choosing a standard distribution in order to detect trends and outliers is statistics 101.
Posted by RaginCajunz
Member since Mar 2009
6577 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 11:47 am to


Base of zero. Trendline is a running average which is obviously thrown off by the 2020 spike.
Posted by rwestmore7
Member since Nov 2007
824 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 11:49 am to
Try to manipulate this





well i suck at posting images but this is Pennsylvania and Georgia results
This post was edited on 11/13/24 at 11:50 am
Posted by RaginCajunz
Member since Mar 2009
6577 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 11:54 am to
Does that tiny graphic show where Elon's space lasers changed the votes?
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
36952 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 11:57 am to
quote:

Really though
What's your explanation for almost the exact same size jump from 2000 - 2004 as compared to 2016 - 2020?
Posted by Hoops
LA
Member since Jan 2013
7307 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

What's your explanation for almost the exact same size jump from 2000 - 2004 as compared to 2016 - 2020?


I was young and don’t really remember that era politically. I’d like to hear this also
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
36952 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 12:11 pm to
quote:


I was young and don’t really remember that era politically. I’d like to hear this also
W really triggered the left + Iraq War + the contested election of 2000 that went all the way to SCOTUS drove voters out in massive quantities.

Basically, same thing as 2020 - Trump triggers the left + covid + George Floyd.

The idea that the increase in turnout was necessarily both unprecedented AND evidence of frickery has always been non-evidence-based.
Posted by Hoops
LA
Member since Jan 2013
7307 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 12:16 pm to
That makes sense BUT let’s not act like there isn’t frickery often. I’ve had patient actually tell me about someone “giving me a gift card to fill out my ballot and they even came to the house” like the person was just being nice.
Posted by RaginCajunz
Member since Mar 2009
6577 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 12:18 pm to
Let's get national voter ID laws passed and see what the numbers do
Posted by Sneauxghost
Member since Sep 2020
1206 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 12:26 pm to
It looks like they still cheated but not to win. Just to give Kamala enough votes to make their system look legit. She was at a 70-30 disadvantage in many polls. If they reported the election with that ratio, they would be outed as liars. Also they need the election to look legit now so the cheating systems will not be dismantled before the next election. They don’t want bills passed that would jeopardize the cabals future. This is getting more interesting all the time.
Posted by rwestmore7
Member since Nov 2007
824 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 12:36 pm to
I've never claimed that and in fact I've been calling the idiots out on other social media platforms who are trying to claim that Elon stole it.
Posted by Hoops
LA
Member since Jan 2013
7307 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 1:26 pm to
Wish I had a million upvotes
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
24899 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 1:31 pm to
Thank you deathvalley71.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
36952 posts
Posted on 11/13/24 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

It looks like they still cheated but not to win. Just to give Kamala enough votes to make their system look legit.
We've officially moved the goalposts into outer space.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram