- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Looking back at the Alex Jones trial.
Posted on 6/4/24 at 4:39 pm to Indefatigable
Posted on 6/4/24 at 4:39 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
You consistently refuse to actually state your beliefs on any relevant topic
The nuances of my beliefs are irrelevant to the point that I made. I get that it's frustrating that I limit your ability to construct your straw man, but that isn't my problem.
Posted on 6/4/24 at 4:40 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
nuances of my beliefs
Posted on 6/4/24 at 4:41 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:brother this whole discussion is you saying free speech is absolute and the law says otherwise.
The nuances of my beliefs are irrelevant to the point that I made. I get that it's frustrating that I limit your ability to construct your straw man, but that isn't my problem.
you lost it's over nothing you say arguing it is absolute is true, nothing.
you may think it's true and at this point i'd love to see you test the theory out
Posted on 6/4/24 at 5:05 pm to Byron Bojangles III
quote:
brother this whole discussion is you saying free speech is absolute and the law says otherwise.
What does the Constitution say?
quote:
you lost it's over nothing you say arguing it is absolute is true, nothing.
This means nothing coming from two people who had to be walked through the branches of government.
Posted on 6/4/24 at 5:17 pm to Indefatigable
Thanks for again proving me right 
Posted on 6/4/24 at 5:26 pm to mwade91383
quote:
If you think goofy totally unrelated anecdotes are somehow a valid defense in a courtroom setting, boy oh boy do I have a surprise for you!
Perhaps you overlooked the third and sixth paragraph I typed out?
Alex Jones' Constitutionally protected and guaranteed civil rights were egregiously violated. First and Eighth Amendments, infringed and ignored.
Let's not choose to focus on the anecdotal yet incontrovertible evidence of hypocrisy within the established systems, but instead hone in on the larger point I was making... That AJ has been Constitutionally raped by the very system designed explicitly to protect his inherent liberties. Same thing with J6ers and Trump along with his allies. If even half of the persecution and lawfare being weaponized against Trump had been pointed at BHO after he left office, the ACLU probably would have already had their masses of sheep and puppets raze this entire globe to the ground. And was there ample evidence to charge BHO with crimes? See "Fast and Furious" for starters, and then go down the rabbit hole from there.
Pointing out satellite secondary and tertiary issues still within the basic judicial spectrum in my response, doesn't make the premise of my remarks any less valid.
Posted on 6/4/24 at 5:27 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
What does the Constitution say?
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
The word "absolute" is conspicuously missing. If you think the Alex Jones trial was unconstitutional you should file your own lawsuit.
Posted on 6/4/24 at 5:29 pm to Byron Bojangles III
quote:
The word "absolute" is conspicuously missing.
So is the word "limit."
Posted on 6/4/24 at 5:33 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Be nice....I appreciate that to some degree....but if I was a Sandy Hook family my first instict would be violence. But I would settle for ruining him financially.
Posted on 6/4/24 at 5:40 pm to Byron Bojangles III
quote:
this isn't satire holy shite
Just another ignorant person. Try checking out all the things he foretold was coming, not by guessing, but by reading stuff no one else does.
So, if he tells you 20 years ago they have farms where they are harvesting human organs by growing them in pigs, then in 2018 we can see the very same thing in actual press clippings, was he crazy, or are you just not informed?
So, is it true that they are turning frogs gay? Well, READ its now known that the stuff the Gov. are putting in to our water supplies is why we are having such an uptick in Homosexual kids. People like you are the ignorant ones
Posted on 6/4/24 at 5:41 pm to ThuperThumpin
quote:
Be nice....I appreciate that to some degree
quote:
but if I was a Sandy Hook family my first instict would be violence. But I would settle for ruining him financially.
...and I understand that.
However, I tend to lean away from allowing emotion and government to override natural rights.
The caveman part of my brain would love about 10 minutes of anything goes with those cowards from WBC, but that's not how we should do things.
This post was edited on 6/4/24 at 5:43 pm
Posted on 6/4/24 at 5:42 pm to saintslsupels
You commies have tasted fascism and boy do you love it
Posted on 6/4/24 at 5:43 pm to TigerAxeOK
But no such thing ever happened. And no court (to date) agrees with you at all.
If you read the case, you’d know this. He lost because he withheld/destroyed evidence. His rights were (and still are) intact.
Defamation is not a right.
If you read the case, you’d know this. He lost because he withheld/destroyed evidence. His rights were (and still are) intact.
Defamation is not a right.
Posted on 6/4/24 at 5:45 pm to mwade91383
quote:
So what happened to all those families (whose children were brutally murdered) because of that opinion?
You think children were murdered because of his opinion?
Posted on 6/4/24 at 5:51 pm to moneyg
Nope. And that’s not what the case is about.
Have you read it? Maybe start there.
Have you read it? Maybe start there.
Posted on 6/4/24 at 5:58 pm to mwade91383
quote:
Serious question, have you ever read about the actual case?
Nope. Did he shoot them?
Posted on 6/4/24 at 6:02 pm to HoopsAurora
Maybe read it.
It’ll probably clear up a lot of tough questions you're struggling with.
It’ll probably clear up a lot of tough questions you're struggling with.
Posted on 6/4/24 at 6:33 pm to mwade91383
quote:
Maybe read it.
It’ll probably clear up a lot of tough questions you're struggling with.
I'm not struggling with anything.
Posted on 6/4/24 at 7:01 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
quote: Wrong. Alex Jones isnt just sowing distrust in the government for shits and giggles. $$$$ Jones is a classic manipulator.
Wait, youre telling me that he actually wants to grow his business and make money? Youre only principled if you are preaching from your cardboard box
Posted on 6/4/24 at 7:14 pm to HoopsAurora
Well you keep asking the same stupid question so you’re clearly struggling with something.
Given that, hard to imagine you have any kinda grasp on this thing.
Given that, hard to imagine you have any kinda grasp on this thing.
Popular
Back to top



2






