Started By
Message

re: Liberals celebrating Department of Energy's defiance

Posted on 12/14/16 at 7:41 am to
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
52405 posts
Posted on 12/14/16 at 7:41 am to
quote:

looking at significant increases in uranium prices



The Russians will give us a good deal on uranium, I hear they bought a big stockpile a few years back.
Posted by germandawg
Member since Sep 2012
14135 posts
Posted on 12/14/16 at 7:49 am to
The DoE is a traditional conservatives perfect agency..Jimmy Carter, the original privatizer in chief, started the agency from day one to be a marriage of government oversight and private sector management. The problem is that no one ever considers the lobbying efforts of the private sector which is profiting from such a marriage...so they have lobbied and worked hard to increase their footprint and their influence. They would love to have less oversight and that is what Trump and Perry will provide them....and that is a good thing for anyone who sees all government as all bad all the time.

The core function of the DoE will not go away as long as we are a nation with nuclear weapons. What will go away, and has gone away already to the point of absurdity, is any sort of oversight. And if you think for a second that the capital that is involved in the the DoE complex from the private sector is going to allow Trump and Perry to get in their sand box and do anything other than eliminate oversight you have lost your fricking mind. You can either allow the foxes to run the hen-house or you can pretend their is a dog keeping the foxes at bay but you are either going to have the hen-house or your chickens are going to get eaten by any manner of predators....
Posted by germandawg
Member since Sep 2012
14135 posts
Posted on 12/14/16 at 7:50 am to
No he hasn't...but the secretary has been a scientist educated and trained in the work that the DoE does...
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 12/14/16 at 8:04 am to
quote:

The nuclear WEAPONS program

The military can handle that. No reason for another bureaucratic agency to be involved.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
44435 posts
Posted on 12/14/16 at 8:39 am to
Let's be real here folks, Trump isn't going to eliminate the DoE. Now what I do see him doing, along with Perry, is taking a hard look at the role and function of the various parts of the DoE and making cuts where appropriate. Same with the EPA, and various other executive agencies.

Time to trim the fat, and there is a whole ton of fat sitting inside the beltway in DC.
Posted by Radiojones
The Twilight Zone
Member since Feb 2007
10728 posts
Posted on 12/14/16 at 8:43 am to
I worked for the Dept. of Energy for several years and I can tell you that it is an extremely bloated agency that could probably lose about 80% of it's employees and still accomplish it's mission.
Posted by Pax Regis
Alabama
Member since Sep 2007
14939 posts
Posted on 12/14/16 at 8:48 am to
This defiance will last up until January 21. After that he gets to fire those who don't respond.
Posted by alphaandomega
Tuscaloosa-Here to Serve
Member since Aug 2012
16729 posts
Posted on 12/14/16 at 10:00 am to
quote:

So you're gonna eliminate all 13,000 scientists, researchers, engineers, etc. and hope that Perry can restock it with people knowledgeable enough to run our nuclear program, among other functions, overnight?


Yes I hope so.

And I hope he will kill the Department of Education while he is at it.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
94838 posts
Posted on 12/14/16 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

I think they should look at EPA first.


I've always been of a mind that the functions of the EPA could be split between Energy and Department of the Interior - they've lost their way as the official government agency of the Green (Marxist) movement.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
94838 posts
Posted on 12/14/16 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

And I hope he will kill the Department of Education while he is at it.


I'm for this as well. At worst, there could be a vestigial organ to coordinate grant and other financial aid, and perhaps coordinate states for regional or national standards, but education and schooling should absolutely not be a federal function. It was big government folly to ever go down that road, IMHO.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram