Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Let’s look at the supposed two party system

Posted on 9/30/26 at 11:01 am
Posted by rebeloke
Member since Nov 2012
17350 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 11:01 am
If there are legitimately two parties then why the following:

No obstruction from Republicans
Never Trump crowd from Republicans
No real action for Republicans
Big government from controlling congress and White House from Republicans

The system seems designed for the Democrats to be the permanent majority and the Republicans controlled opposition.

Was there a principled difference between George W Bush and Bill Clinton?

The real question is why are the Democrats so vehemently opposed to the paper tiger Republicans? They never do anything when in power?
Posted by JimEverett
Member since May 2020
2760 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 11:04 am to
quote:

Was there a principled difference between George W Bush and Bill Clinton?


Clinton grew into a deficit hawk. Bush actively pushed deficits.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
40788 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 11:07 am to
quote:



The real question is why are the Democrats so vehemently opposed to the paper tiger Republicans? They never do anything when in power?


The uniparty is made up of 2 marxist factions. Most of it is a show as they have the same goals. The whole 50/50 dynamic is as fake as the 99% dictator elections. Nobody ever questions how almost every single election comes out that way.

In reality, the uniparty makes up about 95% of congress and they always have the votes to do what they want.

Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
40788 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 11:08 am to
quote:

Clinton grew into a deficit hawk. Bush actively pushed deficits.


By grew you mean Ross Perot changed the narrative of the 90s and republicans acted like conservatives and forced Clinton to a balanced budget.

And then Bush shite all over it, the neocons took over the party and everything has gone to hell.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
118249 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 11:47 am to
Yeah, the two parties are the same. That's why New York, Calif, Mass, Wisconsin, etc. are just like Texas, Florida, Tennessee, etc.
Posted by TigerAxeOK
In the woods and by the waters.
Member since Dec 2016
38930 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

Let’s look at the supposed two party system

The Establishment Uniparty.

The bickering and fighting amongst them is panem et circenses. Naught more.
Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
13336 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

Clinton grew into a deficit hawk. Bush actively pushed deficits.




He was smart enough to do what Gingrich told him to. He wasn't a d3eficit hawk. All her cared about was the title so he could use it to get pussy.
Posted by rebeloke
Member since Nov 2012
17350 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 2:03 pm to
Hey Zack. All these conservative senators and representatives from the South that are so much more conservative than the liberal states, how much have they done to advance a conservative agenda?
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
56876 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

Let’s look at the supposed two party system


If the Rs shite the bed and lose the Congress to the Democratic Socialist lunatics there will never be a better time to get serious about forming a third party option.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
92271 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 3:26 pm to
Republicans are mostly pussies and that's why Trump was elected.



Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
118249 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

Hey Zack. All these conservative senators and representatives from the South that are so much more conservative than the liberal states, how much have they done to advance a conservative agenda?

A LOT more than democrats. That's why the parties are not nearly the same. Lemme make it really simple for ya. Here are the grades:
Recent Presidents:
Trump: A
Biden: F
Recent Congress:
GOP: C
DEMS: F
Another way to explain the difference:
a. The GOP Congress wants to take vacations.
b. The DEM Congress wants to make America Communist.
The vacationers are vastly superior.

This post was edited on 9/30/26 at 4:00 pm
Posted by rebeloke
Member since Nov 2012
17350 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 5:10 pm to
So, again, tell me in the case of the Cornell frat boys that gangbanged the past out unconscious coed, the mass text went out to the whole fraternity.

Based on this example you can see simply sticking your hands in your pockets doesn’t exactly get you honorable mention does it?
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
58063 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 6:02 pm to
quote:

No obstruction from Republicans

What does this mean? They certainly obstructed the Democrats’ bills when the Dems had the majorities.
quote:

Never Trump crowd from Republicans

Some Republicans think a guy with Trump’s monomaniacal temperment should not be President.
quote:

No real action for Republicans

Again I’m not sure what this means. Republicans are certainly helping other Republicans to win. You could turn this around and ask why Trump undermined certain Republicans.
quote:

The system seems designed for the Democrats to be the permanent majority and the Republicans controlled opposition.

If so, it isn’t working very well. For the last 50 years government has been fairly balanced between Rs and Ds.
quote:

The real question is why are the Democrats so vehemently opposed to the paper tiger Republicans? They never do anything when in power?

The top tax rate was about 75% when I was young. Republicans lowered it, and other rates, and have kept them relatively low since. They ran off the USSR; they recently shut down illegal immigration; and they recently rejiggered the world’s energy supplies in our favor.

There is a difference between “Everything I want is not happening” and “Nothing is happening.”
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
58063 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 6:37 pm to
quote:

you can see simply sticking your hands in your pockets doesn’t exactly get you honorable mention does it?

He didn’t say it did. He criticized them for “sticking their hands in their pockets”. He simply made the obvious point - to complete your example - that the frat boys with their hands in their pockets, while bad, are far better than the ones that raped the girl.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram