Started By
Message

re: Let’s get a standard of what qualifies for a national emergency

Posted on 1/18/19 at 10:04 pm to
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173651 posts
Posted on 1/18/19 at 10:04 pm to
I don't know if you're being sarcastic but I amplified the numbers to make a point. Let's say 75 cents instead of 3 dollars. People still ok with that?
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
76458 posts
Posted on 1/18/19 at 10:09 pm to
Well ..let's rally around the Constitution.
Posted by flyAU
Member since Dec 2010
24900 posts
Posted on 1/18/19 at 10:10 pm to
quote:

so the next Dem president can’t declare a national emergency and do whatever he/she wants?


There are like 28 current national emergencies active. Trump will not be the catalyst to them thinking they are able to use it.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
85624 posts
Posted on 1/18/19 at 10:12 pm to
Name one that’s been used to enact major policy that has not been able to be done legislatively.

As long as you’re good with President Warren seizing coal plants in 2024 to combat the national emergency that is global warming
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
17467 posts
Posted on 1/18/19 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

It is. Under the law as it is today, Obama could have declared global warming a national emergency and had incredibly powerful options open to him on what he could do unilaterally.


The problem with that is you cannot show any adverse actions to the country.

They would point to drought in California. Has it happened before? Yes. Was it claimed then? No.

They would point to Midwest floods. Has it happened before? Yes. Was it claimed then? No.

They would point to hurricanes. Happened? Yes. Claimed? No.

They would point to winter storms.
Happened? Yes. Claimed? No

Conditions leading to fires.. yes.. no.

Tornados.. yes.. no.

You cannot show, without a doubt, a provable adverse effect of “climate change” so a claim of a national emergency is a no go. It would be like claiming a national emergency over Cuba invading Florida.

“What is the emergency?”

“We are being invaded by Cuba’s navy!!”

“Where?!”

“South Florida!”

“Uhh.. mr president.. that is 10 Cubans on a raft made of plastic drums and duct tape”.

Climate change is basically the same argument. The mythical president says Cubans are on a ship steaming to Key West. Evidence shows it’s a raft taking on water.

Stats are there for defense of the southern border. They were laid out to the speaker and Senate minority leader. The claims are based on actual stats. A discernible amount of money paid to support.... crime stats.... cartel violence near the border... a pathway of drugs into the country to continue to fuel the opioid epidemic..thousands of illegals marching at once on the southern border with no way to prove intent or who is actually in the crowd.

Guns? Little problem with a number 2 in a founding document.


Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47572 posts
Posted on 1/18/19 at 10:19 pm to
Nah. Politics make it impractical. The vast majority of national emergencies do not rise to the caliber of Pearl Harbor. Consider more local issues like Obama declaring a state of emergency over Flints water issues. You really want Senate republicans wiping that away? What if there were a pest epidemic that hobbled the iowa corn industry? Today's House dems wouldn't hesitate to #resist aid to a state Trump expects to carry. It would be painted as political patronage.

The system is fine the way it is. Democrats need to step up and negotiate.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
85624 posts
Posted on 1/18/19 at 10:22 pm to
quote:

Consider more local issues like Obama declaring a state of emergency over Flints water issues. You really want Senate republicans wiping that away? What if there were a pest epidemic that hobbled the iowa corn industry? Today's House dems wouldn't hesitate to #resist aid to a state Trump expects to carry.


Politics would make this impractical as well. If they’re legit emergencies with legit victims then politicians aren’t going to want to be on record opposing them, regardless of party affiliation.

You shouldn’t be able to threaten to declare a national emergency to force someone to the table to negotiate.

Courts shouldn’t be in the business of taking posts like the one above yours and deciding if that is a “national emergency”. That’s wildly speculative, subjective, and turns the courts into overt political animals.

It’s terrible for constituional roles and constraints.
This post was edited on 1/18/19 at 10:24 pm
Posted by timdonaghyswhistle
Member since Jul 2018
21040 posts
Posted on 1/18/19 at 10:27 pm to
Better yet, tell us why this isn't a national emergency.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
85624 posts
Posted on 1/18/19 at 10:29 pm to
because he’s threatening to declare it and has not actually done so yet. Because the GOP held all chambers and the presidency not a year ago and did absolutely nothing to address it.

You guys think you hate Roberts for his ACA decision now? Just wait until this gets to him
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
98030 posts
Posted on 1/18/19 at 10:32 pm to
How is what's going on at the border not an emergency
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47572 posts
Posted on 1/18/19 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

Politics would make this impractical as well. If they’re legit emergencies with legit victims then politicians aren’t going to want to be on record opposing them, regardless of party affiliation.


Are you paying attention? Dems dgaf anymore. The current party platform is repealing tax cuts, russian spy fantasies, perpetual war, and pretending that dhs isnt snagging a half million migrants per year at the border.

You dont have to like it, but its the way it is for a reason. Nothing suggested here would work any better, or be less political.

And lets be honest... you only care about this now because you dont like Trump.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
85624 posts
Posted on 1/18/19 at 10:36 pm to
How is what’s going on with rising sea levels and temperatures not an emergency?

*I don’t actually believe global warming is an emergency, but you’re a fool if you don’t think a Dem admin can’t cherry pick stats and run to the 9th and get it approved. Even if SCOTUS overturns it’s still not the way to structure government and implement policy.*

It’s really, really bad macro policy to have courts deciding this. It invites a trampling over checks and balances.
This post was edited on 1/18/19 at 10:37 pm
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
98030 posts
Posted on 1/18/19 at 10:38 pm to
So build a wall along the coasts

Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
85624 posts
Posted on 1/18/19 at 10:39 pm to
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47572 posts
Posted on 1/18/19 at 10:40 pm to
Illegal border crossings have precipitated an immigrant crisis that costs us tax payers roughly 113b. That's the cost of hurricane Katrina, every single year, and growing.

Yes, it's a national emergency.
Posted by supatigah
CEO of the Keith Hernandez Fan Club
Member since Mar 2004
90056 posts
Posted on 1/18/19 at 10:41 pm to
If trump declared a national emergency to build the wall on powers outlined in national security regulations he still has to withstand the Dems filing a lawsuit. Trump is making the move because he thinks he can win in court. The Dems will have to decide if they want to continue the shutdown to ride out the court case.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
85624 posts
Posted on 1/18/19 at 10:43 pm to
Do you really want to justify it on a micro level?

Now do gun deaths. Now do heart disease and certain types of food.

This is Pandora’s Box and you’re grabbing at the lid because you support this particular policy proposal.

This belongs in the political process in the legislative branch.
This post was edited on 1/18/19 at 10:44 pm
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47572 posts
Posted on 1/18/19 at 10:51 pm to
You're comparing heart disease and a constitutionally protected right to migrants sneaking into the country.

By most estimates, there are as many illegals in the united staes as there are americans with cardiovascular disease. Get some perspective.
quote:


This belongs in the political process in the legislative branch.


Is Trump not trying to do this?
This post was edited on 1/18/19 at 10:53 pm
Posted by jnethe1
Pearland
Member since Dec 2012
17822 posts
Posted on 1/18/19 at 10:53 pm to
Well as the Democrats often say, “if it saves just one life, it’s worth it.”
Lol, but this time it’ll save many lives, save money, and it’ll save our economy from becoming a socialist shithole due to Hispanics voting for socialism.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
85624 posts
Posted on 1/18/19 at 10:53 pm to
I can’t wait to cherry pick stats for you after President Warren’s multiple declarations of national emergencies

But Vach, economic inequality/unaffordable healthcare/ global warming really is an emergency here’s a cherry-picked stat to justify my position
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram