Started By
Message

Ledell Lee case is one reason I can't support the death penalty

Posted on 5/8/21 at 3:14 pm
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162225 posts
Posted on 5/8/21 at 3:14 pm
quote:

The American Civil Liberties Union and the Innocence Project, which are representing Lee's sister, filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit last year. The suit asked the court to order the city of Jacksonville, Arkansas, to release DNA and fingerprints from the scene that the organizations said do not match Lee's.

The ACLU and Innocence Project wanted to test the DNA and fingerprints and run them through national databases, which had not been done before.

In a January 2020 press release, the ACLU said it had found "serious flaws in the evidence used to convict" Lee and identified "DNA evidence that likely belonged to the killer."


We have wrongly killed people in the past and will continue to do so in the future

There is no benefit of supporting the death penalty that can outweigh these tragedies

Another man's DNA found on murder weapon years after execution
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41677 posts
Posted on 5/8/21 at 3:20 pm to
God’s justice is perfect even if the justice of men isn’t.

I support the death penalty and wish it were used more often. Perhaps criminals would think twice about their crimes.
Posted by arcalades
USA
Member since Feb 2014
19276 posts
Posted on 5/8/21 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

Perhaps criminals would think twice about their crimes.


people have been hanged, quartered, etc for 1000's of years and has still only deterred so many. I agree with the OP. Too many people get wrongly convicted. I'd rather spare them all than to see even a couple innocents get executed. The problem with our system is that prosecutors get paid to win, not find the truth.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162225 posts
Posted on 5/8/21 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

I support the death penalty and wish it were used more often.

Even though we sometimes kill the wrong person? As a man of God you see no moral issue with that?
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162225 posts
Posted on 5/8/21 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

people have been hanged, quartered, etc for 1000's of years and has still only deterred so many.

There is 0 evidence that the death penalty is an effective crime deterrent.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41677 posts
Posted on 5/8/21 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

Even though we sometimes kill the wrong person? As a man of God you see no moral issue with that?
Yes. Man isn’t omniscient but must use best judgment in dispensing judgment. God sanctioned the death penalty for fallible men so I don’t see it as a moral issue. What would be immoral is knowingly putting an innocent man to death.

For the Christian, it is enough to know that God is sovereign in the affairs of men. For the non-Christian, there is no ultimate objective basis for saying that the DP is immoral.

I’m satisfied in my convictions.
This post was edited on 5/8/21 at 3:34 pm
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41677 posts
Posted on 5/8/21 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

There is 0 evidence that the death penalty is an effective crime deterrent.
Whether a deterrent or not, it is justice. Those who shed man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162225 posts
Posted on 5/8/21 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

Yes. Man isn’t omniscient but must use best judgment in dispensing judgment. God sanctioned the death penalty for fallible men so I don’t see it as a moral issue. What would be immoral is knowingly putting an innocent man to death.


Keeping a flawed system in place ensures a 100% chance of you eventually putting an innocent person to death though.
Posted by td01241
Savannah
Member since Nov 2012
22848 posts
Posted on 5/8/21 at 3:35 pm to
The law is meant to be a shield not a sword. That said, worrying about this is like worrying about police killing innocent black people. It doesn’t happen anywhere near enough to be used as a catalyst for change imo.
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
15554 posts
Posted on 5/8/21 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

from the scene

Do you know exactly what fingerprints they’re talking about? DNA and fingerprints could’ve been from a visitor wholly unrelated to the incident that was present prior to the killing.

Where was the convicted person’s DNA and fingerprints found? On the murder weapon also? On the body?

You can’t trust the ACLU headlines unless you dig into the facts yourself
This post was edited on 5/8/21 at 3:39 pm
Posted by Crimson K
Tuscaloosa
Member since Dec 2018
4626 posts
Posted on 5/8/21 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

There is 0 evidence that the death penalty is an effective crime deterrent.



Murder and overall crime rates in Saudi Arabia tell a different story.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162225 posts
Posted on 5/8/21 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

Whether a deterrent or not, it is justice.

So you don't care if it has a societal positive outcome?

quote:

Those who shed man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed.


OK so it's just weird irrational blood lust vengeance for you
Posted by red sox fan 13
Valley Park
Member since Aug 2018
15349 posts
Posted on 5/8/21 at 3:38 pm to
I think the death penalty should be used but only for the most severe crimes. Such as mass murder, rape and murder, child rape, stuff like that. Also the accused should be proven completely beyond a reasonable doubt.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162225 posts
Posted on 5/8/21 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

. It doesn’t happen anywhere near enough to be used as a catalyst for change imo.

That would make sense if the death penalty had a benefit that we would be forfeiting. It doesn't.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65090 posts
Posted on 5/8/21 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

God’s justice is perfect even if the justice of men isn’t.


I’m sure this sentiment gives the families of innocent men who have been put to death plenty of solace. I’m only in favor of the death penalty if there is no shite 100% certainty that person committed the crime. There has to be no doubt or question that the defendant is guilty and the offense has to be so grievous and heinous that it’d be like putting down a rabid dog.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41677 posts
Posted on 5/8/21 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

Keeping a flawed system in place ensures a 100% chance of you eventually putting an innocent person to death though.
All judgments involving man are flawed. Technology that we have today makes the judgment more certain than any other time in history.
Posted by td01241
Savannah
Member since Nov 2012
22848 posts
Posted on 5/8/21 at 3:41 pm to
I imagine if say, someone raped and murdered my wife and daughter, I’d find some benefit in knowing they’d find justice. I agree with other posters it should be reserved for certain crimes with 100% guilt but that’s a fantasy.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41677 posts
Posted on 5/8/21 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

So you don't care if it has a societal positive outcome?
I believe the DP has a societal positive outcome. Justice provides a societal positive outcome.

quote:

OK so it's just weird irrational blood lust vengeance for you
Not at all. It’s from the Bible. It is speaking about justice, not vengeance.
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
17895 posts
Posted on 5/8/21 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

We have wrongly killed people in the past and will continue to do so in the future

There is no benefit of supporting the death penalty that can outweigh these tragedies

One thing I can agree with you.

Also, I believe it costs more to get someone executed than it does to warehouse them to their natural death.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41677 posts
Posted on 5/8/21 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

I’m sure this sentiment gives the families of innocent men who have been put to death plenty of solace.
For the Christian, it does provide solace.


quote:

I’m only in favor of the death penalty if there is no shite 100% certainty that person committed the crime. There has to be no doubt or question that the defendant is guilty and the offense has to be so grievous and heinous that it’d be like putting down a rabid dog.
How many times has there been “no doubt” about a verdict only to have additional evidence provide doubt after the fact?

Humans don’t always get it right, but the government still has a responsibility under God to dispense justice.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 26
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 26Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram