- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lawyers present Presidential pardon to Tina Peters's jailers. Colorado: "So?"
Posted on 12/14/25 at 4:13 pm to Bourre
Posted on 12/14/25 at 4:13 pm to Bourre
quote:
I find it interesting that you leftist are so committed to keeping a 70 year old lady in prison while actively cheering on the releasing murderers, rapist, and other hardened criminals back onto the streets.
what?
link to me actively cheering on releasing murderers, rapists and other hardened criminals back onto the streets?
hint - you won't find one
0
Posted on 12/14/25 at 4:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Nope.
Bro you argued that the determination was made via the legal system.
quote:9yrs ... yet no evidence indicates she accessed or took personal voter data, correct?
It's a huge issue when discussing Tina Peters. People just make shite up to make her look good.
Posted on 12/14/25 at 4:17 pm to Motownsix
Another leftist who only believes in “restorative justice” when it comes to hardened criminals and illegal aliens. Actively rooting for a 70 year old lady to die in prison while your side cheers on the release of career criminals is peak hypocrisy
Posted on 12/14/25 at 4:17 pm to Motownsix
quote:
She’s gonna die in Jail
Congrats.
quote:
unless Trump finds a way to ignore the constitution one more time
What were the other times?
Oh…and your thoughts on the 8th amendment?
This post was edited on 12/14/25 at 4:18 pm
Posted on 12/14/25 at 4:21 pm to Motownsix
quote:If only Matthew Dolloff was subject to the same "balanced" legal system.
She broke like 10 laws
Posted on 12/14/25 at 4:26 pm to hogcard1964
Agreed. The liberals say Trump is a king. So I'm ready for him to act like one. At this point, I really don't care how many liberals and neocons they would need to dispatch from this Earth to stop this madness. It's the only solution. Leftists are not human and shouldn't be treated as such.
This post was edited on 12/14/25 at 4:27 pm
Posted on 12/14/25 at 4:43 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
The facts are that they were dismissed on procedural issues…not the merits. Do you understand what that means? Of course I’m going to steer the conversation to the relevant facts. Yeesh.
i'm sorry your fairy tales didn't get their day to be laughed out of court, i really am. it must be difficult to accept you've been duped
Posted on 12/14/25 at 4:44 pm to Dex Morgan
quote:
The liberals say Trump is a king. So I'm ready for him to act like one.
Totally not a cult though.
Posted on 12/14/25 at 4:45 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Nope
Your exact words.
quote:
The latter purported "finding" by a state legal system
Unless you're trying to argue that your quote around "finding" somehow changed it from meaning "determination", Nope was the improper response
quote:
9yrs
Sentencing is a completely different discussion than her guilt or the fantasies made up by the Tina Peters fan club
Once they admit reality and her guilt, THEN we can move to sentencing.
quote:
yet no evidence indicates she accessed or took personal voter data, correct?
She 100% took election data, which I presume included votes, which would involver voter data. I have not reviewed the data dumped by Lindell's boy, personally.
Posted on 12/14/25 at 4:51 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
Totally not a cult though.
Sure they/them , call us whatever you want.
Posted on 12/14/25 at 4:57 pm to Dex Morgan
Plenty of other countries you can go to if you want to have a king.
Posted on 12/14/25 at 4:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:I've asked you a half dozen times what the "findings" you continue to cite, referenced. You've yet to answer directly. If you want to clear up your interpretation of finding vs verdict in this instance, I'll happily respond accordingly.
The latter purported "finding" by a state legal system
quote:In the CO system ... absolutely.
Sentencing is a completely different discussion than her guilt
Care to address that FACT related to the Peters case???
quote:Wait ... what?
I have not reviewed the data
Posted on 12/14/25 at 5:01 pm to beaux duke
quote:
i'm sorry your fairy tales didn't get their day to be laughed out of court, i really am. it must be difficult to accept you've been duped
again. You have no clue if they are fairy tales or not. As the merits were never considered. That’s the entire point. Dummy. Posted on 12/14/25 at 5:03 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
As the merits were never considered
there are no merits to consider
the 2020 stolen election issue is just another donald trump temper tantrum
remember when he cried about how ted cruz must have cheated to have won iowa? same thing
sorry about your fairy tale. it must be humiliating to realize you bought snake oil
Posted on 12/14/25 at 5:07 pm to beaux duke
quote:
it must be humiliating to realize you bought snake oil
A Kamala voter typed this
Posted on 12/14/25 at 5:12 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
If only Matthew Dolloff was subject to the same "balanced" legal system.
Why does everyone, when joining a discussion about Tina Peters, immediately go to facts/situations that have nothing to do with what Tina Peters actually did and what actually happened to Tina Peters?
This post was edited on 12/14/25 at 5:13 pm
Posted on 12/14/25 at 5:14 pm to texag7
quote:
A Kamala voter typed this
do what now?
i wrote in jello biafra like a good goddamn american
This post was edited on 12/14/25 at 5:15 pm
Posted on 12/14/25 at 5:15 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
I've asked you a half dozen times what the "findings" you continue to cite, referenced.
You asked me for her convictions. I provided them earlier.
quote:
. If you want to clear up your interpretation of finding vs verdict in this instance, I'll happily respond accordingly.
There is no distinction in what was presented at her trial and what happened in reality.
quote:
Care to address that FACT related to the Peters case?
Once everyone agrees to the reality of her case and that she's guilty.
THEN we can move onto the discussion of her sentence. Discussing a purportedly overly harsh sentence for an innocent person makes no sense (as the innocence trumps alll).
Posted on 12/14/25 at 5:18 pm to beaux duke
quote:How do you know. Be specific regarding cases such as those in GA which were disallowed based on incorrect judicial interpretations of "standing."
there are no merits to consider
Posted on 12/14/25 at 5:21 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
which were disallowed based on incorrect judicial interpretations of "standing."
why weren't these incorrect interpretations challenged and overturned? seems like an easy task since they're so clearly incorrect
Page 16 of 18
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News