Started By
Message

re: Latest from O'Keefe on the royal family

Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:15 pm to
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140573 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

There was much better evidence released about Andrew a long time ago.


Then add the new John Bryan expose' to the list of evidence.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476599 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

Then add the new John Bryan expose' to the list of evidence.


quote:

Did you have any doubts of that BEFORE this interview?
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
75115 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

WORLD EXCLUSIVE


That fricker missed a huge opportunity to get the jump on the entire UNIVERSE. What an amateur.
Posted by somethingdifferent
Member since Aug 2024
1939 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:19 pm to
quote:

Did you have any doubts of that BEFORE this interview?
Given what happened to Kobe, absolutely I had doubts. The John Bryan angle definitely puts a new spin on it

The Epstein business is one area where I'm starting to grow disappionted with Trump. I get it's an ongoing process but, the botched dossier roll out and lack of prosecutions is starting to look bad. The more this drags out, the more it makes it look like Trump is protecting powerful people. The importance of this O'Keefe story is that it is keeping feet to the fire
Posted by somethingdifferent
Member since Aug 2024
1939 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

shite we knew about 10 years ago
Yeah because there's a line a mile long of journalists who are getting John Bryan on video implicating royals. That story is happening every day, right 14th amendment expert?
Posted by somethingdifferent
Member since Aug 2024
1939 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

Nobody cares about John Bryan
I bet there are some royals who care about him, right 14th amendment expert?
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
23998 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:21 pm to
Prince Andrew has already been shamed and banished as a Royal. We know what he was doing.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140573 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:22 pm to
quote:

The Epstein business is one area where I'm starting to grow disappionted with Trump. I


I hope Trump's close relationship with the now deceased Queen Elizabeth does not sway the investigation into Prince Andrew.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476599 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:22 pm to
quote:

I get it's an ongoing process but, the botched dossier roll out and lack of prosecutions is starting to look bad. The more this drags out, the more it makes it look like Trump is protecting powerful people.


I think the problem is that it's not as widespread as y'all have built it up to be and nothing will satisfy your type. I believe Trump knows the details of the whole thing and understands that it will make people like you think he's part of a cover up/conspiracy. Bondi did not, and look at all the shite she ate for it.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476599 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

Yeah because there's a line a mile long of journalists who are getting John Bryan on video implicating royals.

We don't need "John Bryan implicating royals" for this story.

You can keep pretending that this means anything, but it doesn't.

We already knew all of this, with better evidence, 10 years ago.

Posted by somethingdifferent
Member since Aug 2024
1939 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

The facts are.. you really CAN be rich enough, powerful enough or connected enough to get away with any and everything. Just because that FACT gets pointed out does in no way mean people are okay with that outcome, it just is what it always has been- ultimate privilege.
So is your point that because this is a "non story" O'Keefe should have just deleted the video and not mentioned it?

I'm having trouble understanding what your point is. Yes, 2 tiered justice exists. Should we just drop it, even when kids are invovled?
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
49520 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:24 pm to
Not sure this is a surprise to anyone - maybe it is the most validated version known by the public - but the basic truth has always been substantially believed by anyone with a logical mind. Only thing left to the imagination is nitty gritty details like when and where?
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140573 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

I think the problem is that it's not as widespread as y'all have built it up


This is an accusation out of nowhere.

quote:

nothing will satisfy your type


Accountability. Justice. Those things.
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
96922 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:25 pm to
quote:

But it was denied


They paid a settlement so hard to argue it was denied
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
23998 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:25 pm to
quote:

Should we just drop it, even when kids are invovled?

What happens if WE don't drop it?
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
97991 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:25 pm to
quote:

Prince Andrew has already been shamed and banished


To the Royal Lake Mansion you go Andrew!! Shame
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
21709 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:25 pm to
quote:

So is your point that because this is a "non story" O'Keefe should have just deleted the video and not mentioned it?


No.

My point was that nothing will come of it.

I thought I made that clear, but I typed slower this time so maybe that'll help.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476599 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

Accountability. Justice. Those things.

Epstein and Maxwell were prosecuted. Andrew probably won't be, but he's the only other person that we know of who has strong ties to the illegality.
Posted by somethingdifferent
Member since Aug 2024
1939 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

It's a nothingburger
You are insufferable. A close confidant of the royal family admitting one of the royals commited statutory rape is not a non story and there has absolutely NOT been video evidence like this before. NOBODY has broken a story like this on this case 14th amendment genius and this absolutely puts more pressure on LEO to not protect powerful people

Seems like a fake "small government" person like yourself would be in favor of something like this story
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476599 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:29 pm to
quote:

A close confidant of the royal family admitting one of the royals commited statutory rape is not a non story

It is when this already was a story....10 years ago.

quote:

NOBODY has broken a story like this on this case

You can't "Break" a story that's a decade old.

quote:

this absolutely puts more pressure on LEO to not protect powerful people

You think intoxicated hearsay somehow has more impact on LEO than direct testimony by the victim (there is actual testimony from more than one)?

quote:

Seems like a fake "small government" person like yourself would be in favor of something like this story

This story has nothing to do with the government

I'm never in favor of emotional propaganda, which this release is. It's only going to be promoted by emotional types and idiots.
This post was edited on 5/7/25 at 5:29 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram