- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest from O'Keefe on the royal family
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:15 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:15 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
There was much better evidence released about Andrew a long time ago.
Then add the new John Bryan expose' to the list of evidence.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:16 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Then add the new John Bryan expose' to the list of evidence.
quote:
Did you have any doubts of that BEFORE this interview?
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:17 pm to Night Vision
quote:
WORLD EXCLUSIVE
That fricker missed a huge opportunity to get the jump on the entire UNIVERSE. What an amateur.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:19 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:Given what happened to Kobe, absolutely I had doubts. The John Bryan angle definitely puts a new spin on it
Did you have any doubts of that BEFORE this interview?
The Epstein business is one area where I'm starting to grow disappionted with Trump. I get it's an ongoing process but, the botched dossier roll out and lack of prosecutions is starting to look bad. The more this drags out, the more it makes it look like Trump is protecting powerful people. The importance of this O'Keefe story is that it is keeping feet to the fire
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:20 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Yeah because there's a line a mile long of journalists who are getting John Bryan on video implicating royals. That story is happening every day, right 14th amendment expert?
shite we knew about 10 years ago
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:I bet there are some royals who care about him, right 14th amendment expert?
Nobody cares about John Bryan
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:21 pm to Night Vision
Prince Andrew has already been shamed and banished as a Royal. We know what he was doing.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:22 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
The Epstein business is one area where I'm starting to grow disappionted with Trump. I
I hope Trump's close relationship with the now deceased Queen Elizabeth does not sway the investigation into Prince Andrew.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:22 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
I get it's an ongoing process but, the botched dossier roll out and lack of prosecutions is starting to look bad. The more this drags out, the more it makes it look like Trump is protecting powerful people.
I think the problem is that it's not as widespread as y'all have built it up to be and nothing will satisfy your type. I believe Trump knows the details of the whole thing and understands that it will make people like you think he's part of a cover up/conspiracy. Bondi did not, and look at all the shite she ate for it.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:23 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
Yeah because there's a line a mile long of journalists who are getting John Bryan on video implicating royals.
We don't need "John Bryan implicating royals" for this story.
You can keep pretending that this means anything, but it doesn't.
We already knew all of this, with better evidence, 10 years ago.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:23 pm to SallysHuman
quote:So is your point that because this is a "non story" O'Keefe should have just deleted the video and not mentioned it?
The facts are.. you really CAN be rich enough, powerful enough or connected enough to get away with any and everything. Just because that FACT gets pointed out does in no way mean people are okay with that outcome, it just is what it always has been- ultimate privilege.
I'm having trouble understanding what your point is. Yes, 2 tiered justice exists. Should we just drop it, even when kids are invovled?
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:24 pm to Night Vision
Not sure this is a surprise to anyone - maybe it is the most validated version known by the public - but the basic truth has always been substantially believed by anyone with a logical mind. Only thing left to the imagination is nitty gritty details like when and where?
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I think the problem is that it's not as widespread as y'all have built it up
This is an accusation out of nowhere.
quote:
nothing will satisfy your type
Accountability. Justice. Those things.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:25 pm to GumboPot
quote:
But it was denied
They paid a settlement so hard to argue it was denied
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:25 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
Should we just drop it, even when kids are invovled?
What happens if WE don't drop it?
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:25 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
Prince Andrew has already been shamed and banished
To the Royal Lake Mansion you go Andrew!! Shame
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:25 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
So is your point that because this is a "non story" O'Keefe should have just deleted the video and not mentioned it?
No.
My point was that nothing will come of it.
I thought I made that clear, but I typed slower this time so maybe that'll help.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:26 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Accountability. Justice. Those things.
Epstein and Maxwell were prosecuted. Andrew probably won't be, but he's the only other person that we know of who has strong ties to the illegality.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:You are insufferable. A close confidant of the royal family admitting one of the royals commited statutory rape is not a non story and there has absolutely NOT been video evidence like this before. NOBODY has broken a story like this on this case 14th amendment genius and this absolutely puts more pressure on LEO to not protect powerful people
It's a nothingburger
Seems like a fake "small government" person like yourself would be in favor of something like this story
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:29 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
A close confidant of the royal family admitting one of the royals commited statutory rape is not a non story
It is when this already was a story....10 years ago.
quote:
NOBODY has broken a story like this on this case
You can't "Break" a story that's a decade old.
quote:
this absolutely puts more pressure on LEO to not protect powerful people
You think intoxicated hearsay somehow has more impact on LEO than direct testimony by the victim (there is actual testimony from more than one)?
quote:
Seems like a fake "small government" person like yourself would be in favor of something like this story
This story has nothing to do with the government
I'm never in favor of emotional propaganda, which this release is. It's only going to be promoted by emotional types and idiots.
This post was edited on 5/7/25 at 5:29 pm
Popular
Back to top


1







