Started By
Message

re: Kyle used his COVID Stimulus money to buy the rifle

Posted on 11/17/21 at 10:52 pm to
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
36335 posts
Posted on 11/17/21 at 10:52 pm to
quote:

What a coincidence. I also bought a firearm with stimulus money.


And ammo and crypto
Posted by RBWilliams8
Member since Oct 2009
54026 posts
Posted on 11/17/21 at 10:56 pm to
M1A CQB .308
Posted by Pechon
unperson
Member since Oct 2011
7748 posts
Posted on 11/17/21 at 11:14 pm to
quote:

Probably not one but slippery slope with today's government. Rifle purchases are federal and the form is federal. Who knows how ATF will treat it. I sure wouldn't want to put my freedom in the hands of ATF.


Have you not been paying attention? The ATF already does this. They make up arbitrary rules that continue to inhibit 2nd Amendment rights. It is authoritarian and they infringe on yours and everyone else's freedoms every damn day.

Good example is how the ATF tried to shut down Rare Breed claiming it's FRT-15 trigger makes a rifle into a machine gun despite you still have to pull the trigger to fire subsequent rounds. It just allows for a forced reset of the trigger to fire faster. No different than me modifying my Glock for a better trigger pull allowing me to fire a subsequent shot faster.


The ATF shouldn't exist, period.
This post was edited on 11/17/21 at 11:20 pm
Posted by SeaPro
Louisiana Coast
Member since Oct 2021
164 posts
Posted on 11/17/21 at 11:17 pm to
Did we actually all need that money? No, and again, guess what, you can spend the fricking money any dam way he wanted...just cause he said it doesn't mean he did it. But then again this is a free nation you effing dumbarses

You people are filled with mental illness
This post was edited on 11/17/21 at 11:21 pm
Posted by MississippiLSUfan
Brookhaven
Member since Oct 2005
12591 posts
Posted on 11/17/21 at 11:27 pm to
quote:

Someone is in trouble. Felony to do a straw purchase. He was 17 at the time.


Please look up he statute.

Ur ignotrant.
This post was edited on 11/17/21 at 11:29 pm
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
23551 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:21 am to
There's 'intent', and there's actual deed.

Intent is where it gets murky. Kyle wanted an AR, and he pursued avenues to get one lined up before he was 18. Oooh, sounds bad. He even gave the buyer money. Yikes.

He also made no attempt to take it into his possession, UNTIL he was legally able to own it. He needed to get an FOID card, he was working on that. He was also about to turn 18, the transfer/sale to him would not physically occur until both things happened.

Maybe the store ran a deal on ARs, and they were otherwise hard to come by (which, BTW, they were at the time). "Hey Mr Black, if you buy an extra rifle now, I will buy it from you when I can do so". That in itself isn't a felony, perhaps Mr Black had already considered getting another while he could.

Like I said, intent vs deed- and the interest in Gaige Grosskuentz. He was shot at a riot far away from where he's from, testifying under oath that it occurred only after he pointed the gun he was illegally concealing at another person- one he pursued, yelling "get him".

I want to see attempted murder, illegal carrying of a concealed firearm, assault with a deadly weapon charges. At least consider them. Instead, he gets a DWI dropped.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
38422 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 7:28 am to
quote:

You think that's an actual indicator of whether or not a law has been broken? The ATF? Under this administration on this case?
Is there any other? We (gun owners and buyers) are putting gun purchase laws in the hands of an 18 year old. I don't like that. Demoncrats will make hay over that. Deny it and you are foolish.

We are putting self defense laws in the hands of a 17 year old. They will make hay over that regardless of outcome but more hay than ever if convicted. Deny it but you are foolish if gun rights are not on trial. Preferably, if our rights are tested, a 17 year old is not the leader - got it now?

Right or wrong - all of this is a test and it all began with an 18 year old buying a gun for a 17 year old.

I believe Kyle is innocent based on self defense but I sure wish they would have stayed the hell out of it.

There is not an adult on this board with any responsibility; married, kids, mortgage, car payments, job, reputation in the workforce, that would have gone down town and did what Kyle did. Noble, but I guess only if you are a 17 y/o with no responsibilities at home.

OK - I'm done with my unpopular opinions on Kyle. Hopefully, he doesn't have to serve anymore time.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
28173 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 8:55 am to
quote:

I'm done with my unpopular opinions on Kyle.


It's not that they were unpopular, they were ignorant. There was no straw purchase made, and they were pretty careful about following the law. When people tried to correct you you called them "Kyle worshippers".

The rest of your post is you saying this whole saga is a bad look for gun owners. We might agree on a few things there, but that's a different claim.
Posted by jp4lsu
Member since Sep 2016
6786 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 9:03 am to
Was the gun he used actually his?
I thought it was Black's and he told him to get it out of the basement or something?
Posted by The Quiet One
Former United States
Member since Oct 2013
12149 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 9:05 am to
quote:

Kyle wanted an AR


Kyle actually wanted a shotgun, but the store didn’t have one. So they got the AR-15 instead.

first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram