- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kids are being taken from ‘non-affirming’ parents.
Posted on 10/19/24 at 9:30 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 10/19/24 at 9:30 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
0
Posted on 10/19/24 at 9:31 am to SlowFlowPro
You’re playing semantic games while it’s obvious that Federal policy (whether in the form of letters, lawsuits, etc.) changes things. I don’t know why you’re insistent on being an IYI. You don’t have to be. But you’re committed to it.
Posted on 10/19/24 at 9:31 am to Azkiger
quote:
No, the point you tried to make when you said that Biden had 4 years and didn't create policy
You're crawfishing.
This is what I ressopnded to:
quote:
Do you think the candidate wanting to use federal funds to pay for illegal alien youth gender transition procedures wouldn't also try and push the same sort of legislation
Legislation =/= policy
quote:
That's a shite point to make and I'm glad you conceded it.
Nope.
quote:
When did I say policy was passed?
quote:
Do you think the candidate wanting to use federal funds to pay for illegal alien youth gender transition procedures wouldn't also try and push the same sort of legislation
Exactly my point. They weren't. Legislation is also a lot harder than rulemaking, but I gave you some rope.
Posted on 10/19/24 at 9:31 am to the808bass
quote:
Ackshually.
You just tried to do that to me
Posted on 10/19/24 at 9:32 am to Azkiger
quote:
Never happened.
Review the808bass's posting history.
Posted on 10/19/24 at 9:33 am to SlowFlowPro
Yes. I corrected a shite assertion you made.
We’re still correcting shite assertions you’re making. We can stop when you stop making shite accusations. Or if you’re crying because your feelings are hurt, we can stop because of that. Just let us know.
We’re still correcting shite assertions you’re making. We can stop when you stop making shite accusations. Or if you’re crying because your feelings are hurt, we can stop because of that. Just let us know.
Posted on 10/19/24 at 9:33 am to the808bass
quote:
You’re playing semantic games
This is a crawfish.
I replied specifically to specific posts.
I asked specific questions using intentional language.
You don't get to change what is said to try to make a point. That's intellectual dishonesty, and ad hom name-calling won't change that fact.
Posted on 10/19/24 at 9:34 am to the808bass
quote:
Yes. I corrected a shite assertion you made.
You attempted to and failed to do so.
quote:
Or if you’re crying because your feelings are hurt, we can stop because of that. Just let us know.
When SFP is proven right, the ad hom attacks begin
Posted on 10/19/24 at 9:34 am to SlowFlowPro
You tried to change the metric by which one measures government interaction. You tried to change the topic. You tried to run down a side street to avoid the substance of the conversation. Which is what you always do.
Posted on 10/19/24 at 9:35 am to SlowFlowPro
I start with ad hominem attacks. I don’t resort to them at the end, fig.
Posted on 10/19/24 at 9:36 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
When SFP is proven right,
If you keep shifting the narratives enough, you'll be right at some point.
Posted on 10/19/24 at 9:38 am to the808bass
quote:
You tried to change the metric by which one measures government interaction
Where? By using rules instead of legislation?
I did that to help him. Rules are much easier to come by than legislation, which was the metric he used to measure government interaction.
quote:
You tried to change the topic.
Are you really arguing bureaucratic rules (which are based in legislative powers) are that different from legislation?
Ok, fine.
What legislation was passed?
Will make your job much more difficult, but fine.
Posted on 10/19/24 at 9:39 am to the808bass
quote:
You tried to change the metric
Thats how he "wins."
Posted on 10/19/24 at 9:39 am to djmed
Thats fine, that one is defected.
I can make a new one.
Ya'll keep it.
How I see my great grandfather responding.
I can make a new one.
Ya'll keep it.
How I see my great grandfather responding.
Posted on 10/19/24 at 9:39 am to djmed
Anyone who supports or supported gay marriage should also support this. It's all along the same slippery slope, we warned everyone, and we were called nuts for saying this would follow. Either admit you were wrong about gay marriage or accept this as the new normal. You don't get to live in your make believe neutral zone.
This post was edited on 10/19/24 at 9:40 am
Posted on 10/19/24 at 9:41 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You're crawfishing.
I misspoke.
No, the point you tried to make when you said that Biden had 4 years and didn't create such legislation.
I'm glad you've abandoned that shite point, though.
quote:
Nope.
So how do you explain the states who didn't remove children from non-affirming parents for decades now doing it? Your logic says people shouldn't have been worried about it happening because it hadn't happened before.
Posted on 10/19/24 at 9:44 am to burger bearcat
quote:
Anyone who supports or supported gay marriage should also support this.
No. That's not logical.
Removing government barriers and decreasing the size of government (gay marriage) is nothing like supporting an overbearing, large, and intrusive government (this story).
Posted on 10/19/24 at 9:46 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What does Trump have to do with this, specifically?
I know MAGA likes to play the "abortion is a state issue exclusively" (which likely isn't correct) card to thwart discussion on abortion in the Presidential race, but this is literally a "exclusive state issue" example.
A person can easily be against this behavior at the state/local level and not support Trump, because there is no overlap.
So let me get this straight...
Despite Kamala wanting to use federal dollars to fund illegal immigrant child transition procedures, and despite progressive states removing children from "non-gender affirming parents", and despite numerous federal agencies that deal with health and child welfare state their stances are that it's harmful for children to remain with "non-gender affirming parents", you feel the need to step into a conversation about "what if" Kamala is able to push this crap at a federal level with the intent to derail it?
Does that about sum it up?
This post was edited on 10/19/24 at 9:48 am
Posted on 10/19/24 at 9:47 am to Azkiger
quote:
No, the point you tried to make when you said that Biden had 4 years and didn't create such legislation.
I'm glad you've abandoned that shite point, though.
That was YOUR point, bubba, but you "misspoke". You are the one who said "legislation" and I replied to your words.
You now claiming you "misspoke" and removing "legislation" off the table of the discussion is you abandoning the point.
This is what I actually posted:
quote:
What does Trump have to do with this, specifically?
I know MAGA likes to play the "abortion is a state issue exclusively" (which likely isn't correct) card to thwart discussion on abortion in the Presidential race, but this is literally a "exclusive state issue" example.
A person can easily be against this behavior at the state/local level and not support Trump, because there is no overlap.
This is what you actually replied with:
quote:
o you think the candidate wanting to use federal funds to pay for illegal alien youth gender transition procedures wouldn't also try and push the same sort of legislation to remove kids from "non-gender affirming parents" that we've seen in progressive states?
The rest flowed from this.
Posted on 10/19/24 at 9:49 am to burger bearcat
quote:
Anyone who supports or supported gay marriage should also support this. It's all along the
Negative.
Gay marriage allows people to live life as they choose
Taking kids from parents punishes the parents from living life as they choose.
Page 6 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News