- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Keith Olbermann suspended from Twitter
Posted on 12/15/22 at 10:13 pm to boosiebadazz
Posted on 12/15/22 at 10:13 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:You're reaching and you look like an idiot with this take.
But I can also laugh at how thin-skinned he is showing himself to be while doing it
Posted on 12/15/22 at 10:13 pm to cwill
Elon's company pays for out of state abortions.
Posted on 12/15/22 at 10:14 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
What's the difference in posting Elon's jet location, considering it is also public information?
It's weird. I answered this question in the text you quoted, but you still asked anyway. Here's the answer for you:
quote:
Libs of TikTok retweets what other people tweet or otherwise post themselves on social media.
This post was edited on 12/15/22 at 10:15 pm
Posted on 12/15/22 at 10:15 pm to DMAN1968
quote:
Fire! in a crowded theater is ok?
Not to defend crazy but, if there is actually a fire, then yes.
Posted on 12/15/22 at 10:15 pm to imjustafatkid
There is no 1st amendment violation in posting publicly available information. Free speech absolutism ftw!!!
Posted on 12/15/22 at 10:16 pm to DMAN1968
quote:
Soooo.... Fire! in a crowded theater is ok?
Actually, it’s perfectly fine to warn others of a fire in the theater.
Posted on 12/15/22 at 10:16 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
To the point of endangerment?
In reference to accounts being banned according to flimsy TOS rules, which was the case with conservatives before Musk took over Twitter. Let's not orphan my comment of the context, which was in reference to the former situation.
Posted on 12/15/22 at 10:17 pm to DMAN1968
quote:
Fire! in a crowded theater is ok?
Not a 1A problem.
Posted on 12/15/22 at 10:18 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:That would be endangerment.
In reference to accounts being banned according to flimsy TOS rules
Posted on 12/15/22 at 10:18 pm to cwill
Good grief can you contain this meltdown
How many threads are you going to cry in
How many threads are you going to cry in
Posted on 12/15/22 at 10:18 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
It's weird. I answered this question in the text you quoted, but you still asked anyway. Here's the answer for you:
But that is exactly what ElonJet did, using publicly available information to reveal the locations of Musk, and other billionaires. The distinction you want to make is that the latter situation endangered Musk directly.
Posted on 12/15/22 at 10:19 pm to cwill
quote:
There is no 1st amendment violation in posting publicly available information. Free speech absolutism ftw!!!
He isn't banning the spread of publicly available information. He's banning the spread of immediate, real-time tracking of a person's location.
Posted on 12/15/22 at 10:20 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
That would be endangerment.
Milo, getting banned for mocking that comedian on SNL, was endangerment? I'm not following you here.
Posted on 12/15/22 at 10:20 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
But that is exactly what ElonJet did
Nope. You should read it again.
quote:
Libs of TikTok retweets what other people tweet or otherwise post themselves on social media.
He isn't banning people for sharing where he himself posts he is or is going.
This post was edited on 12/15/22 at 10:22 pm
Posted on 12/15/22 at 10:23 pm to cwill
quote:quote:Not a 1A problem.
Fire! in a crowded theater is ok?
Odd phraseology.
Fire! in a crowded theater is not protected language under the 1stA. Is that a problem? It sure is if you're the one shouting "Fire!"
Posted on 12/15/22 at 10:23 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
No, I’m pretty consistent that Musk can ban who he wants. But I can also laugh at how thin-skinned he is showing himself to be while doing it
Not sure you understand the meaning of “thin skinned”. You start messing with safety of peoples kids and you’ve pretty much unlocked all the levels of recourse.
Posted on 12/15/22 at 10:24 pm to Lsuhoohoo
Let me guess....Elon Musk is now THE WORST PERSON IN THE WOOOOOORLD!!
Posted on 12/15/22 at 10:24 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
He isn't banning people for sharing where he himself posts he is or is going.
He's just banning references to ElonJet, even in links to other websites, as well as banning another platform's account, Mastodon, which mentioned that users could follow ElonJet on Mastodon. He's creating a Streisand Effect for himself, which is hilarious.
This post was edited on 12/15/22 at 10:25 pm
Posted on 12/15/22 at 10:26 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
Not sure you understand the meaning of “thin skinned”. You start messing with safety of peoples kids and you’ve pretty much unlocked all the levels of recourse.
Smashing in Tucker's front door or taking an Uber to the neighborhood of a sitting USSC Justice with full intent to cause harm = being thin skinned to the violent Marxist Left.
Posted on 12/15/22 at 10:26 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
The free speech high mindedness lasted what, a month?
One of the problems with being a pure contrarian is that sometimes you say stupid shite just to be on the other side of an issue. This is one of those times.
Popular
Back to top



0








