Started By
Message

Justice Roberts is an Embarrassment

Posted on 5/8/22 at 5:40 pm
Posted by Lsudx256
DFW
Member since Mar 2016
2911 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 5:40 pm
Reports are that he is trying to persuade another justice to back off their decision to overturn. Is it Epstein Island that has changed him? How can you even consider him conservative if he isn’t all about taking away the federal mandate on this? Isn’t it considered conservative to stop federal government from making laws like this?
I’m seriously confused on what is going on, if this is true.
Posted by 14&Counting
Eugene, OR
Member since Jul 2012
37651 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 5:41 pm to
The Court would lose more credibility if they walk that decision back

Posted by td01241
Savannah
Member since Nov 2012
22849 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 5:43 pm to
The court would literally be useless if they walk this back. Roberts is a pussy but he does care about one thing, and that’s the image and prestige of the court. I don’t believe this.
This post was edited on 5/8/22 at 5:44 pm
Posted by jimmarley
Southeast
Member since May 2020
1524 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 5:44 pm to
Isn't he the one that cast the deciding vote on Obama Care?
Posted by Epaminondas
The Boot
Member since Jul 2020
4183 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 5:44 pm to
John Roberts is compromised.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
71171 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 5:45 pm to
Doesn't make sense. He could simply join the majority, assign himself the opinion, and narrowly rewrite it to allow the 15 week cutoff.

Kicks the can down the road but he can worry about other cases later.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95754 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 5:46 pm to
If this is the case, then Roberts needs to go.

A Chief Justice who has no backbone has no place holding that position. I would just wait until 2025 to toss him.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164196 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 5:47 pm to
I don't know much about the inner workings of judicial panels and all that crap but are other judges allowed to try to influence other judges or are decisions supposed to be reached individually?
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67977 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 5:48 pm to

He must be afraid that this decision might tear the Republic apart.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95754 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 5:49 pm to
He thought the same thing about ObamaCare. All it did was make things worse when he flip flopped.
Posted by bluedragon
Birmingham
Member since May 2020
6534 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 5:50 pm to
Reports from who?

Half assed gossip.

Or are you a janitor inside SCOTUS?
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
20539 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 5:52 pm to
quote:

Reports are that he is trying to persuade another justice to back off their decision to overturn.


bullshite.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67977 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 5:54 pm to
quote:

Reports from who?

Half assed gossip.

Or are you a janitor inside SCOTUS?


no, just my own wild speculation
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65121 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 5:54 pm to
quote:

The Court would lose more credibility if they walk that decision back


This.

It basically signals that the Court is not immune to public pressure, thus completely undermining its purpose.
Posted by Quidam65
Q Continuum
Member since Jun 2010
19309 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 5:56 pm to
quote:

He could simply join the majority, assign himself the opinion, and narrowly rewrite it to allow the 15 week cutoff.


But if Justices Alito, Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, Thomas and Barrett don't agree to limit their holding to just the 15-week cutoff, how can he write the majority opinion? Wouldn't they have to agree as well?
Posted by NPComb
Member since Jan 2019
27375 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 5:56 pm to
quote:

Lsudx256


Sausage link por favor?
Posted by 14&Counting
Eugene, OR
Member since Jul 2012
37651 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

But if Justices Alito, Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, Thomas and Barrett don't agree to limit their holding to just the 15-week cutoff, how can he write the majority opinion? Wouldn't they have to agree as well?


They are not deciding that....they deciding if Mississippi can decide that
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95754 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 6:00 pm to
He could write a concurring opinion if he can’t get the votes. I don’t see him getting them either if Alito is writing the opinion and CT is likely to vote with Alito. He would need Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and ACB to vote with him to assure a majority opinion.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
71171 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 6:01 pm to
They could write a concurrence.

But at a minimum Roberts could limit the reach on this case.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
53431 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 6:02 pm to
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram