- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jury rules against dad trying to save his 7-year-old from gender ‘transition’
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:09 pm to RebelExpress38
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:09 pm to RebelExpress38
He should go postal on his lawyer - HTF are there 11 people on a jury of 12 who side with the wife?
0
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:11 pm to RebelExpress38
This is in Texas? How the frick is this legal to do to a 7 year old?
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:12 pm to RebelExpress38
The kid is 7
The mom needs a bullet between her eyes
Plus she's a Dr.
Unreal
The mom needs a bullet between her eyes
Plus she's a Dr.
Unreal
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:12 pm to RebelExpress38
Damn all those people to hell except dad. How can a 7 yr old even begin to understand what all of this truly means
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:12 pm to RebelExpress38
If Dad was doing this over Mom’s wishes, would the results be the same?
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:13 pm to RebelExpress38
I can’t believe this is where we are as a society. This is child abuse and 11 people dont see it.
This post was edited on 10/21/19 at 7:13 pm
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:14 pm to RebelExpress38
Time to seek asylum in Singapore.
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:18 pm to The Boat
quote:
Plus she's a Dr.
Let’s be real, she probably has a PhD in gender studies
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:18 pm to RebelExpress38
If either parent sexually touched a 7 year old child, they’d be in jail. But this is ok. This is the end result of SJW philosophy. I want the progs in here to try and defend this.
This post was edited on 10/21/19 at 7:30 pm
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:19 pm to RollTide4Ever
How on God's green earth is this even remotely possible? How? Surely this isn't the end. It has to go higher, eventually to the Supreme Court, where hopefully some normal judges will rule on it. I mean, that's what has to happen, right?
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:19 pm to RebelExpress38
"How a jury pushed a father to kill his ex-wife."
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:20 pm to RebelExpress38
So difficult to understand, but as I read it, the Jury isn’t saying they are ok with her doing this, that her doing this is a ramification of the conservatorship decision.
Apple and oranges... and no, I don’t think she should do it. F that bitch for putting the kid through that. Just clarifying what the jury was likely ruling on.
Wonder what the dad did to lose joint conservatorship
and it go to this level.
Any more insight leading up to this?
But yes, frick this stupid world.
Apple and oranges... and no, I don’t think she should do it. F that bitch for putting the kid through that. Just clarifying what the jury was likely ruling on.
Wonder what the dad did to lose joint conservatorship
and it go to this level. Any more insight leading up to this?
But yes, frick this stupid world.
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:21 pm to SCLibertarian
Is it normal for custodial issues to go before a jury? What are the chances this will be taken up by a higher court??
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:22 pm to RebelExpress38
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:23 pm to RebelExpress38
There are very few things I’d go to prison for the rest of my life for. This qualifies.
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:23 pm to shinerfan
quote:
Is it normal for custodial issues to go before a jury?
Pretty sure that’s a no, which is why I want more background leading up to this.
Sounds like he did something to lose his joint conservatorship and is fighting it with “if I lose it, she will do this”
She’s 100% wrong, but something is missing here. And again, F that bitch
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:24 pm to RebelExpress38
I hope the mom gets hit by a car.
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:25 pm to Lsut81
I definitely understand that angle, but how is doing this not considered child abuse? If I’m on that jury I’m worried I’m about to vote to give sole custody to someone I know full well will abuse the child.
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:26 pm to RebelExpress38
so if his wife suddenly got run over and the truck backed over her body about 23 times by "accident", would he then regain the rights to raise his son as the normal human being he was born to be before his insane sadistic mentally retarded wife decided to use him as a virtue signalling experimental prop? or would the court insist some freaks got custody and still mutilate the boy?
and if they prosecuted him i volunteer to be on the jury to say not guilty even if they had video of him doing it. never would there be a better case for justified homicide to protect your child
and if they prosecuted him i volunteer to be on the jury to say not guilty even if they had video of him doing it. never would there be a better case for justified homicide to protect your child
This post was edited on 10/21/19 at 7:29 pm
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:26 pm to Lsut81
quote:
Sounds like he did something to lose his joint conservatorship
Yeah, used the pronoun that his ex wife didn't want him to use when referring to his son.
Page 2 of 45
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News