- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge Tigar defies federal appeals court, reinstates injunction against asylum ban
Posted on 9/9/19 at 6:10 pm to thetempleowl
Posted on 9/9/19 at 6:10 pm to thetempleowl
quote:No.
He just reinstated his bullshite injunction Nationwide after a higher court narrowed his original injunction
CWill provided a good, succinct summary of what really happened.
1
Posted on 9/9/19 at 6:10 pm to Tchefuncte Tiger
quote:
Judge Tigar defies federal appeals court, reinstates injunction against asylum ban
quote:
Can't he be impeached and removed for this?
Theoretically he could be, but impeachment is 100% political and with a Dem House, good luck!
Posted on 9/9/19 at 6:14 pm to AggieHank86
LiberalHank and Cwillegal never met an illegal they didn’t like
Posted on 9/9/19 at 6:14 pm to Strannix
Arrest for contempt of appeals court. Do it now.
Posted on 9/9/19 at 6:18 pm to Strannix
Or I actually read the facts of the matter and laid them out? Nothing done was a rejection of an upper court ruling, nothing is impeachable. The feds can appeal all the way to the SCt and have the injunction removed. That’s how it works.
Posted on 9/9/19 at 6:25 pm to cwill
So what “new evidence” was presented? The appeals court already made the decision, why wasn’t this evidence part of the original suit?
Posted on 9/9/19 at 6:25 pm to cwill
Despite my desires (and the claims he is a dictator) Trump will not ignore the ruling and will work through the courts.
However, what he should do while the case is pending is have CBP stick every asylum seeker in Judge Tigar's living room and ICE should surround his house and immediately deport anyone who tries to leave.
However, what he should do while the case is pending is have CBP stick every asylum seeker in Judge Tigar's living room and ICE should surround his house and immediately deport anyone who tries to leave.
This post was edited on 9/9/19 at 6:31 pm
Posted on 9/9/19 at 6:28 pm to udtiger
quote:
Cwillegal
I’m trademarking that by the way
Posted on 9/9/19 at 6:39 pm to Strannix
quote:And Strannix never saw a legal opinion that he actually understood ... not that it keeps him from offering his interpretations of them.
LiberalHank and Cwillegal never met an illegal they didn’t like
Posted on 9/9/19 at 6:41 pm to Strannix
quote:The new evidence is laid out in detail in the 14 page District Court opinion. You would be aware of this, if you had bothered to read the opinion.
So what “new evidence” was presented? The appeals court already made the decision, why wasn’t this evidence part of the original suit?
The District Court was able to hear and admit additional evidence, because this was not the result of a final trial. It was a result of a preliminary injunction hearing. Additional evidence is always admissible at that level.
Posted on 9/9/19 at 6:42 pm to AggieHank86
I ask you again sir , what “new evidence” compelling enough for Tigar to challenge a federal appeals court ruling was presented? Not that it matters, the illegal pimp lawyers could bring a used rubber into his courtroom and he would rule the same way.
Posted on 9/9/19 at 6:44 pm to Strannix
quote:
I ask you again sir , what “new evidence” compelling enough for Tigar to challenge a federal appeals court ruling was presented? Not that it matters, the illegal pimp lawyers could bring a used rubber into his courtroom and he would rule the same way.
Again, read the opinion.. It is not overy-complex.
Tigar did not “challenge“ anything. The appeals court said that there was no evidence of a nationwide effect, so the District Court judge heard additional evidence of that effect and ruled pursuant to that evidence. This is 1-L stuff.
This post was edited on 9/9/19 at 6:45 pm
Posted on 9/9/19 at 6:46 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
It’s quite simple really. Totally ignore the judge’s ruling
Exactly
Anything else is stupid
Posted on 9/9/19 at 6:47 pm to Strannix
quote:
Not that it matters, the illegal pimp lawyers could bring a used rubber into his courtroom and he would rule the same way.
Most of the judiciary, just like the press, used to try to hide the fact that their personal politics were driving their professional lives. And just like the press, a lot of them have just given up even the pretext of impartiality. TDS, I suppose.
Posted on 9/9/19 at 6:47 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
The new evidence is laid out in detail in the 14 page District Court opinion. You would be aware of this, if you had bothered to read the opinion
Hogwash. This silliness could be done for every case ever to exist.
frick him
Ignore it
Posted on 9/9/19 at 6:48 pm to AggieHank86
Wow so the entire ruling is based upon it would create hardship for the groups that support criminal aliens “the6 would have to retrain staff” and “modify a legal workshop”
This is the most ridiculous tripe I’ve ever read in my life, lawyers like this should be tarred and feathered
This is the most ridiculous tripe I’ve ever read in my life, lawyers like this should be tarred and feathered
This post was edited on 9/9/19 at 6:51 pm
Posted on 9/9/19 at 6:49 pm to AggieHank86
I read it.
There's no discussion of any additional evidence.
There is only discussion of the original complaintants tweaking their own descriptions of their scope of operations.
In other words...a used rubber.
There's no discussion of any additional evidence.
There is only discussion of the original complaintants tweaking their own descriptions of their scope of operations.
In other words...a used rubber.
This post was edited on 9/9/19 at 6:51 pm
Posted on 9/9/19 at 6:49 pm to Strannix
It's total nonsense
Basically. You can call evidence the that the people who wanted a different ruling or inconvenienced to New evidence
What fricking nonsense
Basically. You can call evidence the that the people who wanted a different ruling or inconvenienced to New evidence
What fricking nonsense
Posted on 9/9/19 at 6:50 pm to Strannix
as usual, you have completely failed to understand anything that is posted by people that you’ve already decided you don’t like. Neither CWill nor I has said that we agree with this ruling. All we have done is correct erroneous interpretations of what it does and why.
Posted on 9/9/19 at 6:50 pm to udtiger
quote:
There is only discussion of the original complaitants tweaking their own descriptions of their scope of operations
Using this approach.
EVERY ruling ever could be overturned
Page 2 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News