- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge Thurston gets Loomered within 24 hours. UPDATE: husband deleting posts
Posted on 5/2/25 at 9:20 am to EZE Tiger Fan
Posted on 5/2/25 at 9:20 am to EZE Tiger Fan
Tell me if I am wrong, me being a layman, but I read somewhere that there is language in the United States Code that would REQUIRE this judge to recuse herself in a case like this where there is a clear conflict of interest.
Myself I believe it is time to draw a line in the sand and arrest this judge for a violation of the law, and force the Supreme Court's hand on these cases. We have had these judges rule repeatedly protecting their own self interests, whether it be personal or political and damn the law, and it has to stop.
Myself I believe it is time to draw a line in the sand and arrest this judge for a violation of the law, and force the Supreme Court's hand on these cases. We have had these judges rule repeatedly protecting their own self interests, whether it be personal or political and damn the law, and it has to stop.
This post was edited on 5/2/25 at 9:22 am
1
Posted on 5/2/25 at 9:30 am to Penrod
They do. Immigration was THE issue that swung the middle. Which makes this a doubly-stupid move by Dems.
They aren’t thinking anymore. They are just reacting to everything Trump does.
They aren’t thinking anymore. They are just reacting to everything Trump does.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 10:07 am to antibarner
quote:
Myself I believe it is time to draw a line in the sand and arrest this judge for a violation of the law, and force the Supreme Court's hand on these cases. We have had these judges rule repeatedly protecting their own self interests, whether it be personal or political and damn the law, and it has to stop.
The problem is we don't have people in place who want to do the right thing.
Just how hard is our AG and her office fighting to save Trump’s plan? We obviously have to give them some benefit of the doubt. But you would like to see some progress, somewhere.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 10:18 am to Rekrul
quote:
Since he’s knowingly renting to illegals based on his own words, arrest his arse on federal charges for aiding and abetting.
Patel and Bongino need to make an example of shits like this.
This judge wants to FA, they should expect some pain.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 10:20 am to TrueTiger
I wonder if the judge knows her husband is 100% a fig.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 10:23 am to CR4090
quote:
Just how hard is our AG and her office fighting to save Trump’s plan? We obviously have to give them some benefit of the doubt. But you would like to see some progress, somewhere.
Action does speak louder than words. I guarantee you the Democrats will not hesitate.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 10:42 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Perfect example of the amplified emotional responses I was just referencing
Bro, it's not us, it's you.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 10:57 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Do you think not being emotional about 40MM illegal foreign nationals being in our country, eroding our culture, affecting housing, committing violent crimes, diluting the labor economy, voting, etc. somehow makes you better than people who care deeply about these issues?
Considering the ridiculousness emotional bullshite of what you just said....
Posted on 5/2/25 at 10:58 am to DawgCountry
quote:
as usual no comment on what the judge actually did s
What's your problem with requiring reasonable suspicion of LEO for them to stop people in America?
Posted on 5/2/25 at 10:59 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
Sane and rational people
quote:
You sound like a Democrat.
No the standard libertarian I have been since 2005
You know libertarians don't like government intrusion into our lives, an extreme example of which is authoritarianism.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 11:00 am to EZE Tiger Fan
quote:
Is the occupation of the Judge's husband a conflict of interest based on the ruling?
Why would it be a conflict of interest? Where is the direct connection between his business and the litigants/parties?
Posted on 5/2/25 at 11:15 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Why would it be a conflict of interest? Where is the direct connection between his business and the litigants/parties?
Being that her husbands business is heavily effected by this ruling.....just sayin...
Posted on 5/2/25 at 11:21 am to Warboo
quote:
Being that her husbands business is heavily effected by this ruling.....just sayin...
That is a tenuous association and also is not the standard.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 11:24 am to TrueTiger
too much effort is going into this judge's ruling. There is an obvious way around it in the ruling.
The judge said you don't need a warrant if there is fear of them fleeing. Of course there is always a fear of them fleeing.
The judge said you don't need a warrant if there is fear of them fleeing. Of course there is always a fear of them fleeing.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 11:26 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Do you think not being emotional about 40MM illegal foreign nationals being in our country, eroding our culture, affecting housing, committing violent crimes, diluting the labor economy, voting, etc. somehow makes you better than people who care deeply about these issues? Thats so on brand
He is very sensitive because he is emotionally driven. So he brings it up a lot. Additionally, he confuses being emotional with being driven by emotion. That’s probably some sort of autistic flaw he has.
He is tiptoeing around this subject arguing all of these fringe things because he’s unable to address the topic directly.
This post was edited on 5/2/25 at 11:35 am
Posted on 5/2/25 at 11:27 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That is a tenuous association and also is not the standard.
TY. What is the standard, or an example of one?
Posted on 5/2/25 at 11:29 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That is a tenuous association and also is not the standard.
Yes, it is just a fricking coincidence that he has been getting filthy rich off what she has been ruling on.
I did make a mistake earlier though.
The primary goal of our legal system as it is constructed is not only to make lawyers rich but also their families and associates, too.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 11:31 am to moneyg
quote:
He is very sensitive because he is emotionally driven.
You say this in response to a post justifying being emotional and criticizing my non-emotional analysis
Posted on 5/2/25 at 11:35 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You know libertarians don't like government intrusion into our lives, an extreme example of which is authoritarianism.
You didn't seem to mind the Biden administration's intrusion into the lives of private citizens. Harassing people at the Catholic church, harassing people at school board meetings, sentencing someone to prison over a meme, throwing the book at people for simple trespassing on Jan. 06, throwing the book at pro-life advocates. You were silent on those. Not a peep.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 11:38 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:being suspicious isnt a crime
reasonable suspicion
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News