- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge Issues TRO that Texas Democrats Cannot be Arrested
Posted on 8/9/21 at 3:59 pm to Cuz413
Posted on 8/9/21 at 3:59 pm to Cuz413
quote:
Can the judge be arrested as well for trying to interfere with the law?
Not while he is performing his official duties.
This post was edited on 8/9/21 at 4:15 pm
1
Posted on 8/9/21 at 4:06 pm to WeeWee
quote:
A judge cannot bring a charge that is true. However, Jose Garza (D) who is the Travis County district attorney can.
What charge? Ignoring a judge is NOT against Travis County LAW. The judge would have to declare the dude in contempt and then somehow get someone (a bailiff lol?) to go get him.
Again, the DA has zero law to support any charge related to this order. Name the statute that would be in play here. Especially given the fact that the Texas constitution grants the House the right to do this.
It is silliness to suggest the DA has some standing to bring a charge here. He does not
Posted on 8/9/21 at 4:07 pm to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:
What charge? Ignoring a judge is NOT against Travis County LAW. The judge would have to declare the dude in contempt and then somehow get someone (a bailiff lol?) to go get him.
Violating a temporary restraining order is a crime.
Posted on 8/9/21 at 4:09 pm to WeeWee
quote:
Not while he is perfect his official duties.
Issuing a restraining order in an attempt to stop a constitutionally mandated power should be grounds for Malfeasance.
Posted on 8/9/21 at 4:10 pm to WeeWee
quote:
Violating a temporary restraining order is a crime.
You got me. But, given the situation, I'd still do this and I suspect they will. They will likely get the TRO overturned soon anyway as the law is clearly on the side of the house being empowered to do this.
If not, there would have been no reason for the fricks to flee the state and stay away...they could just go home. But, the KNOW and ACKNOWLEGE the right be fleeing and staying away
Posted on 8/9/21 at 4:17 pm to blueridgeTiger
quote:He does not have that authority. If I know that out-of-hand as a nonlawyer, then every individual with a legal background in Texas knows the same. Let's see how long it takes this partisan POS to get put in his place.
Judge Issues TRO that Texas Democrats Cannot be Arrested
Posted on 8/9/21 at 4:17 pm to LuckyTiger
quote:Sign the petition to place TEXIT on the ballot and do away with so called Federal judges frickin’ with the Nation of Texas !!!
Ignore this judge
Posted on 8/9/21 at 4:25 pm to blueridgeTiger
Go figure dude looks like he climbed over the wall to get here.
Posted on 8/9/21 at 4:30 pm to Strannix
quote:
he doesn't have the authority
I'm not saying I agree or disagree, but why wouldn't he have the authority to issue a TRO?
Posted on 8/9/21 at 4:35 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
He does not have that authority.
Care to explain the thinking here? I don't follow why so many are convinced that a TX state court judge cannot issue a TRO, unless there is something express in Texas law that would prevent that from happening in this instance.
Also, TRO's are very often issued and then once there is a hearing on the preliminary/permanent injunction, the judge will lift the TRO and deny the injunction.
Posted on 8/9/21 at 4:38 pm to blueridgeTiger
Democrats shite on court orders all the time. As governor of Texas, I'd dare him to do something about it.
Posted on 8/9/21 at 4:39 pm to blueridgeTiger
Yeah, that's notnhow this works.
Posted on 8/9/21 at 5:06 pm to Crimson1st
quote:
Who is going to stop him?
I look for the Texas Supreme Court to exercise its supervisory authority in this case. It didn't hesitate when the beauty shop owner was jailed by a local judge.
Posted on 8/9/21 at 6:21 pm to blueridgeTiger
Gotta give to the Dems. They’re tough. They dont give a crap about the rule of law. They just win.
Oh the constitution and the people don’t want gay marriage to be legal? Screw it, make judges make it legal.
Oh Obama Care is unconstitutional? Screw it, call it a tax.
GOP are low T sissies. Always lose.
I’ve never seen a President more opposed by his own party than Trump.
Oh the constitution and the people don’t want gay marriage to be legal? Screw it, make judges make it legal.
Oh Obama Care is unconstitutional? Screw it, call it a tax.
GOP are low T sissies. Always lose.
I’ve never seen a President more opposed by his own party than Trump.
Posted on 8/9/21 at 6:36 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
quote:
he doesn't have the authority
I'm not saying I agree or disagree, but why wouldn't he have the authority to issue a TRO?
He probably can, he could also issue a tro saying that murder can be committed and no one charged. The point is, a tro to prevent the state from enforcing the laws of the constitution of the state of Texas is nonsense and cant be enforced.
Posted on 8/9/21 at 6:37 pm to blueridgeTiger
Abbott should go the way of Jackson.
The court has made its ruling… now let’s see them enforce it.
The court has made its ruling… now let’s see them enforce it.
Posted on 8/9/21 at 6:48 pm to blueridgeTiger
Is there an active Judge ANYWHERE that rules right?
This post was edited on 8/9/21 at 6:50 pm
Posted on 8/9/21 at 6:59 pm to blueridgeTiger
Why is it these judges are not required to show their work? for example - I'm issuing a TRO because this X statute says Y is not subject to the law or whatever...
A leftist judge granting the dems the title of 'political enemies' affords them special privileges where intentionally being derelict in your sworn duties is no longer a problem and the laws no longer apply to you.
total horseshite.. ignore this clown and round them up... push comes to shove use the dem/CDC playbook and declare it an oopsie after the desired outcome is achieved.
A leftist judge granting the dems the title of 'political enemies' affords them special privileges where intentionally being derelict in your sworn duties is no longer a problem and the laws no longer apply to you.
total horseshite.. ignore this clown and round them up... push comes to shove use the dem/CDC playbook and declare it an oopsie after the desired outcome is achieved.
Posted on 8/9/21 at 7:09 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Also, TRO's are very often issued and then once there is a hearing on the preliminary/permanent injunction, the judge will lift the TRO and deny the injunction
There has to be SOME legal basis for the request for relief. There is none here.
Posted on 8/9/21 at 7:21 pm to udtiger
As I see it... at least from Florida, is this TRO issue raises serious constitutional questions. First, who would be the “arresting officers”? Sgt at arms? Are they under the control of the legislature? Does the constitution give them the authority to arrest?
If so, the court does not have the power to interfere with the power of the legislative branch. Separation of powers. I would think that they could ignore it.
I would love to see the pleadings and here the argument made at the hearing
If so, the court does not have the power to interfere with the power of the legislative branch. Separation of powers. I would think that they could ignore it.
I would love to see the pleadings and here the argument made at the hearing
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News