- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge Boasberg 4pm hearing demanding answers from Trump Adm: ACLU filing of VZ gang
Posted on 3/17/25 at 3:34 pm to cajunangelle
Posted on 3/17/25 at 3:34 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
You are actually pulling for this judge to wrongfully get horrid criminals back into America?
Why do y'all keep reaching?
He's just commenting on the potentially illegal behavior by the Trump DOJ and then their response to the judge ordering a hearing, not on the underlying merits.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 3:35 pm to Decatur
quote:
Man they’re starting to look real desperate to get out of this
Judge was desperate to make a oral ruling while flights were in air. Trump said honk on my rod. Now the judge is just show boating while knowing there is nothing that he can do about it. The desperation is with the court/judge.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 3:35 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
You are actually pulling for this judge to wrongfully get horrid criminals back into America?
Correct. Posters like the one you are replying to would replace you with one of these animals in a nanosecond. That's how little he thinks of you and your family.
They want the votes and the chaos that these foot soldiers bring. Progressives are evil. The sooner you accept this, the quicker you will understand why they are this warped.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 3:35 pm to Decatur
The judge has no authority over the CIC.
NATIONAL SECURITY trumps TDS.
TRY AGAIN.
NATIONAL SECURITY trumps TDS.
TRY AGAIN.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 3:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
not on the underlying merits.
do you believe really believe this? if so,
yikes
Posted on 3/17/25 at 3:39 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
Judge Boasberg
Bring the cocksucker to Congress and have him testify to the reason why he ordered the way he did in this matter!
Posted on 3/17/25 at 3:40 pm to DawgCountry
No, he doesn't.
He's trolling again.
He's trolling again.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 3:40 pm to SlowFlowPro
DENIED.
TROLLING THIS IS SICK.
NOT FUNNY TRY AGAIN.
TROLLING THIS IS SICK.
NOT FUNNY TRY AGAIN.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 3:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Still bringing the lead-pipe-cinch fire…
potentially illegal
Posted on 3/17/25 at 3:44 pm to cajunangelle
How wild is it democrats are actively trying to keep violent gang members in this country 
Posted on 3/17/25 at 3:44 pm to DawgCountry
He still believes in Jack Smith and meanie peany Judge Aileen showing his arse to the Hague door.
Oh, and there was/is no lawfare against Trump because it is one sided.
SFP-Esquire
Oh, and there was/is no lawfare against Trump because it is one sided.
SFP-Esquire
Posted on 3/17/25 at 3:45 pm to cajunangelle
Biden can fly them in, but Trump can't fly them out.
Got it, Judge Cocksucker.
Got it, Judge Cocksucker.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 3:47 pm to cajunangelle
Looks to me like the ACLU needs to be declared a terrorist organization for supporting and defending TDA terrorists.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 3:47 pm to cajunangelle
This is bizzoro world with these libtards.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 3:48 pm to Pelican fan99
This represents all of our concerned moderates like AggieHank when confronted with legal issues that conservatives take.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 3:48 pm to EZE Tiger Fan
I said this the other day as well...
The establishment democrats and sneaky hidey Republicans, want the chaos and destruction.
It is marxisn in full ugly bloom .
The establishment democrats and sneaky hidey Republicans, want the chaos and destruction.
It is marxisn in full ugly bloom .
Posted on 3/17/25 at 3:52 pm to BurlesonCountyAg
quote:
This represents all of our concerned moderates like AggieHank when confronted with legal issues that conservatives take.
This is largely due to a contingent on here who can't separate legal (especially procedural or jurisdictional) arguments from arguments on the underlying merits, and their increase in anger as the merits are ignored as part of the discussion (Despite their best attempts to focus only on the merits and ignore the legal aspects).
This post was edited on 3/17/25 at 3:53 pm
Posted on 3/17/25 at 3:53 pm to cajunangelle
Who had standing to bring this before a judge?
Popular
Back to top



5





