re: Judge Beryl Howell goes all in blocks another Trump EO - Perkins Coie

quote:

---

You sound like a leftist after a school shooting now.

---

quote:

---

The idea that if they could have gotten to a point where they could have removed Trump, they just wouldn't, is one of the more fricking retarded things I've ever seen presented here.

And that's saying something.

---

Again, you have to go back to the original post.

quote:

---

First, their viewpoints are irrelevant and not pertinent. Perkins Coke is a domestic security risk for the United States and the Constitution because its actions were a coordinated attack to overthrow the elected government of the United States through false, subversive, and overt acts.

---

Perkins Coie is not the DOJ

quote:

---

In a political campaign

---

Stop playing dumb.

RussiaGate wasn't a political campaign.

quote:

---

But the point is that Perkins Coie is not the DOJ, and their actions seem exclusively related to the campaign.

---

No sir. You are lying. The second operation of opposition research was indirectly funded by the Democratic National Committee and the Clinton campaign, working through their attorney of record, Marc Elias of Perkins Coie. The Dossier was not completed until Dec of 2016.

quote:

---

No sir. You are lying.

---

You can say it, but we're still waiting on your evidence to support those words.

quote:

---

Stop playing dumb.

---

He's not playing.

quote:

---

They supplied the DOJ with the knowingly false report

---

You're engaging in a little expansion of reality.

The DOJ intentionally used a dossier they knew to be untruthful. Those actions are exclusively of the DOJ. They engaged in other mistruths, fraud, and deceit unrelated to the specific dossier. Again, nobody is saying the DOJ didn't act improperly. Take their security clearance.

quote:

---

Again, you have to go back to the original post.

---

This one? In response to a question about the goal of Russia-gate, this was your response:

quote:

---

Clearly the goals were to be negative towards Trump, but there is a huge chasm between that and "overthrowing" Trump.

---

You appear to be making the claim that the bad actors that executed Russia-gate didn't actually want him out of office, they just want to be "negative".

Feel free to clarify.

The real issue here is that Perkins Coie is an arm of the Democrat Party. Everybody knows it. That is an obvious fact. If they say they do not they are lying. Of course, facts do not necessarily matter in the legal profession but our conversation is all hypothetical.

The "legal" issue is that continued access to classified info gives Perkins Coie a competitive advantage, which means more money. They also have a wide array of judges in their pocket, also obviously. That loosens them up to do more for their primary master, the Democrat Party.

I wonder why other legal firms cannot sue them for their unearned competitive advantage gifted to them because of who they work for. There is probably an "ethical" legal tenet against doing that.

quote:

---

quote:

I supply the weapon used in a murder I have no culpability.



You sound like a leftist after a school shooting now.

---

How stupid are you going to be today? That's nowhere near the same.

"I gave the weapon knowing it would be used for murder".

PC new exactly what they were doing because they were hired to do just that!