re: Judge Beryl Howell goes all in blocks another Trump EO - Perkins Coie

quote:

---

Nope, it's a realistic alternative to viewpoint differences.

---

Not in terms of the law, EO, or court ruling at issue.

Like I said, you'd need a new thread and EO to have that discussion

quote:

---

quote:
Why can't this be about unethical behavior instead of viewpoint differences?

That's an entirely different discussion and would need another thread (and, hell, EO, probably)

---

EO 14230

quote:

---

Section 1

.

Purpose.

The dishonest and dangerous activity of the law firm Perkins Coie LLP (“Perkins Coie”) has affected this country for decades. Notably, in 2016 while representing failed Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, Perkins Coie hired Fusion GPS, which then manufactured a false “dossier” designed to steal an election. This egregious activity is part of a pattern. Perkins Coie has worked with activist donors including George Soros to judicially overturn popular, necessary, and democratically enacted election laws, including those requiring voter identification. In one such case, a court was forced to sanction Perkins Coie attorneys for an unethical lack of candor before the court

---

No dude, it's this thread. You chose to discuss something different, which mirrors the activist judge position. Maybe you could stop being the arbiter of who is keeping the discussion focused, you suck at it.

quote:

---

Not in terms of the law, EO, or court ruling at issue.

Like I said, you'd need a new thread and EO to have that discussion

---

The EO said security clearances were being pulled because of viewpoint differences?

quote:

---

You just said you did address his point, now he doesn't have one. Which is it?

---

His tried and true "winning" oozing through!

quote:

---

100% chance of a "pivot" retort

---

Wrong again

quote:

---

No I'm discussing the case at the center of OP.

---

The case about the EO that mentioned unethical behavior in its language?

You're saying the claim that whether or not Perkins Coie acted unethical is not relevant to that case?

quote:

---

I did not.

---

you did

quote:

---

This did not happen.

---

still happening

quote:

---

Not necessarily. Employment and contractor have legal meanings and I'm assuming the judge was using these specific meanings.

---

And both of those meanings mean "in business" in this context.

quote:

---

If I am hired by a business to do legal work for them, I'm not a "contractor" of the business, within the legal definition.

---

You most certainly are, this is basic shite. wtf are you even doing, do I need to start posting definitions again?

quote:

---

Those questions aren't really important.

---

quote:

---

I know this may annoy you, but that's a textbook strawman.

---

I'm actually surprised you remembered something else I said in the thread, so I'm not annoyed, but you are wrong. None of the firms rights are being violated, their security clearances are being taken away. That's the discussion, and anything beyond that is indeed a strawman.

quote:

---

No dude, it's this thread. You chose to discuss something different, which mirrors the activist judge position. Maybe you could stop being the arbiter of who is keeping the discussion focused, you suck at it.

---

He does this constantly. If he has 3 or more posts in a thread that's a sign he feels he can derail the conversation.

quote:

---

I'm glad you pointed that out. The dishonesty in the prior posting of it was worse than I imagined.

---

What does this even mean? the words from the EO are posted, and you vaguely reference "prior postings"...weak

quote:

---

No I'm discussing the case at the center of OP.

---

Not a discussion, you are in full agreement with a ridiculous judge position.

quote:

---

But it was part of the focus of the EO.

---

Title of thread

quote:

---

Judge Beryl Howell goes all in blocks another Trump EO - Perkins Coie

---