- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge Awards Andy Ngo $300k
Posted on 8/22/23 at 11:30 am to LuckyTiger
Posted on 8/22/23 at 11:30 am to LuckyTiger
quote:
Do these scumbags even have any wages or assets?
fbi or dnc income
0
Posted on 8/22/23 at 12:24 pm to Ghost of Bob Horner
They have organs, don't they?
Posted on 8/22/23 at 1:42 pm to 632627
quote:
I’m confused, I thought there was a jury trial that ngo just lost?
He was trying to sue the group they "belonged to", part of antifa or something. Tough to prove they were the cause of him being beaten.
Some on the board, myself included, wondered why he was not suing the individuals, guess he was.
Posted on 8/22/23 at 1:46 pm to trinidadtiger
quote:I am curious why he did not sue all of them in one lawsuit. My guess is that the local joint/several liability laws played a role.
He was trying to sue the group they "belonged to", part of antifa or something. Tough to prove they were the cause of him being beaten.
Some on the board, myself included, wondered why he was not suing the individuals, guess he was.
Posted on 8/22/23 at 1:51 pm to Eighteen
quote:
The trial he lost was against those who doxxed him and his location that allowed these 3 to come and assault him
These are the ones who actually attacked him
Causation??? IF not for A: The doxxing then B: Assault would never have happened. Therefore the other defendants have to be guilty of A as well. Right??
Posted on 8/22/23 at 2:13 pm to Broke
thank you for explaining to the fake lawyer
Posted on 8/22/23 at 2:55 pm to TigerAxeOK
quote:It would seem their knowledge of its effects and their intent when they fling them is clear. They mean to do significant harm. Period.
They've simply just found a "loophole" that casts a gray area on what constitutes a "weapon". This tactic has been going on in Seattle and Portland for quite a few years.
Posted on 8/22/23 at 2:56 pm to blueboy
Great but he deserved even more for what they did to him.
Posted on 8/22/23 at 3:01 pm to Eighteen
quote:
those who doxxed him and his location that allowed these 3 to come and assault him
I can see how it could more of a reach from a legal liability standpoint, but frick those scum bags too.
This post was edited on 8/22/23 at 3:02 pm
Posted on 8/22/23 at 4:18 pm to AggieHank86
quote:My understanding is that one group doxxed which permitted the battery to be carried out by the second group.
IF not for A: The doxxing then B: Assault would never have happened. Therefore the other defendants have to be guilty of A as well. Right??
No
While chronologically related, they were actually separate legal issues because no connecting link was proven to join the two groups into one conspiratorial entity.
Am I confused?
Posted on 8/22/23 at 4:32 pm to Rabby
quote:Did you read the link?
My understanding is that one group doxxed which permitted the battery to be carried out by the second group.
While chronologically related, they were actually separate legal issues because no connecting link was proven to join the two groups into one conspiratorial entity.
Am I confused?
It comes down to the difference between proximate cause and cause-in-fact.
Posted on 8/22/23 at 4:35 pm to LuckyTiger
quote:
Do these scumbags even have any wages or assets?
Hopefully these were the 'spoiled rich kid' wing of ANTIFA
Posted on 8/22/23 at 5:03 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
It comes down to the difference between proximate cause and cause-in-fact.
NOw explain that concept regarding the verdict in the Werner trucking case in Texas...
This post was edited on 8/22/23 at 5:04 pm
Posted on 8/22/23 at 5:24 pm to dafif
quote:I infer that you are suggesting that the intentional torts against Ngo (by non-parties) were as foreseeable to the blogger defendants as an auto accident was to a trucking company that forced its (craptastic) driver to hit the freeways in an ice storm. Correct?quote:NOw explain that concept regarding the verdict in the Werner trucking case in Texas...
It comes down to the difference between proximate cause and cause-in-fact.
Honestly, I am not sure that I agree with the jury in that case as to EITHER the company OR the driver (no matter how poorly he had been scoring in his training). As I recall, the plaintiffs' vehicle was traveling the OTHER direction, driving too fast, spun out, hit ANOTHER vehicle, then crossed the median and hit the defendants' vehicle. I have trouble seeing much liability there, but I wasn't present at court and didn't see everything that the jury saw.
This post was edited on 8/22/23 at 5:38 pm
Posted on 8/22/23 at 6:23 pm to AggieHank86
quote:Out of curiosity Hank, what type of law do you practice?
Honestly, I am not sure that I agree with the jury in that case as to EITHER the company OR the driver (no matter how poorly he had been scoring in his training). As I recall, the plaintiffs' vehicle was traveling the OTHER direction, driving too fast, spun out, hit ANOTHER vehicle, then crossed the median and hit the defendants' vehicle. I have trouble seeing much liability there, but I wasn't present at court and didn't see everything that the jury saw.
Posted on 8/22/23 at 7:06 pm to LuckyTiger
quote:
Do these scumbags even have any wages or assets?
They are paid protestors. They’ll be flown out to the next fake uprising and cashing checks from Soros organizations.
Posted on 8/22/23 at 9:47 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
infer that you are suggesting that the intentional torts against Ngo (by non-parties) were as foreseeable to the blogger defendants as an auto accident was to a trucking company
I would argue that foreseeability (Palsgraf) is much greater for doxxing resulting in people going to the address and causing harm than a truck going down the road and having a car fly through the median from the opposite direction somehow being the trucks fault.
Posted on 8/22/23 at 9:49 pm to blueboy
I would guess these people are judgement proof.
Posted on 8/22/23 at 11:00 pm to cwill
quote:
I would guess these people are judgement proof.
The freak show carny pay scale hasn't kept up with the new Bideneconomics.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News