Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Journalist who say "probably"

Posted on 6/5/18 at 8:13 am
Posted by spudz
Member since Mar 2015
440 posts
Posted on 6/5/18 at 8:13 am
Is it spreading facts or opinions?

Waiting on the electrician to swing by the house and watching the Today Show (trash; don't do it). This reporter says the line "will probably have to sit in jail until a hearing" (referring to the Manafort news)

Either he is or he isn't, and you don't know the facts yet so why even include that line.

Michelle Obama was probably a dude and Barack Hussein probably was a Muslim. Carson Wentz probably hates his teammates for denying his MAGA moment. This thread probably sucks but it probably is what it is.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118683 posts
Posted on 6/5/18 at 8:15 am to
It's just a cue indicating that they don't know and whatever comes out of my mouth next is all speculation.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54202 posts
Posted on 6/5/18 at 8:17 am to
Whenever someone starts off a sentence with one of those "indefinite" words, he/she just admitted that for being a professional, their opinion is no more noteworthy than my opinion. As Joe Friday said - just give me the facts.
Posted by KSGamecock
The Woodlands, TX
Member since May 2012
22982 posts
Posted on 6/5/18 at 8:18 am to
It's a weasel word. "Probably" "Suspected" "Allegedly" "Some people say" "Anonymous sources close to..." Never trust anything that comes after or before those terms.
Posted by Erin Go Bragh
Beyond the Pale
Member since Dec 2007
14916 posts
Posted on 6/5/18 at 8:19 am to
Some of these so-called journalists sound like the narrator of Ancient Aliens: "is it possible?", "Could it be?" "Perhaps".

This post was edited on 6/5/18 at 8:20 am
Posted by KeyserSoze999
Member since Dec 2009
10608 posts
Posted on 6/5/18 at 8:23 am to
the worst is "Most Americans agree ..... blah blah lib diarrhea blah blah"


Juan Williams is a champion of this line, but its the lazy propagandist way of most.
Posted by ibldprplgld
Member since Feb 2008
24957 posts
Posted on 6/5/18 at 8:25 am to
It gives them a chance at being the first to release "information" and at the same time room to crawfish later when they're wrong.

What was once a proud and respected profession has now been reduced to the likes of Dear Diary meets Mean Girls.
Posted by Chimlim
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jul 2005
17712 posts
Posted on 6/5/18 at 8:25 am to
To be honest, I'd rather a journalist admit what they're about to say may not be factual, rather than immediately report something as fact that has not been verified....CNN..
This post was edited on 6/5/18 at 8:26 am
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
94870 posts
Posted on 6/5/18 at 8:26 am to
Typically means wishcasting.

It’s a weasel word intended to deflect claims of libel for saying something completely unsupported by facts.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 6/5/18 at 8:27 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/27/23 at 7:01 am
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118683 posts
Posted on 6/5/18 at 8:28 am to
quote:


It's a weasel word. "Probably" "Suspected" "Allegedly" "Some people say" "Anonymous sources close to..." Never trust anything that comes after or before those terms.


Add "appears" and "apparently" to the list.
Posted by IslandBuckeye
Boca Chica, Panama
Member since Apr 2018
10067 posts
Posted on 6/5/18 at 8:47 am to
Another example: Brennan was on some news show saying, "One could speculate" that Putin has something on Trump.

The other shows picked this up and regurgitated it as a given fact. Then progs get upset when Trump questions media and bias.
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
9897 posts
Posted on 6/5/18 at 9:03 am to
quote:

Is it spreading facts or opinions? This reporter says the line "will probably have to sit in jail until a hearing" (referring to the Manafort news)


If it's a legal reporter reporting on narrow issues like whether Paul Manafort will probably have his bail revoked for trying to suborn perjury it's probably no less objectionable than your local weatherman saying that it will probably will rain (doesn't mean that it will, but I'd take my umbrella).
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112417 posts
Posted on 6/5/18 at 9:59 am to
It's like the environmentalists using the word 'could'.

'If temperatures continue to rise the earth could burn up and all life destroyed by Tuesday of next week.'
Posted by Jax-Tiger
Port Saint Lucie, FL
Member since Jan 2005
24735 posts
Posted on 6/5/18 at 10:03 am to
quote:

Journalist who say "probably"


quote:

Is it spreading facts or opinions?


And yet, they don't have any problem stating that President Trump IS a racist...

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram