- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Jim Jordan Plans to Haul Clapper and Brennan in for Testimony
Posted on 12/1/22 at 4:30 pm
Posted on 12/1/22 at 4:30 pm
Brennan and Clapper are accomplished liars even under oath. They have little fear of perjuring themselves in front of Congress.
What's a Constitutional response when the U.S. is slowly infiltrated by subversive agents? Is the military allowed to get involved to defend against domestic bad actors? Can the bad actors be tried in military tribunals as enemy combatants?
Supreme Court precedent says yes. This is the stuff Jordan needs to start bringing up.
The Law of armed Conflict Grahm questioning KavaBaw rumble video
Townhall
What's a Constitutional response when the U.S. is slowly infiltrated by subversive agents? Is the military allowed to get involved to defend against domestic bad actors? Can the bad actors be tried in military tribunals as enemy combatants?
Supreme Court precedent says yes. This is the stuff Jordan needs to start bringing up.
The Law of armed Conflict Grahm questioning KavaBaw rumble video
Townhall
This post was edited on 12/1/22 at 4:37 pm
Posted on 12/1/22 at 4:32 pm to Chazreinhold
"Plans" is the key word
Posted on 12/1/22 at 4:32 pm to Chazreinhold
And not one damn thing will happen to either of them.
Posted on 12/1/22 at 4:38 pm to Chazreinhold
they should be hung for treason
Posted on 12/1/22 at 4:44 pm to SeeeeK
Yep, you can’t say hanging as a punishment on Social media, as it violates Community standards. I’ve been put in time out multiple times for discussing punishment for these bastards. Understand, that it was meant as after the criminal process was adjudicated, but it’s the liberals on these “watch” boards that ban you quickly. America and free speech is gone……
Posted on 12/1/22 at 4:48 pm to Chazreinhold
quote:
What's a Constitutional response when the U.S. is slowly infiltrated by subversive agents? Is the military allowed to get involved to defend against domestic bad actors? Can the bad actors be tried in military tribunals as enemy combatants?
I’ll never understand the masochism involved in you guys continuing to do this to yourselves.
Posted on 12/1/22 at 4:49 pm to Chazreinhold
World class strongly worded letters are imminent.
Posted on 12/1/22 at 5:35 pm to SeeeeK
First prove there is treason. What proof can you or anyone offer?
Posted on 12/1/22 at 5:59 pm to Chazreinhold
quote:
Jim Jordan Plans to Haul Clapper and Brennan in for Testimony
This will almost certainly be substantive in nature and definitely not just political theater in front of TV cameras.
/s
Posted on 12/1/22 at 6:07 pm to 2dog2many
quote:
First prove there is treason. What proof can you or anyone offer?
Officials in the federal government spied on, and tried to frame a duly elected president and people in his orbit while trying to frame them as agents of the Kremlin.
Treason is the crime of betraying one's country, that’s exactly what these F’ers did.
Where the hell have you been?
This post was edited on 12/1/22 at 6:07 pm
Posted on 12/1/22 at 6:15 pm to Chazreinhold
quote:
Officials in the federal government spied on, and tried to frame a duly elected president and people in his orbit while trying to frame them as agents of the Kremlin.
This alone does not equate to treason in the United States, regardless of how seditious and reprehensible said behavior may be.
quote:
Treason is the crime of betraying one's country
Maybe in the dictionary, but that’s irrelevant. Other than qualifications for federal office, Treason is just about the only thing the Constitution is specific on:
quote:
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
That bar is not met here. The Treason Clause was not intended to truly define treason for the purpose of prosecution, but moreso prevent the prosecution of political dissidents for “treason” that has been so prevalent in history. There has only been a handful of treason indictments in the last 200 years.
This post was edited on 12/1/22 at 6:20 pm
Posted on 12/1/22 at 7:40 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them
Trying to remove a duly elected President is an act of war!! Dimmys love to talk about an evolving US Constitution. Well, the definition of war is about to evolve!!
This post was edited on 12/1/22 at 7:41 pm
Posted on 12/1/22 at 7:43 pm to Chazreinhold
I'm sure theyre both terrified....
Posted on 12/1/22 at 7:49 pm to Chazreinhold
Both sides do all this shite for show.
Posted on 12/1/22 at 7:50 pm to SelaTiger
Not the dems, they raid houses and clap people in fricking leg irons. Jail terms for Bannon etc.
Are you paying attention??
Are you paying attention??
Posted on 12/1/22 at 7:55 pm to Timeoday
quote:
Trying to remove a duly elected President is an act of war!! Dimmys love to talk about an evolving US Constitution. Well, the definition of war is about to evolve!!
LARP
Posted on 12/1/22 at 7:57 pm to Chazreinhold
Nothing more than political theatre for the Rs. People STILL spout the "At this point, what difference does it make?" BS. It's ALL bullshite theatre for the masses.
Posted on 12/1/22 at 7:57 pm to Chazreinhold
....and it will be a colossal waste of time. Clapper and Brennan can claim that this was their opinions which are protected.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News