- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It's OK to be openly gay.....unless you're running as a Republican. Then, NO.
Posted on 4/28/14 at 1:42 pm to cahoots
Posted on 4/28/14 at 1:42 pm to cahoots
quote:
How about naming names Fox News?
quote:
The group’s main financial backer was railroad executive Charles McHaffie, a long-time Filner supporter, who donated $25,000 as the PAC’s sole contributor. Almost all of those involved in the committee had contributed to Filner’s mayoral or congressional campaigns in the past.
LINK
1
Posted on 4/28/14 at 1:45 pm to wilfont
quote:
Should have I included the words non conservative gay, women and black organizations? Honestly, I just figured my point was too obvious to miss. my mistake.
Your point was pointless. There are plenty of black, women, and gay groups that don't support liberalism.
Posted on 4/28/14 at 1:48 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Your point was pointless. There are plenty of black, women, and gay groups that don't support liberalism.
We just haven't heard from the majority of them because they're afraid to speak up.
Posted on 4/28/14 at 1:52 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
There are plenty of black, women, and gay groups that don't support liberalism.
What you fail to grasp are these groups who supposedly support LGBT people...arent supporting this man because he doesnt support their politics.
Wanna bet they have tax exempt status too?
Posted on 4/28/14 at 1:52 pm to cahoots
Why ask Fox news to name names when “ Deep Throat ” was allowed to remain in the dark ?
Come on now.
Come on now.
Posted on 4/28/14 at 1:53 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
We just haven't heard from the majority of them because they're afraid to speak up.
ok
Posted on 4/28/14 at 1:53 pm to wilfont
quote:
Gay organizations don't support gays. They support liberalism.
Women's organizations don't support women. They support liberalism.
Black organizations don't support blacks. They support liberalism.
correct
Posted on 4/28/14 at 1:53 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
The group’s main financial backer was railroad executive Charles McHaffie, a long-time Filner supporter, who donated $25,000 as the PAC’s sole contributor. Almost all of those involved in the committee had contributed to Filner’s mayoral or congressional campaigns in the past.
BTW found this interesting about Filner who beat DeMaio in the aforementioned race:
quote:
Filner resigned less than a year after taking office amid multiple allegations of sexual harassment.[3] He later pleaded guilty to state charges of false imprisonment and battery.
Posted on 4/28/14 at 1:54 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Your point was pointless.
Good lord man, tell me you're not this obtuse. The point being made is that liberal, non conservative, groups are more concerned with liberalism than they are with the advocacy of their kind.
I'll try to recall you require additional clarification in the future.
Posted on 4/28/14 at 1:55 pm to CptBengal
quote:
What you fail to grasp are these groups who supposedly support LGBT people...arent supporting this man because he doesnt support their politics.
Wanna bet they have tax exempt status too?
What groups? This one particular group who attacked him in the first place?
And I don't think any group should have tax exempt status in this country.
Posted on 4/28/14 at 1:55 pm to wilfont
quote:
Gay organizations don't support gays. They support liberalism.
Women's organizations don't support women. They support liberalism.
Black organizations don't support blacks. They support liberalism.
Truth
Posted on 4/28/14 at 1:56 pm to wilfont
quote:
Good lord man, tell me you're not this obtuse. The point being made is that liberal, non conservative, groups are more concerned with liberalism than they are with the advocacy of their kind.
I'll try to recall you require additional clarification in the future.
We are talking about one group here. He made a blanket statement regarding all gay, women, and black groups and that was ignorant.
And issues aren't as black and white as you make them out to be. Log Cabin Republicans, for example, are going to support a straight republican over a gay democrat more likely than not.
This post was edited on 4/28/14 at 1:58 pm
Posted on 4/28/14 at 1:58 pm to wilfont
quote:
Good lord man, tell me you're not this obtuse. The point being made is that liberal, non conservative, groups are more concerned with liberalism than they are with the advocacy of their kind.
I'll try to recall you require additional clarification in the future.
He is being obtuse on purpose because he doesn't want to accept the truth
Like the time the NAACP gave Harry Reid a pass for some off handed remark about Obama being a light skinned negro, because "Harry Reid has a track record of being a civil rights champion"
Posted on 4/28/14 at 1:59 pm to goldennugget
quote:
He is being obtuse on purpose because he doesn't want to accept the truth
There was no "truth" in the statement I rebutted. It was an overgeneralization that sounded extremely ignorant.
Posted on 4/28/14 at 2:00 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
one group here.
you should read the WHOLE article. FAIL.
quote:
issues aren't as black and white as you make them out to be
"it's complicated"
quote:
Log Cabin Republicans, for example, are going to support a straight republican over a gay democrat more likely than not.
The groups being discussed arent Liberal or Repub groups. They're GAY GROUPS.
good lord, you're an idiot.
Posted on 4/28/14 at 2:00 pm to Mickey Goldmill
I would have assumed, my fault, that the intent to identify liberal groups was understood by most here. The usage of the word liberalism was intended to be your clue. It was not intended to included conservative advocacy groups. Again, the word liberalism was your clue.
Again, I will try to remember you need things explained a bit more fully then others here.
Posted on 4/28/14 at 2:00 pm to CptBengal
well I don't like that line of attack, the article is relatively hackish.
An anonymous group funded the attacks, not some LGBT group. Now it could be LGBT, but they could be someone else entirely.
An anonymous group funded the attacks, not some LGBT group. Now it could be LGBT, but they could be someone else entirely.
Posted on 4/28/14 at 2:01 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:Did anyone come to his defense?
We are talking about one group here. He made a blanket statement regarding all gay, women, and black groups and that was ignorant.
Posted on 4/28/14 at 2:02 pm to goldennugget
quote:
He is being obtuse on purpose because he doesn't want to accept the truth
I think you're right. No one could have missed the intended point unless it was intentional.
Posted on 4/28/14 at 2:02 pm to wilfont
quote:
I would have assumed, my fault, that the intent to identify liberal groups was understood by most here. The usage of the word liberalism was intended to be your clue. It was not intended to included conservative advocacy groups. Again, the word liberalism was your clue.
Again, I will try to remember you need things explained a bit more fully then others here.
Lol your statement said all gay groups, black groups, women groups supported liberalism. All I was doing was clarifying.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News