- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It's embarrassing how Tulsi has so many of you fooled
Posted on 2/28/22 at 9:49 am to ApexTiger
Posted on 2/28/22 at 9:49 am to ApexTiger
quote:
but a clear and common sense thinking Democrat... who supports free speech, 1st amendment, 2nd amendment, constitution, and bill of rights
You sure about this one?
LINK
quote:
“Tulsi has a consistent record of advocating for sensible gun control,” a 2018 campaign statement announced. “She has long called for reinstating a federal ban on military-style assault weapons and high capacity magazines, requiring comprehensive pre-purchase background checks, closing the gun-show loophole, and making sure that terrorists are not allowed to buy guns. Tulsi has an F-rating from the NRA, a 0% rating by the Hawaii Rifle Association, and a 100% rating by the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. She is focused on building bipartisan solutions that can actually be passed into law, rather than using the issue as a partisan political football.”
LINK
I think she's making all the right noises when it comes to a few things as well, but this is not someone I'd want to cozy up with politically except as an enemy of my enemy.
Posted on 2/28/22 at 9:53 am to SCLibertarian
quote:
Do you honestly think the lion's share of the Republicans you support give a damn about the unborn, the 2nd Amendment or any of the issues you mentioned?
No, I don't. but I don't think the solution is to empower the party that actively wants to kill unborn children, actively wants to violate my 2A rights, and actively opposes all of the other issues. Tulsi is a Bernie supporting marxist, for God's sake. Look who you are advocating for.
John McCain was a piece of shite who is now dead and gone, and most likely burning in hell, if that's what God decided. Tulsi is a marxist tyrant, just like McCain, but in different ways. I don't think your freedom or liberty would be able to tell the difference. The only real difference is you libertarian types correctly deemed McCain the embodiment of evil, while you carry water for the other tyrant.
Posted on 2/28/22 at 9:55 am to stout
quote:
RINOS like Romeny, Paul, Cassidy, McCain,
Hell...I think Tulsi is more conservative than any of these folks.
quote:
Paul
Wait, huh?
Posted on 2/28/22 at 10:01 am to SquatchDawg
quote:
Hell...I think Tulsi is more conservative than any of these folks.
Well most of them are utter dogshit human beings, so the bar isn't very high, but...
Wrong.
Well shite. i can't get the link to work. Just google her voting record.
This post was edited on 2/28/22 at 10:04 am
Posted on 2/28/22 at 10:12 am to stout
My take is I wouldn't trust her to vote for her in carrying out my social and political beliefs, but we need the Tulsi's to sound the alarm against the extreme left socialist agenda. We need all of her types we can get to reach reasonable people on the left to stand for freedoms that are eroding.
Accepting her contribution in that regard is hardly supporting her to run for president or anything of the sort. Tulsi is hardly the standard of conservatism, but some of the stances she has taken are welcome and needed more of the same.
Bashing the likes of Romney, McConnell, cassidy, etc. should be expected because well they are voted in as Republican politicians, but consistently do RINO/uniparty things and deserve to be excoriated.
Accepting her contribution in that regard is hardly supporting her to run for president or anything of the sort. Tulsi is hardly the standard of conservatism, but some of the stances she has taken are welcome and needed more of the same.
Bashing the likes of Romney, McConnell, cassidy, etc. should be expected because well they are voted in as Republican politicians, but consistently do RINO/uniparty things and deserve to be excoriated.
Posted on 2/28/22 at 10:48 am to stout
except she's not liberal. Ron Paul is liberal.
Posted on 2/28/22 at 12:53 pm to stout
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 2/28/22 at 1:16 pm to SquatchDawg
quote:
Paul
Wait, huh?
Paul Ryan. Not Rand
Posted on 2/28/22 at 1:20 pm to stout
quote:Are you talking about Candice Owens, or Tulsi Gabbard, because this fits both.
After years of many of you bitching about RINOS like Romeny, Paul, Cassidy, McCain, etc yet here many of you are drooling over a grifter because she is suddenly saying a few things you agree with during a CPAC speech
Posted on 2/28/22 at 1:25 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
My take is I wouldn't trust her to vote for her in carrying out my social and political beliefs, but we need the Tulsi's to sound the alarm against the extreme left socialist agenda. We need all of her types we can get to reach reasonable people on the left to stand for freedoms that are eroding.
Accepting her contribution in that regard is hardly supporting her to run for president or anything of the sort. Tulsi is hardly the standard of conservatism, but some of the stances she has taken are welcome and needed more of the same.
Bashing the likes of Romney, McConnell, cassidy, etc. should be expected because well they are voted in as Republican politicians, but consistently do RINO/uniparty things and deserve to be excoriated.
I mean you have to work with these people at some point if we expect to be able to govern this country. Not going to see exactly eye-to-eye on everything and yes I want to see where she really stands on some of these issues as opposed to having to tow the line within her party. Hawaii is probably the most solid blue state there is so she had to work within that system.
There is a lot more that I would agree on with Tulsi than disagree on and she is at least a breath of fresh air compared to the radical left woke wing and the corrupt Biden/Hillary wing. I think support for Tulsi should be encouraged than shite on.
Posted on 2/28/22 at 1:31 pm to stout
I can appreciate that she stands by what she believes in. Many of those views are not my own so I can't back her. I will support statements she makes that I agree with though.
Posted on 2/28/22 at 1:43 pm to 14&Counting
quote:
I mean you have to work with these people at some point if we expect to be able to govern this country.
This is why we have spineless, capitulating republicans, right here. Nobody is out there telling marxist democrats that they have to work with conservatives, or even republicans, in order to be able to govern this country. Nope, they are being told that republicans and conservatives alike are to be destroyed at all costs. We are to be destroyed even if it means committing acts of war upon the American people, which is precisely what the fraudulent election was. At some point, some of you are going to wake up and realize that we are at war with these people. I don't know when it will be, but given what has been happening since the violence against Trum rally goers started in 2015, when you do it will probably be too late.
Posted on 2/28/22 at 1:48 pm to troyt37
quote:
This is why we have spineless, capitulating republicans, right here. Nobody is out there telling marxist democrats that they have to work with conservatives, or even republicans, in order to be able to govern this country. Nope, they are being told that republicans and conservatives alike are to be destroyed at all costs. We are to be destroyed even if it means committing acts of war upon the American people, which is precisely what the fraudulent election was. At some point, some of you are going to wake up and realize that we are at war with these people. I don't know when it will be, but given what has been happening since the violence against Trum rally goers started in 2015, when you do it will probably be too late.
and I am guessing you missed how Tulsi has been discussing and addressing exactly this problem
Posted on 2/28/22 at 1:56 pm to Chimlim
quote:
and good looks fool you
Looks like her face caught on fire and someone put it out with an ice pick.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconbarf.gif)
![](https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2021/01/640/320/GABBARD.jpg?ve=1&tl=1)
Posted on 2/28/22 at 2:05 pm to 14&Counting
quote:
and I am guessing you missed how Tulsi has been discussing and addressing exactly this problem
Yes, sorry. I pretty much completely ignore marxists. Since you are apparently in tune with Tulsi, please tell me the last 5 votes she has taken in opposition to her party, whether those votes were impactful or symbolic, and how many marxist democrats she was able to brin along with her to vote on the conservative side of the issue.
See, we are supposed to pee out pants over Tulsi speaking at CPAC, which we all know is all about establishment republicans pulling ever harder left, because you have to work with these people at some point if we expect to be able to govern this country, right? Now tell me, exactly what is Tulsi doing to pull her party right? Anything? Has she rejected marxism/socialism? Has she renounced efforts to violate the Second Amendment? Has she done a single thing to secure our open border, or prevent taxpayer dollars from going to the pockets of criminal illegals? Has she done anything at all to prevent taxpayer dollars from funding the murder of unborn children?
I can keep going, but I doubt we'll ever agree. You believe that the answer is in the squishy middle, where republicans and conservatives get to compromise away their principles and values, while the marxist democrats are allowed to keep theirs.
Posted on 2/28/22 at 2:24 pm to stout
quote:
Her record on wanting to limit gun rights should be the start and end of any conservative supporting her.
Are you too stupid to realize that there is more than one issue that you should have opinions on?
Are you too stupid to realize that people who share that one opinion might have a different opinion on another issue?
Are you too stupid to realize that you can work with certain people to advance a common issue and work with other people to advance another issue in common?
It seems you are.
Posted on 2/28/22 at 2:27 pm to 14&Counting
quote:
I mean you have to work with these people at some point if we expect to be able to govern this country. Not going to see exactly eye-to-eye on everything and yes I want to see where she really stands on some of these issues as opposed to having to tow the line within her party. Hawaii is probably the most solid blue state there is so she had to work within that system.
People like you are why the Republican Party is soft.
Soft people need to vote Democrat.
Posted on 2/28/22 at 2:28 pm to stout
Nice rack and all these weak frickers fall for it. Sad
Posted on 2/28/22 at 2:30 pm to Evolved Simian
quote:
Are you too stupid to realize that there is more than one issue that you should have opinions on?
Are you stupid?
Stop being lazy.
Go look at Gabbard's view on the issues.
She is a far left skank ho.
Posted on 2/28/22 at 2:33 pm to Evolved Simian
Are you too stupid to realize that if Tulsi didn't vote with, and advance the causes of marxist democrats 95% of the time, Hawaii would can her arse with the quickness? It seems you, and several others are.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)