- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It’s amazing to me how successfully the Left has normalized the unthinkable
Posted on 8/25/23 at 2:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 8/25/23 at 2:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Not me. He dropped a random non sequitur of a quotation, and I just wanted to know WTF he was talking about.
Nobody is litigating the HRC case except you (and maybe Hank)
This post was edited on 8/25/23 at 2:24 pm
Posted on 8/25/23 at 2:16 pm to davyjones
quote:
For instance a Rudy Giuliani type situation
Rudy has proven over and over again that he's not a very good attorney anymore. Trump selecting him would be on brand, though.
Posted on 8/25/23 at 2:19 pm to Y.A. Tittle
What’s more amazing is the millions of people who claim to be educated but fall for the “feelings” and “emotions” each election. It’s comical how gullible they are
Posted on 8/25/23 at 2:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
You asked:
And it was shown that apparently a Secretary of State is. Even though actual laws were broken (confirmed by the FBI head) And you have been trying to pull it apart ever since.
The entire point.
quote:
So you think a former President is immune from federal or state law?
And it was shown that apparently a Secretary of State is. Even though actual laws were broken (confirmed by the FBI head) And you have been trying to pull it apart ever since.
quote:
Nobody is litigating the HRC case
The entire point.
Posted on 8/25/23 at 2:26 pm to CleverUserName
quote:
So you think a former President is immune from federal or state law?
quote:
And it was shown that apparently a Secretary of State is.
What does a sitting SOS have to do with a former President
Former = not sitting
President = not SOS
quote:
The entire point.
Your whataboutism is noted and filed in the appropriate RAM slot.
This post was edited on 8/25/23 at 2:26 pm
Posted on 8/25/23 at 2:26 pm to davyjones
quote:
That’s what you’re supposed to elect Trump for, he’s got the most motivation to do so. And yes he is fully aware of the absolute necessity of selecting the exactly right Attorney General for this to occur, you can be assured.
His track record on that is right up there between Glass Joe and Vandy's football team.
Posted on 8/25/23 at 2:28 pm to SlowFlowPro
He’s discussing perfectly relevant legal precedent and you call it a whataboutism. This is how we know you aren’t serious. Just another poser skyscreaming lawyer. We already have AggieHank for that.
Posted on 8/25/23 at 2:29 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Show me all the fake elector schemes Al Gore coordinated.
Sorry, but there was no fake elector scheme.
What Christine Pelosi & the rest of the "Hamilton Electors" were doing after the 2016 election was far more egregious, as well as electors receiving death threats, etc...
Then there was Klobuchar, Warren, Warner, et al with scathing criticism of the voting machines/vendors via letters & hearings...
And of course, the blatant & unfounded disruption of the electoral vote count with nearly a dozen states challenged by the likes of Waters, Raskin, Jackson-Lee & other scumbags pleading for the required signatures from the floor.
All a bunch of election-denying hypocrites.
Posted on 8/25/23 at 2:33 pm to roadGator
quote:
They are scared shite less of Trump.
quote:
Why? Serious question.
Give it a break Road..your Ronbot fantsy is getting old!

Posted on 8/25/23 at 2:34 pm to Y.A. Tittle
The Dems encapsulate the politics of bad faith. Criminalizing one's opponents like a South American dictatorship? No worries. This extends to their rank and file-seemingly reasonable people who are totally onboard with all of it, while being completely oblivious to anything anybody named Clinton or Biden does. The Leftist mind, the Marxist psychology ALWAYS spins out of control into gulags and executions if it is not defeated. It's a historical constant and a near-certainty that if they complete their radical project, they will bring down upon the American people a reign of injustice and terror we have been uniquely lucky to avoid. There is nothing about The Lives of Others that a Democrat/Socialist/Progressive/Marxist truly thinks is beyond their authority. They can "improve" everything and they think they are improving America by going full Post-Constitutional on a US President that 81 million Americans voted for just 3 years ago. They have set something very very dangerous into motion and don't possess the wisdom to realize it.
Posted on 8/25/23 at 2:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I mean what Trump and his people/mouthpieces did after they lost the election AND January 6 were also pretty unthinkable a few years ago.
SFP is such a child...


Posted on 8/25/23 at 2:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What does a sitting SOS have to do with a former President
quote:
Former = not sitting
You do know Hillary was not SOS when it was actually found she had used the server and she had people delete evidence (classified evidence STILL on the server) don’t you? After a preservation order and a subpoena? She was not in office when that happened.
You know that… Right?
quote:
Obstruction was included. Hillary destroyed subpoenaed devices.
quote:
While in office. We are talking about out of office "immunity".
You didn’t!! My gosh. Three wasted freaking pages because of ignorance!
Good gosh!!
This post was edited on 8/25/23 at 2:45 pm
Posted on 8/25/23 at 2:38 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
How would you propose we divvy it up?
Which one(s) should I go after?
Which one(s) will you?
If you're implying violence, go sell that shite somewhere else.
I'm not a lawyer, so I don't think I'd get very far. But I think you'd find plenty of quotes and actions about the 2016 election to at least make some democrats worry.
Hell, I'd settle for a decent GOTV campaign. Republicans don't vote nearly as much as democrats.
Posted on 8/25/23 at 2:40 pm to Giantkiller
quote:
What's the difference between opposition that does nothing whatsoever, and opposition that barely stands in the way?
The reason I hate the Republicans only slightly less than the Democrats.
Posted on 8/25/23 at 2:43 pm to GetMeOutOfHere
quote:
If you're implying violence, go sell that shite somewhere else.
No, I'm ABSOLUTELY not. You were decrying "creaming in our pants over a mugshot" (which I didn't think I was doing either) versus actions of actually "going after" people (and I didn't think you were "implying violence"), so I was just simply wondering what you might have had in mind.

I do think a lot of the supposed leaders of the GOP seem particularly useless and or completely disinterested in a this situation, which is more than a bit troubling to me.
Posted on 8/25/23 at 2:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I mean what Trump and his people/mouthpieces did after they lost the election AND January 6 were also pretty unthinkable a few years ago.
Damn. That’s a sad attempt at whataboutism. You’re better than this SFP.
Posted on 8/25/23 at 2:44 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
If we could out Biden and trump in the same cell America would be the winner...
quote:
Who are you voting for

Posted on 8/25/23 at 2:47 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Rudy has proven over and over again that he's not a very good attorney anymore. Trump selecting him would be on brand, though.
First of all, I was referring generally to an individual who possesses those same type characteristics that are specific to the situation, i.e. someone having experienced the left’s nefarious and malicious tactics/acts up close, perhaps someone who would have reason to be personally offended and aggrieved by their actions. While also having general qualifications as well, i.e licensed attorney yadda yadda.
But since you raised the issue, I would opine that the basis for the overall gist of your opinion of Giuliani is heavily influenced by media sourced bias against him and cannot be awarded very much credibility pr reliability.
Posted on 8/25/23 at 2:48 pm to Y.A. Tittle
They have a bunch of pussies listening to them to do things
Posted on 8/25/23 at 2:49 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
No, I'm ABSOLUTELY not. You were decrying "creaming in our pants over a mugshot" (which I didn't think I was doing either) versus actions of actually "going after" people (and I didn't think you were "implying violence"), so I was just simply wondering what you might have had in mind.
I do think a lot of the supposed leaders of the GOP seem particularly useless and or completely disinterested in a this situation, which is more than a bit troubling to me.
We're on the same page.

Popular
Back to top
