- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It seems Mamoud khalil will likely win his immigration court hearing.
Posted on 4/10/25 at 4:23 pm to Pandy Fackler
Posted on 4/10/25 at 4:23 pm to Pandy Fackler
quote:
He's a permanent US resident
Mr. Khalil is here on a student visa. Those visas are revokable.
quote:
married to an American citizen
Irrelevant.
quote:
with a baby on the way.
Also irrelevant.
2
Posted on 4/10/25 at 4:24 pm to Riverside
quote:
the Fifth Circuit would be next up.
Posted on 4/10/25 at 4:25 pm to Riverside
Thank you. This whole playing on the emotions bullshite is annoying. Between this and the “Maryland father” angle of the other guy.
Since when did the left give a shite about fatherhood?!
Since when did the left give a shite about fatherhood?!
Posted on 4/10/25 at 4:25 pm to Pandy Fackler
They only need another reason and a midnight flight halfway to Africa.
Posted on 4/10/25 at 4:27 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
It seems more likely that Marco et al are saying "FU, we are exercising our Executive Branch authority, and the rest is none of the Judicial Branch's business."
Acceding the Judge's request would risk implying he had the authority to issue the order in the first place, thus setting precedent. Precedent is never something one branch voluntarily cedes to another. The Judge already has jurisdictional issues.
Look I'm no legal expert but I do know the guy had/has a right to sit before an immigration judge. I don't think anyone disputes this. So I guess it is the judicial branch's business.
It's an immigration case. She's an immigration judge. He has a right to an immigration hearing. How does the judge have "jurisdictional issues? This is her job.
Posted on 4/10/25 at 4:28 pm to Laugh More
Certainly marrying a citizen is good for purposes of applying for citizenship, but that’s not what is going on here.
Posted on 4/10/25 at 4:29 pm to Pandy Fackler
It’s more of a scope of review problem as opposed to jurisdiction.
Posted on 4/10/25 at 4:30 pm to Pandy Fackler
He cares deport his terrorist arse now
Posted on 4/10/25 at 4:30 pm to Riverside
quote:
Mr. Khalil is here on a student visa. Those visas are revokable.
No he isn't. Consider reading up on this case.
And being married to an American citizen with a baby on the way will definitely be relevant as this case moves further through the court system. Whether you want to believe it or not, it's a complicating factor.
Posted on 4/10/25 at 4:31 pm to Pandy Fackler
I think they should transfer him for his own safety. I sure hope they don't misplace him!
Posted on 4/10/25 at 4:31 pm to Pandy Fackler
quote:
Yes. He's a permanent US resident, married to an American citizen with a baby on the way.
I’m sure the Gaza radicals will welcome three more freedom fighters.
Posted on 4/10/25 at 4:33 pm to rtr72
quote:
He cares deport his terrorist arse now
I would be all for it if the Government could provide to the court system with any evidence at all that he's a terrorist, linked to a terrorist group or in some way supported a terrorist group through word or action.
This post was edited on 4/10/25 at 4:34 pm
Posted on 4/10/25 at 4:33 pm to Pandy Fackler
Just fyi, this is the statute the government is relying on to deport
INA 237(a)(4)(C)()
quote:
(C) Foreign policy
(i) In general
An alien whose presence or activities in the United States the Secretary of State has reasonable ground to believe would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States is deportable
INA 237(a)(4)(C)()
Posted on 4/10/25 at 4:34 pm to Pandy Fackler
quote:
Mahmoud Khalil, a student activist and lead negotiator for the encampment in the 2024 Columbia University pro-Palestinian campus occupations, was taken from his New York City apartment building by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents on March 8, 2025. The agents were acting on orders from the State Department to revoke Khalil's student visa.
Wrong.
Edit: Dipshite OP is apparently not recognizing that those on a student visa can also be considered “lawful permanent residents” if certain steps are taken. Both can be true simultaneously.
This post was edited on 4/10/25 at 4:43 pm
Posted on 4/10/25 at 4:35 pm to JimEverett
The OP isn’t particularly bright.
Posted on 4/10/25 at 4:37 pm to Pandy Fackler
quote:
they really didn't think this through at all.
Pretty much describes every action taken by this administration.
Posted on 4/10/25 at 4:38 pm to JimEverett
quote:
Just fyi, this is the statute the government is relying on to deport
quote:
(C) Foreign policy
(i) In general
An alien whose presence or activities in the United States the Secretary of State has reasonable ground to believe would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States is deportable
INA 237(a)(4)(C)()
Well that's pretty much all the Government has offered to the courts on this, but they either can't or have not articulated how that applies to this guy. How does he pose serious adverse foreign policy consequences?
How does this guy damage our relationship with Israel for instance?
This post was edited on 4/10/25 at 4:39 pm
Posted on 4/10/25 at 4:38 pm to Pandy Fackler
quote:
Yes. He's a permanent US resident, married to an American citizen with a baby on the way.
I could give two shits about his wife or baby. He's a fricking terrorist supporter and needs to go, and he will go. Sit back and watch what America First is about.
Posted on 4/10/25 at 4:39 pm to Pandy Fackler
This is explained in Secretary Rubio’s memo.
Easy case for the judge. She doesn’t get to second guess the Secretary of State.
Rubio Memo
Easy case for the judge. She doesn’t get to second guess the Secretary of State.
Rubio Memo
Posted on 4/10/25 at 4:40 pm to Pandy Fackler
quote:Jurisdiction? New Jersey? Louisiana? D.C.? Judicial vs Executive authority by Law?
How does the judge have jurisdictional issues? This is her job.
The SOS has extremely broad authority here.
Page 2 of 23
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News