- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It seems as though they may have him for real now
Posted on 9/24/19 at 11:11 am to tigerinDC09
Posted on 9/24/19 at 11:11 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
Well obstruction of justice
How many times are you going to come here... say “obstruction!!!!”... and leave embarrassed? How many times?
How many times does it take to see you are continually misled?
Who has been right on this board for 2 years and who has been wrong?
Why do you submit yourself to this humiliation and then keep following who caused you to be humiliated?
0
Posted on 9/24/19 at 11:11 am to tigerinDC09
Kinda like strong arming another country’s prosecutor to get fired to keep your son and his company from being investigated by withholding a billion or so dollars in aid.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 11:14 am to Bwmdx
quote:
Kinda like strong arming another country’s prosecutor to get fired to keep your son and his company from being investigated
No evidence exists that matches this assertion. In fact, the US, EU and IMF all wanted the prosecutor fired for NOT prosecuting corruption.
This post was edited on 9/24/19 at 11:15 am
Posted on 9/24/19 at 11:15 am to tigerinDC09
quote:Only one a-hole bragged about 6 hours and billions of dollars.
No evidence exists that matches this assertion. In fact, the US, EU and IMF all wanted the prosecutor fired for NOT prosecution corruption.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 11:15 am to SelaTiger
quote:
It seems as though they may have him for real now
Posted on 9/24/19 at 11:16 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
tigerinDC09
Honest question, do you take prescribed medicine for your obsession with Donald trump?
This isn't healthy.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 11:16 am to Nguyener
quote:
You're right. Americans have never fought for what they believe in or gone to war with each other.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 11:16 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
No evidence exists that matches this assertion. In fact, the US, EU and IMF all wanted the prosecutor fired for NOT prosecution corruption.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
**GASP**
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
Seriously??? No evidence??? You are dropping that??? After your drivel FOR 2 YEARS??!!
Posted on 9/24/19 at 11:17 am to BeeFense5
quote:
Honest question, do you take prescribed medicine for your obsession with Donald trump?
This isn't healthy.
The irony of this coming from a cult which calls him God Emperor is just beyond belief.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 11:17 am to tigerinDC09
quote:The actual lawyer for the whistleblower gave a “no comment” answer to that question.
A source close to the whistleblower's legal team pushed back strongly against the assertion that the intelligence Community's Inspector General would accept "third-hand disclosures" and that what the official "outlined about lack of personal knowledge and not within their course of work seems like the beginning of a smear by those trying to discredit the whistleblower."
I don’t believe a “source close to the whistleblower’s legal team”.
The whistleblower’s lawyer wouldn’t have said “no comment” had that been the case.
He has no reason to not answer that question.
It impacts nothing.
This post was edited on 9/24/19 at 11:18 am
Posted on 9/24/19 at 11:18 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
he irony of this coming from a cult which calls him God Emperor is just beyond belief.
You apparently struggle with satire.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 11:18 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
Abuse of Power is, by precedent, an impeachable offense.
Ah, so.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 11:18 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
He's just twisted in his lies.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 11:19 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
So can anyone answer why he sent an extra $140 Mil above what congress approved?
Because, while on the phone, he whispered "Get Biden and you'll get extra", not knowing that the whistleblower would hear him. He whispered it 8 times. "Get Biden and there's an extra $140 mill in it for you." Only he didn't count on the whistleblower using a SonicEar SuperEar® to listen in.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 11:19 am to BeeFense5
quote:
You apparently struggle with satire.
He struggles alright.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 11:19 am to SelaTiger
Well if he does down, Biden better go down with him.
But I don't think Trump is going down.
But I don't think Trump is going down.
This post was edited on 9/24/19 at 11:20 am
Posted on 9/24/19 at 11:30 am to Scruffy
quote:
Impeachment for hearsay?
That will be interesting.
And even if what was said is 100% accurate, where exactly is the high crime or misdemeanor?
Posted on 9/24/19 at 11:31 am to Geauxst Writer
quote:
Appears more likely the Dems will impeach
Please do this.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 11:34 am to tigerinDC09
Serious question since you believe he is guilty and you want impeachment...
3 Scenarios:
1)Impeachment proceedings proceed but the House does not get the votes
2)The House impeaches him but the Senate does not.
3)Both the House and the Senate vote to impeach. Pence is sworn in.
Does #1 help or hurt your cause?
Does #2 help or hurt your cause?
Does #3 help or hurt your cause?
I will be interested to see if you answer my questions or if you deflect and move the goal posts like usual.
3 Scenarios:
1)Impeachment proceedings proceed but the House does not get the votes
2)The House impeaches him but the Senate does not.
3)Both the House and the Senate vote to impeach. Pence is sworn in.
Does #1 help or hurt your cause?
Does #2 help or hurt your cause?
Does #3 help or hurt your cause?
I will be interested to see if you answer my questions or if you deflect and move the goal posts like usual.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 11:35 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
Well obstruction of justice which prevents the production of said evidence is itself evidence of the crime of obstruction of justice.
Due Process refutes that until a charge of Obstruction has been proven in a court of law.
So until that time all your "obstruction" claims are as substantive and solid as pixie dust and unicorn farts.
Page 5 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News