- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Israel / Hamas in a biblical context - any content recs?
Posted on 10/14/23 at 9:42 am to ugasickem
Posted on 10/14/23 at 9:42 am to ugasickem
quote:I respectfully disagree. No matter what a person believes regarding the end times, Christ wins. His people will be avenged. The wicked will be judged. Satan will be condemned. We will dwell forever in the light of God’s glory in renewed and glorified bodies.
These events, if it plays out the way it is written, in all forms of whatever you believe does not end good
No matter what happens before that (suffering and martyrdom, perhaps) it will most certainly end well for Christ’s people.
Posted on 10/14/23 at 9:46 am to Bayoutigre
quote:
born catholic here,catholic schooling
These are the credentials I was looking for! I eagerly await your critique of the Suma.
quote:
soul,satanism and human sacrifice,homosexuallity, happens in the Vatican.a good percentage of our priests are gay and pedo,
Peter denied Christ 3x and Judas sold Jesus for silver. Men sin and men hold offices within the Church.
Posted on 10/14/23 at 9:51 am to Bayoutigre
Iron mixed with clay.
Roman Catholic Church and Islam.
Roman Catholic Church and Islam.
Posted on 10/14/23 at 9:55 am to Foch
quote:
Peter denied Christ 3x and Judas sold Jesus for silver. Men sin and men hold offices within the Church.
You equating Peter with those things? lol.
And Jesus can’t get going if Judas doesn’t betray him. Consider Judas might have been the only one tough enough to accomplish the second most important act of sacrifice in history.
Posted on 10/14/23 at 10:42 am to Meauxjeaux
I’m a preteibulationalist and premillennialist…I believe that is the right view taught within the scripture. There will be a rapture of the Church and it will kick off the tribulation period. It’s the next event on God’s prophetic timetable…and after the 7 years Jesus will return and then there is a literal 1000 year reign of Christ on earth.
Posted on 10/14/23 at 10:56 am to SirWinston
Two notions that I am unable to square up through the lens of current events:
1) The land boundaries promised Abraham have yet to be occupied and settled by the Hebrews. They presently occupy but a sliver.
2) Should the 1) above come to pass, then I could envision global opposition from those against.
3) I believe a healthy % of Christianity - Protestants in particular - are consumed by End Times as they wish to avoid the carnage. I get that but for an Anti-Christ to appear, he is to bring peace and one doesn't bring peace to peace. Also, for all nations to concede their sovereignty to one, it has to be pretty screaming nasty. In other words, it would appear the 'body of Christ' will be present leading up to his coming out.
1) The land boundaries promised Abraham have yet to be occupied and settled by the Hebrews. They presently occupy but a sliver.
2) Should the 1) above come to pass, then I could envision global opposition from those against.
3) I believe a healthy % of Christianity - Protestants in particular - are consumed by End Times as they wish to avoid the carnage. I get that but for an Anti-Christ to appear, he is to bring peace and one doesn't bring peace to peace. Also, for all nations to concede their sovereignty to one, it has to be pretty screaming nasty. In other words, it would appear the 'body of Christ' will be present leading up to his coming out.
Posted on 10/14/23 at 11:16 am to First Sergeant1
I’m with you completely. It’s clearly laid out in Daniel, the Olivet discourse, and in revelation.
Posted on 10/14/23 at 12:27 pm to Stitches
quote:
Nero was the beast. The whore of Babylon was pagan Rome. The book primarily foretold the destruction of the Jewish temple in the 70s AD. The Rapture doctrine is the result of 19th century dispensationalism, and is almost entirely specific to American evangelicalism. Foo summed it up nicely.
Okay, SirWinston reporting back from the rabbit hole. Yes. This makes so much sense. It ticks more boxes than any imaginable scenario from today's world (No way any global political figure unites more than 33% of the globe, let alone the ENTIRE globe before revealing himself as a modern day antichrist. Also no way there is ever meaningful peace between Israel and their Muslim neighbours. Finally Ive always had a problem with how modern day Evangelicals just completely discount the SEVENTY PERCENT of the world's population that isn't raised in a historically Judeo-Christian nation. Over 5 billion people are just rendered completely irrelevant). Back in Paul's time there were only 200 million people on the planet, so the prophecies would have had a much greater chance of checking all the boxes (near universal approval of the eventual antichrist before he revealed himself).
So now, if one believes the antichrist has already happened. Where would that put us in Revelation speak today? Is Armageddon and Christ's final return still on the table? What about like the rebuilding of the temple in Israel and all? I'd especially like to hear from the non dispensationalists
This post was edited on 10/14/23 at 12:40 pm
Posted on 10/14/23 at 12:48 pm to SirWinston
Here's the world population map around when Paul wrote Revelation. Nero ruled like 67% of the known world. He ticks SO MANY of the boxes. And in the Rome 7 hills and the Nero 666 or 616 and it's so much closer than any modern day candidate could get.


Posted on 10/14/23 at 1:01 pm to SirWinston
quote:
So now, if one believes the antichrist has already happened.
The Bible speaks of many anti-christs. Anyone who doesn't proclaim Jesus as the Messiah is an anti-christ. However, THE anti-christ was Nero.
quote:
Where would that put us in Revelation speak today? Is Armageddon and Christ's final return still on the table?
Absolutely. Dispensationalists/Evangelicals tend to lump the tribulation and return of Christ in with the events laid out in Revelation. This is just a bad hermeneutic to be honest.
There will come a tribulation. Those who are saved and alive at the time will live through it (no rapture taking place beforehand), and then Christ will return to establish the new heaven and earth, and render final judgment.
In the dispensationalist/evangelical view, there is actually a second and third coming of the Lord.
quote:
What about like the rebuilding of the temple in Israel and all?
The Catholic church hasn't taken a definitive stance on a physical third temple being built. Some catholic theologians believe it will be rebuilt, and others believe Jesus in his resurrection and the establishment of his church was the fulfillment of the temple being rebuilt.
I fall into the latter category, in that the new covenant church is the temple.
This post was edited on 10/14/23 at 1:03 pm
Posted on 10/14/23 at 1:04 pm to Stitches
quote:So you are a Preterist? Do you believe in the Rapture (Partial Preterest)?
THE Anti-christ was Nero.
This post was edited on 10/14/23 at 1:07 pm
Posted on 10/14/23 at 1:10 pm to Stitches
Evangelicals don't realize it, but they are a heretical sect, with origins in the past 150 years at most. Their beliefs don't align with 2000 years of the Church, dozens of councils, elders in prayer, theologians, debates, over a thousand years.
I disagree with the Roman Catholics on plenty, but they are closer to what I believe is true than the Evangelicals.
I disagree with the Roman Catholics on plenty, but they are closer to what I believe is true than the Evangelicals.
Posted on 10/14/23 at 1:13 pm to Numberwang
Every pastor winds up being his own little "pope". Disagree with something your current church believes? Go down the road and start your own from scratch, with no accountability, no structure, nobody to check and balance your theology.
Protestants are a nutty bunch.
Protestants are a nutty bunch.
Posted on 10/14/23 at 1:13 pm to Diamondawg
quote:
So you are a Preterist?
Yeah, partial-preterist. I do believe in a future second coming, general resurrection, and final judgement. I also believe that most of what Revelation prophecied was fulfilled in the 70s AD.
quote:
Do you believe in the Rapture
In terms of a pre-tribulation rapture like Evangelicals believe, no. I do believe the dead in Christ followed by those still alive at the coming of the Lord will be "called up" to usher Him down to earth prior to the final judgement.
This post was edited on 10/14/23 at 1:25 pm
Posted on 10/14/23 at 1:13 pm to Stitches
Totally fishing for a compliment here, but what did you think of my research and rationale? I had a gas last night looking into this and watching videos. The internet is fantastic sometimes.
Posted on 10/14/23 at 1:15 pm to Numberwang
quote:
I disagree with the Roman Catholics on plenty, but they are closer to what I believe is true than the Evangelicals.
Catholics and historical Protestants have practically the same views on eschatology. I know that is a generalization, but still...
Posted on 10/14/23 at 1:17 pm to SirWinston
quote:
Totally fishing for a compliment here, but what did you think of my research and rationale?
I thought you did well. That's a pretty short summary of the mainstream catholic view.
Jimmy Akin video
Posted on 10/14/23 at 1:17 pm to Numberwang
Great stuff - thanks to everybody who answered (thanks to you and Stitches in particular, what you lads said resonated especially with me). That's what this site and this Board in particular is all about
Posted on 10/14/23 at 1:40 pm to Numberwang
quote:That's a problem with Congregationalism, not Protestantism. I’m a Protestant and a Presbyterian.
Every pastor winds up being his own little "pope". Disagree with something your current church believes? Go down the road and start your own from scratch, with no accountability, no structure, nobody to check and balance your theology.
Protestants are a nutty bunch.
Posted on 10/14/23 at 2:01 pm to SirWinston
Sir Winston I would look deeper. It’s a much deeper dive than just a basic reading of scripture. You have to take o to account what Daniel prophesied and what each of the symbolism means. Plus a thorough breakdown of the Olivate discourse and then Revelation.
Like I said check out Robert Breaker for simple breakdown of scripture.
I would check out Allen Nolan for deep dives into scripture
Allen Nolan YouTube
Like I said check out Robert Breaker for simple breakdown of scripture.
I would check out Allen Nolan for deep dives into scripture
Allen Nolan YouTube
Popular
Back to top



0




