
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/28/26 at 3:37 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Trump's failure to follow the law
Posted on 9/28/26 at 3:41 pm to bbvdd
quote:
Wait, you are the one that said that the UK police did a good job?
So what is it?
You understand there's a difference between the local police and British intelligence, right?
Here there's no evidence that British intelligence was responsible for the initial contact. The arrest was ordinary, local police work. The INVESTIGATION is being handled by national police NOW. There's no indication that the 5 were on the radar of ANY intelligence agency (American or British) BEFORE the local police responded to the tip and made the arrest.
quote:
A member of the public called police at about 12:45 a.m. Sunday, September 27, reporting three suspicious vehicles apparently heading toward RAF Fairford.
Armed officers responded and arrested the five men in Whelford, the nearby village.
Gloucestershire Police initially handled the incident locally.
The investigation was then taken over/led by Counter Terrorism Policing (CTP), the UK's national counterterrorism policing network.
Posted on 9/28/26 at 3:42 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
oh Hank.
Simple question: did Trump follow the law in basing the tariffs on IEEPA?
C'mon. I KNOW there's a shred of honesty left in you.
Posted on 9/28/26 at 3:44 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Broken fricking record every thread it's comical.
Posted on 9/28/26 at 3:45 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Seems like if we had actual intelligence on these 5 we would have shared that with the UK so that: - the "bombers" would have been arrested earlier - they wouldn't have been released on bond
Seems like this to an idiot
Posted on 9/28/26 at 3:55 pm to bbvdd
quote:
quote:He's trying to take credit for the UK's good police work. Are you fricking stupid?
Do you have to ask
Posted on 9/28/26 at 4:03 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
There's no indication that the 5 were on the radar of ANY intelligence agency (American or British) BEFORE the local police responded to the tip and made the arrest.
You know this because this type of info is readily available??
Posted on 9/28/26 at 4:04 pm to bbvdd
Ivory is confident!
And drops back to his tried and true
Why hasn't the data been released instantly!
And drops back to his tried and true
Why hasn't the data been released instantly!
Posted on 9/28/26 at 4:08 pm to IvoryBillMatt
There’s a better chance of finding a live ivory billed woodpecker than for ivorybillmatt to be correct.
Posted on 9/28/26 at 4:08 pm to Tiger2712
quote:
Yes he is exaggerating. He always does. He can not tell the truth. I voted him every time he was on the ballot
Amen! Why is this so hard for fellow Trump voters to accept?
It's engrained in his master salesman personality. Overall, Trump's complete personality has many more positives than negatives as far as being the person America needed as president during these times.
I'm guilty of pointing this out too often and forcefully here. At this point, people either see the lying or they don't. It's STILL amazing to me. I will try to tone it down.
Posted on 9/28/26 at 4:12 pm to beerJeep
quote:
There’s a better chance of finding a live ivory billed woodpecker than for ivorybillmatt to be correct.
Well both of those are 100% certitudes, but I will bite...other than predicting Perez (illegal alien shot in the back by ICE in Austin) would be swiftly deported...about what have I been incorrect?
Posted on 9/28/26 at 4:12 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Simple question: did Trump follow the law in basing the tariffs on IEEPA? C'mon. I KNOW there's a shred of honesty left in you.
The court said no. Is that the hill you will die on? Trump doesn’t follow the law because after 6 years you can talk about Tariffs. Oh…and even you know he can levy tarrifs…the court just said he can’t rely on IEEPA. If that’s your big gotcha…that’s just sad. Hank.
Do you think Clarence Thomas is a competent jurist?
This post was edited on 9/28/26 at 4:14 pm
Posted on 9/28/26 at 4:17 pm to bbvdd
quote:
You know this because this type of info is readily available??
I know this because they were arrested only because of a tip to local police by a local farmer.
I also know it because, for better or worse, this Administration is so heavily into messaging. If they had anything to support the President's claims they would have produced it.
Posted on 9/28/26 at 4:25 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
The court said no. Is that the hill you will die on? Trump doesn’t follow the law because after 6 years you can talk about Tariffs. Oh…and even you know he can levy tarrifs…the court just said he can’t rely on IEEPA. If that’s your big gotcha…that’s just sad. Hank.
Do you think Clarence Thomas is a competent jurist?
Of course, that's not my only example, it's just such an obvious example. The President had many more options other than IEEPA that WOULD have worked.
The President COULD have appointed someone other than Halligan who would have met the statutory requirements to be USA for EDVA. He got bad legal advice.
Quit being such a contrarian dick. The Administration pushes the boundaries of the law to stretch them in favor of a more powerful President. Sometimes they cross legal boundaries. You know this.
Posted on 9/28/26 at 5:14 pm to Marshhen
quote:
You are a naive pussy who doesn’t understand humanity
Pop quiz: was North Vietnam actually a threat to the United States? They prevailed in the Indochina War. North Vietnam is a close trading partner with the United States. How was North Vietnam actually threat to the US?
Tell me how I am the naive pussy? It seems that you are. In matters of war and profit, our government tends to lie to us.
Do you think the Spanish actually blew up the USS Maine?
Was the war in Iraq a good investment in blood and treasure? Trump thought we were lied to about that. Is he a naive pussy?
Posted on 9/28/26 at 5:14 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Is the President fricking stupid? HE'S the one who said that the US had these men under investigation. He also said that "WE know all about them, and you will hear about it very soon...WE caught them."
And instead of waiting for "very soon," you are here trying to convince everyone the US had nothing to do with it despite the limited information as if you have an emotional attachment to disproving Trump.
Your primary interest in the story is to prove Trump wrong, not seek the truth.
Posted on 9/28/26 at 5:16 pm to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:
Your primary interest in the story is to prove Trump wrong, not seek the truth.
He’ll protest otherwise because he really thinks nobody notices, but that’s just about every thread he starts.
Posted on 9/28/26 at 5:55 pm to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:
Your primary interest in the story is to prove Trump wrong, not seek the truth.
It's just the obviousness of the pattern...and the absurdity of the statement. Trump makes up something off the top of his head ("We're charging a 20% fee for all cargo passing through the Strait of Hormuz!"), and then that statement gets officially ignored or quietly walked back.
In this case, Trump's first comment was an off the cuff statement in answer to a reporter's question. Clearly, no one briefed him on how to handle the obvious question.
The video is short. Listen to it. It's really entertaining to watch him make it up on the spot...to sound like this was some great victory for American intelligence.
quote:
Working with the British was great. It may have been Scotland Yard. I don't know. We work with a lot of them. We had them under view for a long time and we got them."
You left it up to a middle-aged female farmer to report them to the local Gloucestershire police so that the local police could make the arrest of these hardened terrorists who were out to do "great damage to our fort?" AND Scotland Yard, or whoever we're working with, didn't charge the hardened terrorists with any crimes...AND released them from custody?
Y'all really believe what the President said about these guys and our supposed long-term investigation of them?
I will stop now, and wait for Trump to give the details to back up his assertion like he promised. I expect we will see those details
-just after the double tap video of the killing of the boat survivors (as Trump promised, but didn't deliver),
-but before the Pentagon's report on the Minab Girls School bombing (which the Pentagon has promised, but not delivered).
I know we're the good guys. It's the lack of transparency that leads to any thought that the powers that be don't think we're the good guys...or that facts are just invented to fit a narrative.
This post was edited on 9/28/26 at 6:06 pm
Posted on 9/28/26 at 5:56 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Is Trump exaggerating
The answer is yes; didnt read anything further

Popular
Back to top


0









