- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is it just the memo? Or are they releasing supporting documentation as well?
Posted on 1/30/18 at 2:09 pm to Salmon
Posted on 1/30/18 at 2:09 pm to Salmon
quote:How would we know?
Is it just the memo? Or are they releasing supporting documentation as well? by Salmon
In all honesty, let's be sensible here.
No one at the FBI got so aggravated they pulled the plug on McCabe over a "memo" that has no references.
So. I suspect that this "memo" isn't exactly your garden variety memorandum for record.
I guess we'll see.
0
Posted on 1/30/18 at 2:11 pm to Tiger Prawn
Tip of the iceberg...IG report is the big deal
Posted on 1/30/18 at 2:12 pm to Salmon
quote:
I guess I grow weary of petty political games
Dude. You do realize that we've met you, right?
Posted on 1/30/18 at 2:12 pm to Salmon
quote:
I thought they were pushing for supporting documentation as well
No you didn't.
Posted on 1/30/18 at 2:13 pm to moneyg
quote:
No you didn't.
That's what made this line from him so lulz
quote:
I guess I grow weary of petty political games
Posted on 1/30/18 at 2:24 pm to thetigerman
quote:At some point in time they started spying on Americans and leaking info about their findings to the media in order to influence public opinion.
Compromised how?
quote:That's what we're gonna find out. There are some very obvious conclusions
By whom?
quote:Again we'll find out. Political gain I would presume.
For what end?
This post was edited on 1/30/18 at 2:25 pm
Posted on 1/30/18 at 2:31 pm to Canada_Baw
quote:Me personally? The only choice I would have is to believe them or not. The weight of the evidence is what would convince me.
Couldn’t agree more about due process - but if said due process was carried out by your congressman with you never seeing or hearing of the underlying documents would you take his word on it?
In this case, the Democrats on the HIC who voted not to release it didn't say it was false or full of lies, which would be an indicator to me that it was false (though I'm not inclined to believe Democrats generally).
Also, if the FBI was allowed to look at it while they are the subject of many of the issues purportedly contained in the memo and come away from it saying it's factual, it lends support to it even if I don't see the underlying supporting documents.
The initial arguments that I was hearing against the release of the memo was essentially two-fold: it was mean and disparaging of our intelligence agencies (who cares, if it's true?) and it contained classified information that could put us at risk. It wasn't about the truthfulness of the information.
This post was edited on 1/30/18 at 2:32 pm
Posted on 1/30/18 at 2:32 pm to Salmon
quote:It is my understanding it was. It may be heavily redacted. We will see shortly.
wasn't the memo also classified?
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News