- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is it a prerequisite to be intellectually dishonest to be a Dim?
Posted on 6/12/19 at 3:26 am to Bass Tiger
Posted on 6/12/19 at 3:26 am to Bass Tiger
"Intellectually dishonesty" is a badge of honor for commies posing as Democrats (and their lackeys). They've resurrected this ideology from the old soviet playbook.
Look how far they've ridden this Russian Interference scam. No one believes it. Not even them. Yet this poor fiction still dominates the MSM news cycles.
Look how far they've ridden this Russian Interference scam. No one believes it. Not even them. Yet this poor fiction still dominates the MSM news cycles.
This post was edited on 6/12/19 at 5:25 am
Posted on 6/12/19 at 5:18 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
equal rights = special condemnation for normal people
voter suppression = allow anyone to walk up and cast a vote
obstruction of justice = protecting yourself from made up assertions
Equal rights has a tangible metric. Expecting equal outcomes is problematic.
Anyone who is a legal resident of the state should vote. If your referring to illegals voting, that honestly rarely happens. I've seen no proof that this happens on a large scale.
If the accusations are false, they should be easily disproved. Having alot if outside evidence or acquaintances who commit crimes isn't good publicity.
I'm not saying Trump committed a crime. Just saying this a lesson in 'the company you keep'.
This post was edited on 6/12/19 at 5:21 am
Posted on 6/12/19 at 5:39 am to Bass Tiger
Being intellectually dishonest, sick minded and pathetic is what makes a democrat a democrat. It's in the morons DNA.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 5:41 am to CelticDog
Just like you lie with every keystroke?
Posted on 6/12/19 at 6:11 am to volod
quote:
If your referring to illegals voting, that honestly rarely happens. I've seen no proof that this happens on a large scale.
I'm talking about illegal voting - not saying that it is just illegal aliens who vote.
Now al lot of what I mean when I say "illegal" is really just unethical. For instance, I think that sending vans to haul homeless people who most likely dent even know there is an election going on to the polls to "vote" is 'legal' only if they were previously 'registered' and that most probably happened by some 'registration drive' where masses of radicals went out and secured a mass of 'registrations' that could later be used as a reservoir of potential votes by dragging a homeless guy to the polls and telling him what hs 'name' is = all perfectly "legal" only because it is too hard to investigate and prove.
But if you think that 100% voter turnout in 'some' precincts is actually perfectly normal then bless your heart.
What the fear of "illegals voting" is all about is the absolute root of the DEMOCRAT reluctance to do anything about the border crisis. The ONLY reason the DEMs are not trying to secure the border is that they are ONLY going to accept a 'solution' that grants amnesty and citizenship to 22,000,000 illegals already here. With that new 'voter base" they could never lose any election anywhere anytime.
DEMOCRATs have been allowing dead people to 'vote' since before Illinois cemetaries handed the victory to JFK back in 1960.
Now of course I am a hard arse on voting. I do NOT think it is OK to drag ignorant, unmotivated, irresponsible people to the polls on election day. I think that there should be some sort of individual commitment and responsibility to make plans to get to the polls on their own, and more importantly should actually know something about how the government works and show some motivation to have actually found out some facts about the election issues.
What the DEMOCRATs rely on is an IGNORANT base who vote on temporary 'feelings' derived from constant assault from biased propaganda and who are completely willing to cast their vote based on whoever drives them to the polls and slips them some 'walking around' money - or promises them something for nothing.
DEMOCRATs disgust me at every level of my consciousness. There is not an honest DEMOCRAT politician in the nation today.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 6:13 am to Bass Tiger
quote:I've been searching for this "feeling" I get every time a Dem opens their mouth. Thank you for clearing that up!
intellectually dishonest
Posted on 6/12/19 at 6:14 am to volod
quote:
I'm not saying Trump committed a crime. Just saying this a lesson in 'the company you keep'.
And I am not saying that Obama is a child rapist. Just that there is a lesson in 'the company you keep.'
Posted on 6/12/19 at 6:33 am to Bass Tiger
In order to be a progressive you have to throw out and abandon things such as honor, honesty, morality, self respect, and decency. I'd also add dignity goes out the window too. I've never seen one that thought anything I listed was a worthy trait or even meant anything. A progressive doesn't have a moral code they can and do justify anything done in the name of their ideology.
This post was edited on 6/12/19 at 6:34 am
Posted on 6/12/19 at 6:46 am to volod
quote:
If your referring to illegals voting, that honestly rarely happens. I've seen no proof that this happens on a large scale.
Why do they register? just for fun
You don't know anything about vote harvesting in CA do you?
Posted on 6/12/19 at 6:51 am to CelticDog
I do. Regardless, start a thread on that of you would like. But, answer the question first.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 6:54 am to Bass Tiger
Bass, you start a thread about the purported intellectual dishonesty of ALL people who disagree with you, and then you cite an example that simply REEKS of intellectual dishonesty on your own part.
You assert that MOST supporters of abortion rights essentially argue that “IT’S A CHILD WHEN THE WOMAN DECIDES IT’S A CHILD UP TO AND INCLUDING BIRTH!“
The very, very simple fact is that “most” supporters of abortion rights do NOT take this position. MOST supporters of abortion rights ACKNOWLEDGE that there exists some point after which abortion is generally inappropriate and should no longer be an option (with exceptions for certain purely medical issues). (For me, that point is somewhere in the range of 16-20 weeks, but I could be convinced to support 12). MOST supporters of abortion rights actively oppose later-term measures such as “partial birth abortion” as a purely elective procedure. (This is certainly my position). Etcetera.
The polling demonstrates that al of these assertions are true. Posting on this forum by multiple, thoughtful supporters of abortion rights is consistent with the positions outlined in the preceding paragraph. There are several posts on this very thread consistent with that analysis. (e.g. Sammy).
You SHOULD be aware of these facts, yet you continue to insist that “most” supporters of abortion rights have the opposite view.
Either you are totally unaware of the facts, or you have convinced yourself of the existence of something that is demonstrably untrue.
I submit that THIS is intellectual dishonesty of the highest order.
As an aside, this post addresses ONLY the question of “intellectual dishonesty.”. The substantive issues related to abortion have been discussed ad infinitum, and I will ignore any response which attempts to drag those substantive issues into this thread.
You assert that MOST supporters of abortion rights essentially argue that “IT’S A CHILD WHEN THE WOMAN DECIDES IT’S A CHILD UP TO AND INCLUDING BIRTH!“
The very, very simple fact is that “most” supporters of abortion rights do NOT take this position. MOST supporters of abortion rights ACKNOWLEDGE that there exists some point after which abortion is generally inappropriate and should no longer be an option (with exceptions for certain purely medical issues). (For me, that point is somewhere in the range of 16-20 weeks, but I could be convinced to support 12). MOST supporters of abortion rights actively oppose later-term measures such as “partial birth abortion” as a purely elective procedure. (This is certainly my position). Etcetera.
The polling demonstrates that al of these assertions are true. Posting on this forum by multiple, thoughtful supporters of abortion rights is consistent with the positions outlined in the preceding paragraph. There are several posts on this very thread consistent with that analysis. (e.g. Sammy).
You SHOULD be aware of these facts, yet you continue to insist that “most” supporters of abortion rights have the opposite view.
Either you are totally unaware of the facts, or you have convinced yourself of the existence of something that is demonstrably untrue.
I submit that THIS is intellectual dishonesty of the highest order.
As an aside, this post addresses ONLY the question of “intellectual dishonesty.”. The substantive issues related to abortion have been discussed ad infinitum, and I will ignore any response which attempts to drag those substantive issues into this thread.
This post was edited on 6/12/19 at 7:09 am
Posted on 6/12/19 at 7:04 am to AggieHank86
quote:
I will ignore any response which attempts to drag those substantive issues into this thread
This kind of egomaniacal proclamation is why... Never mind. You wouldn't see it if it bit you. That's why you are you.
Bless your heart.
This post was edited on 6/12/19 at 7:06 am
Posted on 6/12/19 at 7:11 am to roadGator
quote:You see an attempt to stay on topic and to avoid derailing a thread as egomaniacal. Good Lord.
This kind of egomaniacal proclamation is why...
Posted on 6/12/19 at 7:13 am to AggieHank86
You didn't need to make an egomaniacal proclamation. You can't see that? Of course you can't.
Eta: have a good day hank. I'll let you put your perceived superiority on display without bother.
I've never seen such an egomaniac so I should just watch and learn.
Eta: have a good day hank. I'll let you put your perceived superiority on display without bother.
I've never seen such an egomaniac so I should just watch and learn.
This post was edited on 6/12/19 at 7:17 am
Posted on 6/12/19 at 7:15 am to CelticDog
How's that hangover treating you today?
Posted on 6/12/19 at 7:18 am to roadGator
quote:Posting history says that a half dozen posters (several of which I could, but will not, list by name) were going to do that which I described. I tried to head it off by making it clear that I would not play that game in this thread.
You didn't need to make an egomaniacal proclamation. You can't see that? Of course you can't.
You see ego. I see history.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 7:19 am to AggieHank86
quote:
You see ego
I do. Check my sig.
Have a wonderful day, my narcisist friend.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 7:35 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Bass, you start a thread about the purported intellectual dishonesty of ALL people who disagree with you,
Nope. He said democrats, I'm sure there are non democrats that disagree with him.
quote:
You assert that MOST supporters of abortion rights essentially argue that “IT’S A CHILD WHEN THE WOMAN DECIDES IT’S A CHILD UP TO AND INCLUDING BIRTH
Nope again.
He said he believes this is there view but most refuse to say it likely because it's so patently ridiculous.
0/2
I'll leave the rest of your drivel for others to dismantle.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News