- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Is Alberta to the US as a state a real possibility?
Posted on 5/12/25 at 12:06 pm
Posted on 5/12/25 at 12:06 pm
Do you think Trump makes this happen
Posted on 5/12/25 at 12:11 pm to PSS101
I hope so
Others will follow if so
Others will follow if so
Posted on 5/12/25 at 12:12 pm to PSS101
Albertans would have to push independence.
Posted on 5/12/25 at 12:12 pm to PSS101
Man, I hope so. Skiing Banff without having to go to Canada would be amazing. Plus, I’d likely by land up there for retirement.
Posted on 5/12/25 at 12:13 pm to PSS101
As long as it's only Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba, maybe Yukon and the Northwest Territory, then okay. The rest has to stay in Canada.
Posted on 5/12/25 at 12:14 pm to RolltidePA
quote:
As long as it's only Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba,
these are the only 3 that are in the conversation I would think. I would give them Minnesota

Posted on 5/12/25 at 12:14 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
Albertans would have to push independence.
And right now they're discussing the possibility
Posted on 5/12/25 at 12:16 pm to PSS101
quote:
these are the only 3 that are in the conversation I would think. I would give them Minnesota
The only reason I say Yukon and the Northwest Territory is that it would be advantageous to connect Alaska as part of the continental US.
Posted on 5/12/25 at 12:16 pm to PSS101
It would mean 2 more Democrats perpetually in the Senate, and however many more electoral votes for Democrats.
Posted on 5/12/25 at 12:18 pm to PSS101
Yes. Canada is a fragile confederation held together by bribes and intimidation, united by a shared culture of loyalty to a fault. Those bribes are paid at the expense of Alberta, and Alberta is wondering why they are always expected to pay the price so that Quebec and the Maritimes stay loyal to Ottowa. Why wouldn’t Alberta’s money be better spent on Alberta?
Without Alberta’s resources, Canada’s economy and government services collapse overnight. Without Alberta’s money to pay Ottowa’s bribes to Quebec, the Quebecois immediately lose any semblance of faux loyalty to Ottowa or the English crown. Without control of Quebec or Alberta, Ottowa has no means of maintaining control over BC or the Maritimes.
Canada collapses without Alberta. Alberta flourishes without Canada, and both sides know that.
Without Alberta’s resources, Canada’s economy and government services collapse overnight. Without Alberta’s money to pay Ottowa’s bribes to Quebec, the Quebecois immediately lose any semblance of faux loyalty to Ottowa or the English crown. Without control of Quebec or Alberta, Ottowa has no means of maintaining control over BC or the Maritimes.
Canada collapses without Alberta. Alberta flourishes without Canada, and both sides know that.
This post was edited on 5/12/25 at 12:25 pm
Posted on 5/12/25 at 12:18 pm to PSS101
Good god please no. Even the so called conservative areas of Canada are closer to our democrats. They’ve been conditioned and accustomed to lots and lots of free shite like healthcare. They will vote Democrat by and large.
Posted on 5/12/25 at 12:20 pm to PSS101
I'd rather see them as an independent country but I just hope they get out regardless.
Popular
Back to top
