- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:40 am to stout
SFP the simpering cuck and enemy of the American people won't like this
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:40 am to TigerSprings
quote:
We had an "insurrection" without firearms,
Who was charged with the crime of insurrection?
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:46 am to Miner
quote:
You cannot be serious.
Easily top 3 dumbest posters of all time.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:07 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Who was charged with the crime of insurrection?
Like Jan 6thPosted on 3/18/25 at 10:24 am to SlowFlowPro
You remind me of any run of the mill hipster who thinks he is the smartest person in the room but lacks any real common sense or life experience. Common sense would tell you that 64 in four years is a bit much but you can’t help yourself
Posted on 3/18/25 at 12:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You'd have to get into subjective evaluation of each EO and how norm-defying or presumed illegal and compare to the injunctions.
The subjective nature of the initial evaluation would never lead to any consensus one way or the other.
You are such a douche. The most amazing thing is that you think this retarded act makes you look smart. You only fool yourself.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 1:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
Slowflowjoe I don’t get you at all. You’re some ambulance chaser that seems to spend every day on this site exposing your arrogance about every single topic. You must have the same amount of business as the Maytag repairman.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 1:42 pm to stout
92.2% of those Trump 1 injunctions were by judges in the opposite political party. It also doesn't count vacatur. Harvard Law Review
Thus, the increase of the District Court's decisions with nationwide implication is even larger.
Thus, the increase of the District Court's decisions with nationwide implication is even larger.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 1:49 pm to TBoy
quote:You provided the process, but you have not provided the "issue"
he issue is using, for the first time, the 1798 Alien Exclusion Act.
What's the issue?
Posted on 3/18/25 at 1:59 pm to stout
Uniparty average: 1.3/YR
Trump average: 15.8/YR
a 1000% increase.
But but but; “lawfare doesn’t exist”
But but but “what even is lawfare?”
Trump average: 15.8/YR
a 1000% increase.
But but but; “lawfare doesn’t exist”
But but but “what even is lawfare?”
Posted on 3/18/25 at 2:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Who was charged with the crime of insurrection?
Are you trying to make a distinction between insurrection and seditious conspiracy?
Roberto Minuta, 38, of Prosper, Texas; Joseph Hackett, 52, of Sarasota, Florida; David Moerschel, 45, of Punta Gorda, Florida; and Edward Vallejo, 64, of Phoenix, Arizona, Elmer Stewart Rhodes III and Kelly Meggs were all convicted of seditious conspiracy. DOJ
If so, what is your point? The Jan 6 committee uses the word "insurrection" 78 times. Final Report
Two things appear unassailable:
(1) Politically, the word "insurrection" was used to describe the events of Jan. 6 including among members of the legislative branch.
(2) A number of people were found guilty of a felony with a maximum sentence of 20 years for their participation in Jan 6.
This post was edited on 3/18/25 at 2:07 pm
Posted on 3/18/25 at 2:13 pm to TBoy
quote:The judge didn't say it was a violation of that Act.
Of course it does. As you know (but are apparently programed to omit from your public statements) the issue is not removal and deportation. The issue is using, for the first time, the 1798 Alien Exclusion Act. The Trump administration could have deported the gang members using the ordinary law, but that would have requires a likely very short deportation hearing where the government would have had to show that the deportees are not on legal status. Instead, Trump (unlike any other president in history) claimed that due process is suspended under a 1798 law that applies during time of war. We are not at war.
The court hearings and temporary injunction for such an action were a certainty. The Trump administration knows that we are not at war. The Trump administration knows (as do you) that due process is not suspended. We are not at war. Special war powers are not available. The ordinary law is not suspended.
That's the issue, and you know it. But please, continue pretending that you don't.
Page 2 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News