- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Indiana Activist Judge Rules There is a ‘Religious Right’ to Kill Babies in Abortions
Posted on 3/7/26 at 11:29 am to SallysHuman
Posted on 3/7/26 at 11:29 am to SallysHuman
Judaism being a Bronze Age religion and being a guide to living more than what we conceptualize as a religion is going to create some leeway on those issues. It was written for a different population in a different temporal setting with different needs to create the demand for the religion to be created.
2
Posted on 3/7/26 at 11:30 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
don't think being able to accuse state the law is a sin.
Being a attorney normally gets you shipped to hell. Your ability to lie is on par with Ole Morningstar himself.
Then add in your support for drag queens and trannys along with pedophiles are just icing on the cake.
Posted on 3/7/26 at 11:32 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
An unborn fetus not being a person isn't an "exception", though.
Of course it is.
Abortion is murder, and any laws that don't treat it as such are insufficient.
Posted on 3/7/26 at 11:33 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It was written for a different population in a different temporal setting with different needs to create the demand for the religion to be created.
The OT is full of the sanctity of preborn life. What are you even talking about?
Posted on 3/7/26 at 11:35 am to SOSFAN
quote:
Then add in your support for drag queens and trannys along with pedophiles are just icing on the cake.
What the frick
Posted on 3/7/26 at 11:36 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
Of course it is.
Abortion is murder, and any laws that don't treat it as such are insufficient.
You admit you have nothing to contribute to the actual conversation yet you chose to jump in to display that fact
Posted on 3/7/26 at 11:36 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What the frick
Ironically that's how most of us respond to your word salad responses.
Posted on 3/7/26 at 11:36 am to SallysHuman
quote:
The OT is full of the sanctity of preborn life
The Old testament has issues with the sanctity of all life with how many people get justifiably killed
Posted on 3/7/26 at 11:40 am to SlowFlowPro
Judge is likely a Jew. If so could be considered biased or not impartial and should have recused in a matter of religious faith.
Posted on 3/7/26 at 11:43 am to antibarner
quote:
Judge is likely a Jew. If so could be considered biased or not impartial and should have recused in a matter of religious faith.
Jews and Christians who claim those belief systems favor abortion are either lying or misled.
Posted on 3/7/26 at 11:44 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The Old testament has issues with the sanctity of all life with how many people get justifiably killed
1. Goal post---------------->>>>>>>>>
2. Justifiable killing does not negate the sanctity of life.
3. I've seen you comment on the Bible before, you'd do better to read it before arguing against it.
Posted on 3/7/26 at 11:47 am to lake chuck fan
quote:
class of plaintiffs who claim their faith requires them to terminate pregnancies.
If that were the case, that "faith" would've died out long ago.
Posted on 3/7/26 at 11:51 am to Tantal
If this judge is Jewish or has family that is or was, she should have stepped down. She should not have heard this case any more that if the Catholic Church were sued by someone and it fell to a Catholic judge, or one that had family that was.
Posted on 3/7/26 at 12:02 pm to Narax
It’s so weird to see people trying to rationalize the killing of babies in their mother’s wombs. Truly the most disgusting and shameful act ever.
Posted on 3/7/26 at 12:11 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Slow isn’t even attempting to provide his opinion. You’re made at the law and making him answer for it.
No, I’m asking a question about the logic of his statement that legally fetuses aren’t human. In many states a person can and will be charged with two homicides if a pregnant woman is killed. So that would call into question whether or not a fetus is seen as not being a person legally.
Posted on 3/7/26 at 12:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I made no argument about anything that would lead a reasonable person to ask this question.
TBH, you did say that unborn babies were not a person until born, "for basically all legal purposes".
Yet when we define murder, we see that is the premeditated killing of a person. We also know that individuals can be prosecuted for the murder of an unborn infant. In other words, the premeditated killing of the person who has yet to be born.
Therefore, since murder is most definitely a "legal purpose", you are wrong in your assertion.
Louisiana man charged for 2nd degree murder of unborn child
This post was edited on 3/7/26 at 12:39 pm
Posted on 3/7/26 at 12:54 pm to jnethe1
quote:
It’s so weird to see people trying to rationalize the killing of babies in their mother’s wombs. Truly the most disgusting and shameful act ever.
Fully agreed in every way.
Posted on 3/7/26 at 12:56 pm to lake chuck fan
So, if someone's religious beliefs demand that they execute judges who make decisions like this, would that person be immune from prosecution as well?
Posted on 3/7/26 at 12:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The claim was brought via federal law, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA)
Does the RFRA include Molech? Molechites probably feeling a little left out.
Posted on 3/7/26 at 12:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The Old testament has issues with the sanctity of all life with how many people get justifiably killed
The OT has no sanctity of life issues.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News