- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Indiana Activist Judge Rules There is a ‘Religious Right’ to Kill Babies in Abortions
Posted on 3/7/26 at 8:20 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 3/7/26 at 8:20 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
An unborn fetus not being a person isn't an "exception", though.
So a baby isn’t a person until it is born? If the baby was hypothetically born on May 13th, you’d be okay if it were aborted May 12th simply because it was inside its mother’s womb? What stopping you from being able to kill it right after it comes out? The location of it?
1
Posted on 3/7/26 at 8:22 am to GeauxLSUGeaux
quote:
So a baby isn’t a person until it is born?
For basically all legal purposes? Yes.
quote:
If the baby was hypothetically born on May 13th, you’d be okay if it were aborted May 12th simply because it was inside its mother’s womb?
I made no such argument about anything that would lead a reasonable person to ask this question.
Posted on 3/7/26 at 8:24 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It is not a legal/juridical person. That's a statement of legal status (not even an "argument" as you mischaracterized in your gotcha attempt question)
So if a pregnant woman is killed, should their be 1 or 2 counts of homicide?
Posted on 3/7/26 at 8:29 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I made no such argument about anything that would lead a reasonable person to ask this question.
You literally said this:
quote:
An unborn fetus not being a person
Hence my question that you failed to answer. I’ll ask again, is it the location of the baby that makes it a person? Because if the baby is unborn on May 12th and born on May 13th, is it only considered a person once it leaves its mother’s womb? Because the only thing different about the actual baby is the location of it.
Also
quote:
For basically all legal purposes? Yes.
For all legal purposes? So what about those who killed a pregnant woman and get charged with two counts of murder? Shouldn’t it only be one count if the fetus isn’t a person?
This post was edited on 3/7/26 at 8:34 am
Posted on 3/7/26 at 8:29 am to jnethe1
quote:
So if a pregnant woman is killed, should their be 1 or 2 counts of homicide?
I made no argument about anything that would lead a reasonable person to ask this question.
Posted on 3/7/26 at 8:32 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
An unborn fetus not being a person isn't an "exception", though.
Unlike corporations...
Those are persons too...
Posted on 3/7/26 at 8:34 am to Narax
quote:
Unlike corporations...
Those are persons too...
Correct, for legal purposes. The fetus would be equivalent to the negotiations that go on prior to forming the corporation.
Posted on 3/7/26 at 8:34 am to SlowFlowPro
This is a retarded statement that isn't even remotely true.
Posted on 3/7/26 at 8:35 am to SCLibertarian
quote:the same people on here who have posted about “fatigue” and “dindu” for years will cry when you “notice”
Hoosier Jews for Choice
Posted on 3/7/26 at 8:41 am to lake chuck fan
A lot of our leftist lunatics have felt this way for a long time. They're just now getting brave and bold enough to say which "religion" is giving the the "right" to do so.
Posted on 3/7/26 at 8:44 am to lake chuck fan
It’s incredible what the wicked will do to protect their ability to murder their own children “legally”.
I hope they all repent before the end, because if they do not turn to Christ by faith and repentance, their eternity will be horrible for them.
I hope they all repent before the end, because if they do not turn to Christ by faith and repentance, their eternity will be horrible for them.
Posted on 3/7/26 at 8:48 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Correct, for legal purposes. The fetus would be equivalent to the negotiations that go on prior to forming the corporation.
While making no sense logically that is the current state of US law.
Still I would say there are legal secular exceptions where we can kill a person (Castle Doctrine, self defense, but there is no religious right to killing a person.
quote:
Justifiable homicides are killings which are commanded or authorized by law.
Some killings of one human being by another human being are authorized or commanded by law. For example, the killing
of an enemy soldier in combat by another soldier is a homicide, that is, one human being has killed another human being.
Or
quote:
Excusable homicides are killings of human beings which are not deserving of punishment.
Some killings of one human being by another human being, although not commanded or authorized by law, are
nonetheless killings for which we do not wish to punish the killer.
https://www.in.gov/ctb/files/appendix1.pdf
Posted on 3/7/26 at 8:48 am to dbbuilder79
quote:
They're just now getting brave and bold enough to say which "religion" is giving the the "right" to do so.
Judaism, the precursor to Christianity
Posted on 3/7/26 at 8:54 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I know a certain group of edgelords are PISSED they didn't get there first lol:
Which ones did you have in mind?
The Church of Satan? The Babylonian Synagogue? Friendship Society of Secular Cannibals?
Posted on 3/7/26 at 9:00 am to EphesianArmor
quote:
Which ones did you have in mind?
The Church of Satan? The Babylonian Synagogue? Friendship Society of Secular Cannibals?
Nope. The Satanic Temple
quote:
Federal judge dismisses Satanic Temple lawsuit that sought to strike down Indiana’s abortion ban
quote:
A federal judge in Indianapolis has dismissed an attempt by The Satanic Temple to block Indiana’s near-total abortion ban.
The Satanic Temple — a nontheistic religious organization based in Salem, Massachusetts — filed a federal lawsuit last year, claiming that the new abortion ban violates Indiana’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).
The group maintained the ban is unconstitutional and an infringement on its members’ religious beliefs.
quote:
October 26, 2023
Posted on 3/7/26 at 9:06 am to jnethe1
quote:Dude
So if a pregnant woman is killed, should their be 1 or 2 counts of homicide?
Slow isn’t even attempting to provide his opinion.
You’re made at the law and making him answer for it.
mad*
This post was edited on 3/7/26 at 9:10 am
Posted on 3/7/26 at 9:07 am to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Slow isn’t even attempting to provide his opinion.
You’re made at the law and making him answer for it.
Thank you for not being a retard.
Posted on 3/7/26 at 9:07 am to SlowFlowPro
So ostensibly....I was right.
Posted on 3/7/26 at 9:10 am to SlowFlowPro
I have my moments
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News