- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: In 2016 will the Republicans try to make Obama the issue?
Posted on 2/16/14 at 7:09 pm to shattersfull
Posted on 2/16/14 at 7:09 pm to shattersfull
quote:Nonetheless it explains the mentality.
Coming from a Defense Attorney that made me
1
Posted on 2/16/14 at 7:10 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Nonetheless it explains the mentality.
Yep, it is much clearer now.
Posted on 2/16/14 at 7:10 pm to shattersfull
quote:
Yes different points of views are difficult to deal with when you are an attorney.
having a different point of view is one thing. intentionally trying to muddy the waters, trying to change the subject/issue and general intellectual dishonesty is something else.
quote:
Coming from a Defense Attorney that made me
sometimes you have to just bang the table
i'm happy in my job though because every once in awhile you get the client who really did have their rights trampled or didn't do it and the satisfaction from helping them more than makes up for the drudgery of the rest.
This post was edited on 2/16/14 at 7:11 pm
Posted on 2/16/14 at 7:14 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:'
sometimes you have to just bang the table
When you have the facts, argue the facts
When you have the law argue the law
When you have crap....See the quote above!!!!
quote:
i'm happy in my job though because every once in awhile you get the client who really did have their rights trampled or didn't do it and the satisfaction from helping them more than makes up for the drudgery of the rest.
I applaud those who fight for the truly innocent in the justice system. I know that is not your job, your job is to argue the law not truth. I imagine when arguing the law happens to be on the side of truth it must be very rewarding.
Posted on 2/16/14 at 7:28 pm to shattersfull
What a busllshit thread title. They'll make the shite he has been doing the issue and the likelihood a dem president would continue it the issue.
Why in the frick would they not? That would be fricking stupid.
Why in the frick would they not? That would be fricking stupid.
Posted on 2/16/14 at 7:31 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:Hmm. Straw man. I would anticipate running against Obama's "accomplishments" with an aim to killing or mitigating them.
This board was livid in 2008 that Obama and the Democrats were making Bush such an issue
In 2008, if you didn't know better, you'd have thought the Repub nominee was Bush.
Posted on 2/16/14 at 7:43 pm to SettleDown
quote:
In 2008, if you didn't know better, you'd have thought the Repub nominee was Bush.
Finally we get some honesty
Posted on 2/16/14 at 7:50 pm to Draconian Sanctions
They might of been upset because it was working. I imagine a lot of people were upset because Obama was leading in the polls, their anger was more based on that fact.
Posted on 2/16/14 at 8:01 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
I try to have real conversations with you people but y'all make it very difficult so they are few and far between and usually quickly broken up by the mindless, pointless drivel of the majority on here that are complete numbskulls.
You're trollariffic!
Posted on 2/16/14 at 8:30 pm to Elcid96
quote:
They might of been upset because it was working. I imagine a lot of people were upset because Obama was leading in the polls, their anger was more based on that fact.
i guess that's fair
Posted on 2/16/14 at 8:39 pm to Draconian Sanctions
2012 we don't want to go back to the failed policies of the past, Obama.
Posted on 2/16/14 at 8:40 pm to Tigerlaff
quote:
You're nowhere near as smart as you think you are.
Glad I'm not the only who thinks this.....knows just enough to frick things up.
Posted on 2/16/14 at 8:41 pm to OSqueal
quote:
Glad I'm not the only who thinks this
I guess you and tigerlaff are so ignorant that you honestly believe a few posts on a message board qualifies you to make an assessment of someone's intelligence. pathetic
Posted on 2/16/14 at 8:56 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
I guess you and tigerlaff are so ignorant that you honestly believe a few posts on a message board qualifies you to make an assessment of someone's intelligence. pathetic
A few posts? I see why you didn't go into accounting, but that would mean you would have to be at least half honest.
Posted on 2/16/14 at 10:25 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:Good lord. Two over-geralization stereotypes in one sentance. Sad really.
The hypocrisy and intellectual dishonesty of the both this board and the right in general is astounding.
Obviously not everyone on this board subscribes to the same thought. And hypocircy isn't limited to "the right in general".
If you want to make an argument, it's best not to start from a fallacy. You're basically arguing against a cariacture. It's not making your case, nor making you look very smart.
Posted on 2/16/14 at 10:27 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
i try to have real conversations with you people but y'all make it very difficult so they are few and far between and usually quickly broken up by the mindless, pointless drivel of the majority on here that are complete numbskulls.
I mean really, is it any wonder no one wants to engage in "real conversations" with you? You're apparent desire to feel above everyone else appears to be little more than a sad source of self-esteem.
I could be wrong though.
This post was edited on 2/16/14 at 10:34 pm
Posted on 2/16/14 at 11:23 pm to Taxing Authority
Well lets think about what kind of shape the country will be in then...........
the being in the office of POTUS for two F-ING TERMS will usually get some kind of
Responsibility for that. No matter who or what it is.
the being in the office of POTUS for two F-ING TERMS will usually get some kind of
Responsibility for that. No matter who or what it is.
This post was edited on 2/16/14 at 11:25 pm
Posted on 2/16/14 at 11:44 pm to Draconian Sanctions
AND so what if the GOP runs against this obama fool in 2016?
EVERY presidential candidate has done that against the sitting president.
Wouldn't you agree that this obama fool has been an abject failure?
Assuming hillary is the rat nominee, she would be a continuation of this obama fool. AmIrite?
Are you implying that the GOP are 'wacist' if they do make this obama clown one of the major issues?
EVERY presidential candidate has done that against the sitting president.
Wouldn't you agree that this obama fool has been an abject failure?
Assuming hillary is the rat nominee, she would be a continuation of this obama fool. AmIrite?
Are you implying that the GOP are 'wacist' if they do make this obama clown one of the major issues?
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News