- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: In 2010 the Democrats lost 63 house seats and 6 Senate seats
Posted on 11/6/18 at 10:33 pm to MastrShake
Posted on 11/6/18 at 10:33 pm to MastrShake
2014-2016 was stagnant as frick
ETA: check out that y-axis, dumbass
ETA: check out that y-axis, dumbass
This post was edited on 11/6/18 at 10:34 pm
0
Posted on 11/6/18 at 10:34 pm to Slevin7
quote:Because it’s a silly premise offered with no evidence whatsoever. The aggregate “popular vote” has zero meaning no matter how you chop up the districts. It’s a bit like saying “There’s a lot of crime I Illinois, just look at he number of murders on the South side of Chicago.
Why is anybody down voting this.
Posted on 11/6/18 at 10:36 pm to MastrShake
Lmao that y axis. Whoever made that couldn't resist doctoring that chart.
Posted on 11/6/18 at 10:36 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
I know what the senate is for, and why it exists. Something that appears elusive for you
To magnify the power of the small states? I think we agree then.
This post was edited on 11/6/18 at 10:37 pm
Posted on 11/6/18 at 10:37 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
TigerDoc
Your blue wave was a tinkle
Posted on 11/6/18 at 10:38 pm to TigerDoc
quote:Oh boy!
To magnify the power of the small states?
Posted on 11/6/18 at 10:38 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
Yeah, the fact that Wyoming has about 2% of the population of California and the same number of Senators shows the advantage a party that caters to the rural/small population states.
Mother of God
Posted on 11/6/18 at 10:39 pm to Taxing Authority
Learn me, ol' baw.
Posted on 11/6/18 at 10:41 pm to TigerDoc
quote:You’re a classic Dunning Krueger example. I don’t for a moment believe you’re hear for the education. If you wanted it, you could have received it.
Learn me, ol' baw.
This is why everyone is simply laughing at you.
This post was edited on 11/6/18 at 10:42 pm
Posted on 11/6/18 at 10:43 pm to Taxing Authority
From Federalist 62:
You're up.
quote:
The equality of representation in the Senate is another point, which, being evidently the result of compromise between the opposite pretensions of the large and the small States, does not call for much discussion. . . . In this spirit it may be remarked, that the equal vote allowed to each state, is at once a constitutional recognition of the portion of sovereignty remaining in the individual states, and an instrument for preserving that residuary sovereignty. . . .
You're up.
This post was edited on 11/6/18 at 10:45 pm
Posted on 11/6/18 at 10:46 pm to TigerDoc
Warmer. Keep looking.
Posted on 11/6/18 at 10:48 pm to Taxing Authority
Not enough Dunning-Kruger here. I know I'm learning from the master.
Posted on 11/6/18 at 10:49 pm to The Boat
+5 will actually be +6 if Mcsally holds on and replaces Flake
Posted on 11/6/18 at 10:49 pm to MastrShake
quote:
we were still in a massive recession in 2010 and 2012
No we weren’t you idiot.
Posted on 11/6/18 at 10:53 pm to Taxing Authority
So you would allow whoever to chop up districts however you like? That’s a bad idea regardless of which side you are on. Of course it matters.
I think I see your point.
But that’s why we have a house and a senate.
I think I see your point.
But that’s why we have a house and a senate.
Posted on 11/6/18 at 10:55 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
Yeah, the fact that Wyoming has about 2% of the population of California and the same number of Senators shows the advantage a party that caters to the rural/small population states.
Sterilize yourself before you pollute the gene pool with your bastard offspring.
Posted on 11/6/18 at 10:59 pm to Armchair_QB
Too late.
Posted on 11/6/18 at 11:13 pm to MastrShake
quote:i've already destroyed this laughable assertion.
trump was handed nothing but new records
if obama's policies were responsible for the current economic success
and the economy surged right after trump's new policies
and trump's policies are the literal opposite
yet, the economy CONTINUES to improve
how in the world can obama's policies be responsible for the success?
they aren't. only a moron would make this argument
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News