re: I'm listening to the Court hearing on Democrats's Lawsuit in Arizon to Stop the Audit

quote:

---

The unattractive fat lawyer that the Democrats sent said that the audit was being infiltrated with hate groups.

---

I wonder what Republicans would do if Democrats got an audit ordered and then selected Democratic supporting "auditors" to do the audit.

The Arizona Senate is delusional if they think that this audit is going to settle anything.

The company that will lead the audit is a Florida-based company called Cyber Ninjas, which has no experience in elections or election audits. Cyber Ninjas is led by Doug Logan, who supported several conspiracy theories about the election. In December, he retweeted a post that questioned the validity of Maricopa’s ballot count and falsely said Trump may have gotten 200,000 more votes than were reported in Arizona.

Another main cog of the audit group is J. Hutton Pulitzer (F/K/A J. Jovan Philyaw), the charlatan (the Oak Island sword hoax) who claimed that he had hacked into Dominion servers on his laptop while he was testifying before the Georgia legislature.

Supposedly, the audit is going to include a review of all of the signature matches. Imagine how loud the Republicans would howl if a Democratic sympathetic auditor was the sole arbiter of all the signature matches in an election audit.

By the time the results of the audit are picked apart by real election experts, the results of this audit will be beyond useless.

Congratulations

Why are the democrats concerned about security? I thought security was racist.

quote:

---

Imagine how loud the Republicans would howl if a Democratic sympathetic auditor was the sole arbiter of all the signature matches in an election audit.

---

That's nearly every election where signatures are still required, and I'm not talking about the audit, but the count.

quote:

---

The company that will lead the audit is a Florida-based company called Cyber Ninjas, which has no experience in elections or election audits.

---

Are they doing something more than verifying signatures and counting? Because if it involves counting, it's best done by a conservative because math is not racist on the Right and we can actually count. Re signature verification, as I understand it a signature that's iffy is flagged and then reviewed by a panel. Everything is done under observation (I think it's even streamed), unlike the double secret counting Leftists are beholden to.

quote:

---

PHOENIX (AP) — An Arizona judge on Friday temporarily halted an audit of the 2020 election results from Maricopa County as long as Democrats put up $1 million to fund any potential increase in costs.

---

what in the entire frick

The Entire Proggie Argument SCREAMS Guilt!!

quote:

---

Because it is destroying America’s faith in the electoral process to assuage the ego of someone who lost and can’t admit it.

---

If I knew there was fraud, this is exactly what I’d parrot.

quote:

---

Supposedly, the audit is going to include a review of all of the signature matches. Imagine how loud the Republicans would howl if a Democratic sympathetic auditor was the sole arbiter of all the signature matches in an election audit.

---

But no democrat will audit because there was fraud.

quote:

---

several cities in Wisconsin hired a Democrat operative to supervise counting? Or the time the Democrat governments of urban areas in swing states threw out poll workers? Or the time they hired their family members to count votes after the poll watchers had gone home?

---

I don't visit fringe right wing websites so I don't know about those. Perhaps you could post links so I can see where those stories originated.

quote:

---

Or do you mean the time that the Democrat Secretaries of State unilaterally changed the voting laws to favor Democrats in urban areas?

---

Which states were those?

Regarding Wisconsin

quote:

---

Hundreds of pages of emails and other documents obtained by Wisconsin Spotlight show that grant money from private left leaning groups, funded largely by Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, resulted in Democrat activists infiltrating the November presidential election in Wisconsin’s five largest cities. Here’s what the emails and Wisconsin Spotlight’s investigation found:

-A former Democratic operative, Michael Spitzer-Rubenstein, served as a de facto elections administrator and had access to Green Bay’s absentee ballots days before the election Spitzer-Rubenstein asked Green Bay’s clerk if he and his team members could help correct or “cure” absentee ballots like they did in Milwaukee.

-Green Bay’s clerk grew increasingly frustrated with the takeover of her department by the Democrat Mayor’s staff and outside groups.

-Brown County Clerk Sandy Juno said the contract stipulated that Spitzer-Rubenstein would have four of the five keys to the KI Center ballroom where ballots were stored and counted.

-Brown County’s clerk said the city of Green Bay “went rogue.”

-Election law experts said the city illegally gave left-leaning groups authority over the election.

---

Source Wisconsin Spotlight (a local newspaper). These claims were later investigated by Wisconsin legislature where claims of emails were confirmed
By testimony provided under oath. Miraculously- Michael Switzer Rubenstein had nothing to say for himself.

Wisconsin Spotlight Article Outlining Democrat Shadiness


States where the Secretary of State Unilaterally Changed Voting Laws:

Pennsylvania
Michigan
Wisconsin
Georgia (he was a Republican but entered into an unconstitutional agreement to change Ga’a voting procedures with criminal fraudster and tax cheat and debtor Stacey Abrams)

You would have heard about this, but apparently nobody has standing to complain about it and their lawsuits challenging this shite were filed too early before the election and too late after.