- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: “I’m just going to be honest here … I’m not that informed on national security, so.”
Posted on 8/22/26 at 3:13 pm to Flapjacks
Posted on 8/22/26 at 3:13 pm to Flapjacks
What a MORONIC response. She didn't win 50.01% of the August 11, 2026 primary and is now in a runoff. The South Carolina GOP special Senate runoff is a head-to-head contest between Sen. Darline Graham and U.S. Rep. Ralph Norman to replace the late Lindsey Graham. Scheduled for Tuesday, August 25, 2026, the winner will become the Republican nominee for the general election against Democrat Annie Andrews. Sen. Darline Graham finished first in the August 11 special primary with 32.7% of the vote, bolstered by an endorsement from President Donald Trump and support from senior Senator Tim Scott.
Have you always been a moron?
This post was edited on 8/22/26 at 3:15 pm
0
Posted on 8/22/26 at 3:18 pm to HC87
quote:
WHO IS Senator, yes Senator, Darline Graham (R-S.C.) during a special GOP Senate runoff debate this past week.
Yet the POTUS still stumps for her on Friday in MB. It must be a club thing about foreign policy. Cmon folks, we're better than this...and I would post the same darn thing if she had D - S.C. next to her name and a DEM POTUS was still supporting this BS.
Does it actually matter?
They are just going to do whatever their handlers tell them to do.
Posted on 8/22/26 at 3:32 pm to Flapjacks
No more Kings. Senate because of her last name.
F—k ALL incumbents
F—k ALL incumbents
Posted on 8/22/26 at 3:41 pm to PorkSammich
quote:
Benefiting him is the driver for most things.
Posted on 8/22/26 at 3:43 pm to HC87
quote:
WHO IS Senator, yes Senator, Darline Graham (R-S.C.) during a special GOP Senate runoff debate this past week. Yet the POTUS still stumps for her on Friday in MB. It must be a club thing about foreign policy. Cmon folks, we're better than this...and I would post the same darn thing if she had D - S.C. next to her name and a DEM POTUS was still supporting this BS.
You think the entire senate is privy to national security meetings? How often are they updated?
Posted on 8/22/26 at 3:43 pm to davyjones
quote:
he believes he can trust her not to obstruct him; and there’s no serious “learning curve” to figure out with a new and potentially different person’s philosophy in the already perilous Senate.
Smart move on his part. Everybody figured that, we thought you might actually have something.
Posted on 8/22/26 at 3:44 pm to HC87
I’m very informed and there is absolutely no way she is qualified to be a United States Senator.
Posted on 8/22/26 at 3:45 pm to LSUwag
quote:
I’m very informed
How often do you get your updates?
Posted on 8/22/26 at 3:50 pm to tigersbh
Then why all the “why would he ever endorse her?!” And no, everybody didn’t figure that. Should have, but didnt.
ETA…..I guess if you already figured that but still are mind blown as to why, then you’re in that class of conspiracy theory addicts, looking for a fix here too.
This post was edited on 8/22/26 at 3:52 pm
Posted on 8/22/26 at 4:07 pm to LSUwag
Posted on 8/22/26 at 4:17 pm to jlnoles79
And let me guess: you just found that in your exhaustive internet background check of her……..but that’s the extent of your knowledge about her. And no need to research any further - that piece bolsters the narrative (foreign government narrative) just fine.
Posted on 8/22/26 at 4:19 pm to HC87
quote:
if she had D - S.C. next to her name and a DEM POTUS was still supporting this BS.
If she had a “D” next to her name, she’d be supporting fa.ggots, tranny-freaks, illegal Mexicans, moslems, and radical wealth redistribution.
It was suggested in an earlier thread that her being in the senate would essentially be giving Trump a vote in the senate. I’m more than OK with that.
Posted on 8/22/26 at 4:23 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
He was drooling over MIGA Ron then cries about MIGA. His excuse is Ron only got 250k not 250mil like Orange. Yet if Ron won he would have gotten 250mil
Neocon Nikki broke quite a few bots, so TDS it is.
Posted on 8/22/26 at 4:25 pm to HC87
Another retarded clown who could lose even in SC because a competent conservative can't make it, because she has the big Trump endorsement.
Oz. Herschel, Lake. The list goes on. I'm sure she loves the taste of zionist dick, though, just like Lindsey.
Oz. Herschel, Lake. The list goes on. I'm sure she loves the taste of zionist dick, though, just like Lindsey.
Posted on 8/22/26 at 4:31 pm to blueboy
quote:
At a public meeting for constituents on April 6, 2018, Norman engaged in a conversation with representatives from Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America (MDA). During that conversation, he placed his .38 caliber Smith & Wesson handgun on the table to illustrate his belief that "gun violence is a spiritual, mental or people issue, not a gun issue."
How could any red-blooded American vote for a woman over a baw who would do this to prove a point?
This post was edited on 8/22/26 at 4:33 pm
Posted on 8/22/26 at 4:33 pm to Blizzard of Chizz
quote:
most people who aren't sitting in on regular intelligence briefings are not that informed on national security. It's one thing to be informed on it through various media sources, its another to actually read the intelligence..
That's exactly what she should've said, almost verbatim. Instead she gave an answer almost like she's TRYING to lose.
And maybe she is? Maybe she doesn't really want it but feels pressured to run? Especially after Trump's endorsement
This post was edited on 8/22/26 at 4:34 pm
Posted on 8/22/26 at 4:35 pm to soonerinlOUisiana
quote:
that her being in the senate would essentially be giving Trump a vote in the senate.
That’s the rather “undressed” version of it, ie straightforward. Not that there’s anything wrong with that.
So what bolsters that premise is the notion that, and don’t get me wrong, I don’t personally know the following to be an irrefutable stone cold fact, but it would stand to reason that in addition to many other things, he picked up on the unfortunate reality and learned from it, specifically that it’s a much harder task to find and end up with like-thinking people for those critical nominations/appointments, as well as critical endorsements. Trustworthy and likeminded, competent people. In fact that’s probably the most important lesson he learned the first go ‘round - to be much more careful and attentive to characteristics that they may not have thought extremely important last term.
Posted on 8/22/26 at 5:10 pm to davyjones
quote:
it’s a much harder task to find and end up with like-thinking people for those critical nominations/appointments
Flake getting bukaked by the bald cocksucker during the Kavanaugh hearings immediately comes to mind.
Posted on 8/22/26 at 5:16 pm to HC87
Bleed out bitch.
Posted on 8/22/26 at 8:07 pm to HC87
Darline Graham should never have been picked, let alone encouraged to run for the full Senate seat. Another head scratcher from Trump
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News