Started By
Message
locked post

If you didn’t have to pay into SS and Medicare, would you?

Posted on 4/23/19 at 10:49 am
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 10:49 am
I’ll preface this post with this, I’m completely against handout programs like Social Security on their face. I 100% disagree with them and if it wasn’t political suicide for somebody to go after the programs, I’d vote for that candidate in a heartbeat.

With that said, if I wasn’t forced to pay into these programs, I would not. But, if I’m going to be forced to pay into all these programs, I better get every cent out of it that I put in. I do not believe in subsidizing somebody that I have never met and will never meet.

I’m 25, there’s a very real possibility that by the time I’m of age to start pulling SS, there will be nothing there for me even though I paid into it my entire working life. Because I think the ratio now is dead even on who’s paying into SS and who’s taking. Before long, we’ll have more people taking than paying in.

If I didn’t have to pay into these socialist programs, you’re damn right that I wouldn’t.
This post was edited on 4/23/19 at 11:00 am
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 10:49 am to
Medicare yes.

SS no.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52762 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 10:51 am to
I wouldn't. I can handle my money infinitely better than the government.

It should be optional, and you should, at the minimum, get back the exact amount you put in. I'm 100% for suing the shite out of the federal government if someone does not receive what they put in to social security.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89480 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 10:52 am to
If shown a graph of what their contributions would buy them, no one would voluntarily opt-in to social security retirement, IMHO.

If they could pick options a la carte, some might pay for the disability portion (but could probably buy better LTD on the market) and most would pay for Medicare (because there really isn't a market based, unsubsidized alternative to that because of the age you will be in receiving the benefits).

Medicaid is a needs based program (welfare) that comes out of the treasury, so there is no individualized cost to "opt-in" to this program.

Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112410 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 10:53 am to
No, to both.
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
105379 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 10:54 am to
No
Posted by 14&Counting
Eugene, OR
Member since Jul 2012
37592 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 10:55 am to
Medicare yes. I think anyone 65 or older would basically be uninsureable if left to market forces.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54202 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 10:57 am to
I'm pretty sure you don't pay for Medicaid. It's a freebie.
Posted by Huge Richard
Member since Dec 2018
3742 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 10:59 am to
Yes. It’s a bargain assuming you live long enough
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
78353 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 11:02 am to
Having paid into it since 1984, yes I would. If I were 18, no I wouldn't.
Posted by CptRusty
Basket of Deplorables
Member since Aug 2011
11740 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 11:03 am to
I'm going to be 37 this month and I've been maxed out on SS contributions for a while now, so the most pertinent question is if I could cut off all future contributions in exchange for not receiving any benefits, would I do so...

I haven't done the math, but my gut feeling is a resounding hell yes.

I imagine the tipping point is not terribly far off, but I'd have to spreadsheet it all out.
This post was edited on 4/23/19 at 11:06 am
Posted by DellTronJon
Member since Feb 2010
1277 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 11:05 am to
Not no, but hell no.
Posted by TheFonz
Somewhere in Louisiana
Member since Jul 2016
20351 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 11:06 am to
If it was left alone and only do what it was designed to do, I probably wouldn't fuss about paying into it. However, the politicians can't hep themselves and dipped into the fund too many times for other things.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54202 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 11:07 am to
quote:

I haven't done the math
My post from the other thread:

quote:

I figure up one day that I would have to draw my railroad retirement, it's akin to SS but pays more, for seven years for me to get back what I put into it.
Posted by Dday63
Member since Sep 2014
2297 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 11:11 am to
SS is kind of like insurance. It is a terrible use of your money unless you need it. Like you, I don't plan on needing it and wish I could have opted out, but now I plan on living forever and turning a profit!

Health insurance is a horrible financial arrangement if you are healthy. If you do not plan on ever getting a major illness, or breaking any bones, or messing up your back, etc., then you would be fine without health insurance. Just bank the monthly premiums and pay your doctors out of pocket for your occasional visits. There is no reason for you to subsidize the health care of people you have never met and will never meet.

Of course, everyone should really have some type of health insurance, because you never know what will happen to you. The trick is convincing young, healthy people to go ahead and get the insurance so that the funds remain solvent and healthy (i.e., the old, sick people are sufficiently subsidized)

Similarly, SS is a bad financial investment if you plan on having a reasonably successful career and financing your own retirement. If you plan on having a 6 figure salary for a substantial amount of time, make sound investments, and never having to deal with a major market crash or other economic issues, then SS is a complete waste of money for you. You could be investing that money elsewhere, and pass it on to your heirs when you die.

So, the trick with SS is making everyone pay in, even though they may not need, or may die before they are ever eligible to sash in.

You never know what will happen in your future. I personally met some major roadblocks in my career that caused me to start over from scratch a couple of times, and paying that self-employment tax every year really sucks. I don't think I will "need" my SS payments when I finally hang it up, but my current plan is to cash every check, and keep demanding them and cashing them till I'm over 100.

Or maybe I'll die tomorrow and my money will be used by someone else. Same as my health insurance money.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
259906 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 11:12 am to
I've already paid into both for 25+ years
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
73466 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 11:12 am to
Hell no. Both are scams.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
50304 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 11:12 am to
No.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48294 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 11:14 am to
quote:

But, if I’m going to be forced to pay into all these programs, I better get every cent out of it that I put in


If you’re under 45, that ain’t going to happen. Plan for retirement like it won’t be there at all.
Posted by DallasTiger11
Los Angeles
Member since Mar 2004
11804 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 11:15 am to
quote:

I'm going to be 37 this month and I've been maxed out on SS contributions for a while now,

Solid subtle brag
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram